Political Identity and its Impact on the Foreign Policy of the States of the Middle East

 
PIIS086919080009039-9-1
DOI10.31857/S086919080009039-9
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Occupation: Professor
Affiliation: Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations (IMEMO), Russian Academy of Sciences
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Occupation: Senior Research Assistant
Affiliation: Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations (IMEMO), Russian Academy of Sciences
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Occupation: Research Fellow
Affiliation: Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations (IMEMO), Russian Academy of Sciences
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Occupation: Junior Research Fellow
Affiliation: Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations (IMEMO), Russian Academy of Sciences
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Occupation: Junior Research Fellow
Affiliation: Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations (IMEMO), Russian Academy of Sciences
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Occupation: Senior Researcher, Center for Middle East Studies
Affiliation: Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations, Russian Academy of Sciences (IMEMO)
Address: 23, Profsoyuznaya Str., Moscow 117997, Russian Federation
Occupation: Senior Researcher, Center for Middle East Studies
Affiliation: Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations, Russian Academy of Sciences (IMEMO)
Address: 23, Profsoyuznaya Str., Moscow 117997, Russian Federation
Journal nameVostok. Afro-Aziatskie obshchestva: istoriia i sovremennost
EditionIssue 2
Pages55-73
Abstract

<em >At the beginning of the XXI century crisis of statehood and numerous conflicts in the Middle East have resulted in an increase of identities' politicization. Groups that identify themselves by common ethnic, religious and confessional characteristics and formulate political demands on this basis have become more active and politically pronounced.

<em >The use of identities to achieve political goals shows that the existing differences between them are not primary drivers of conflict; they can turn into such drivers only in the process of politicization. Accordingly, attempts to explain the policy of states and non-state actors exclusively through the primordial conflict of identities are unproductive. At the same time, political identity may be used instrumentally by the states in a search for allies and sympathizers.

<em >Middle East States give examples of both the "classical" version of ideological and party affiliation, mainly introduced by the West, and the politicization of local identities. The authors use case-studies (Turkey, Syria, Lebanon, Israel and Iran) to estimate their correlation within countries, as well as their impact on respective foreign policies.

<em >If in Turkish society political self-identification on an ideological basis prevails, in Syria confessional identities have come to the fore during the conflict. In Lebanon the confessional system still provides the functioning of institutions. In Israel, where religion is the most important element of national identity, there is a symbiosis of secular ideologies and religious discourse. In Iran the revolution has turned Islamic-Shiite identity into a major component of the "official ideology".

<em >The use of the identity factor in foreign policy is situational. Emphasis put on religious or confessional identity can be eagerly embraced by some local actors, but can be perceived as anachronistic and as an obstacle to potential cooperation by international players. Nevertheless, forecasting the development of conflict trends in the region is hardly possible without taking into account the impact of political identity.

Keywordspolitical identity, Middle East, ideology, multiple identities, modern and traditional factors, foreign policy, conflicts, international relations
Received31.03.2020
Publication date20.04.2020
Number of characters45961
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.
Размещенный ниже текст является ознакомительной версией и может не соответствовать печатной
1 ВВЕДЕНИЕ Проявления политической идентичности столь же многочисленны, сколь многочисленны группы, идентифицирующие себя по общим идеологическим, этническим, религиозным, конфессиональным, племенным, расовым, территориальным, гендерным признакам и формулирующие на этой основе политические требования. «Политическая идентичность формируется в процессе политизации этих идентичностей, вовлечения их носителей в отношения, связанные с реализацией политических интересов, и становится, таким образом, одной из важнейших категорий, позволяющих концептуализировать динамику общественных отношений», – отмечала российский исследователь И.С. Семененко [Идентичность…, 2017, с. 72].
2 Современные политологические исследования сфокусированы на том, каким образом проявляют себя культура и идентичность, «как они конструируются, изобретаются и коммерциализируются в качестве средств достижения политических целей» [Coate, Thiel, 2010, p. 3].
3 К понятию «политическая идентичность» тесно примыкает политика идентичности, обозначающая борьбу ущемленных в социальном и политическом отношении групп за общественное признание и политическое представительство [Diamond, 2012, p. 64].
4 Политика идентичности берет за основу те характеристики группы, которые отличают ее от остального общества. Известный российский этнолог В.А. Тишков отмечал, что социально-культурные общности можно рассматривать как социальные конструкции, суть которых «составляет разделяемое индивидуумами представление о принадлежности к общности, или идентичность, а также возникающая на ее основе солидарность» [Тишков, 1997, c. 28]. Политика идентичности превращает политические, правовые и культурные запросы таких социальных групп в политическую программу [Kalın, 2006].
5 Повышенное внимание специалистов к данной проблеме далеко не случайно. Политическая идентичность – одна из ключевых характеристик общественных отношений, не только отличающая политические системы, но и влияющая на внешнеполитическое поведение различных акторов международных отношений. Внешнеполитические стратегии государств, поиск ими союзников и партнеров нередко предполагают использование идентичности как политического инструмента. По мнению Кристины Коуш, представляющей американский Фонд Маршалла в Германии, «политические элиты во всем мире пользуются растущей привлекательностью политики идентичности, обращающейся к конкретным группам …» [Kausch, 2018, p. 49].
6 Политизация идентичностей и их борьба за справедливое представительство и доступ к ресурсам в принципе тесно связаны. Некоторые западные авторы даже склонны сводить политику идентичности к попытке «преодолеть отсутствие политического представительства» или к стремлению «трансформировать массу разнообразных предпочтений в политический курс через институты представительства ...» [Dalgliesh, 2013, p. 73].

Number of purchasers: 1, views: 1215

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Gellner E. Nations and Nationalism. Moscow: Progress, 1991 (in Russian).

2. Zhigalina O.I. Ethno-Social Evolution of Iranian Society. Moscow: Vostochnaia literatura RAN, 1996 (in Russian)].

3. Zviagel'skaia I.D. History of the State of Israel. Moscow: Aspekt-Press, 2012 (in Russian)].

4. Zviagel'skaia I.D., Kuznetsov V.A. Statehood in the Middle East. The Future Which Started Yesterday. International Trends (Mezhdunarodnyye protsessy). 2017. Vol. 15. No. 4(51). Pp. 6–19 (in Russian).

5. Identity: Personality, society, politics. Encyclopedic edition. Ed. by I.S. Semenenko. IMEMO RAS. Moscow: Izdatel'stvo «Ves' Mir», 2017 (in Russian).

6. Kireev N.G. Islamic and Turkish synthesis in the state ideology of Turkey. Nations and nationalism in the Muslim`s East. Eds. by V.Ya. Belokrenitsky, N.Yu. Ul'chenko. Moscow: IOS RAS, 2015. Pp. 229–240 (in Russian).

7. Kosach G.G. Palestinian nationalism: formation and evolution. Nations and nationalism in the Muslim`s East. Eds. by V.Ya. Belokrenitsky, N.Yu. Ul'chenko. Moscow: IOS RAS, 2015. Pp. 116–129 (in Russian).

8. Kudriashova I.V. Political Changes and Transformation of Identity in the Countries of the Muslim East. Political Identity and Identity Politics. In 2 Volumes. Vol. 2: Identity and socio-political dimensions in the XXI century. Ed. by I.S. Semenenko. Moscow: ROSSPEN, 2012. Pp. 155–183 (in Russian).

9. Kuznetsov V.A. From the Ocean to the Gulf: One Region’s Identity in the Context of Neomodernity. Bulletin of Moscow State University. Series 25. International Relations and World Politics. 2019. Vol. 11, No. 2. Pp. 9–39 (in Russian).

10. Nadtoka R. Religious Vector of Foreign Policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran: In Search of Balance. Politicheskoe obrazovanie. 2018 (in Russian). http://lawinrussia.ru/ content/ sootnoshenie-religii-i-vneshney-politiki-islamskoy-respubliki-iran (accessed: 5.11.2018).

11. Naumkin V.V. Deeply divided societies in the middle east: conflict, violence, and foreign intervention. Bulletin of Moscow State University. Series 25. International Relations and World Politics. 2015. No.1. Pp. 66–96 (in Russian).

12. Nations and nationalism in the Muslim`s East. Eds: V.Ya. Belokrenitsky, N.Yu. Ul'chenko. Moscow: IOS RAS, 2015 (in Russian).

13. Nessar M. O. Ethnic and tribal factor and political process in modern Afghanistan. Nations and nationalism in the Muslim`s East. Ed. by V.Ya. Belokrenitsky, N.Yu. Ul'chenko. Moscow: IOS RAS, 2015. Pp. 379–383 (in Russian).

14. Oganisian L.D. US and EU Policy in Tunisia: Support for Democratization. Vostok (Oriens). 2016. No. 3. Pp. 127–137 (in Russian).

15. Oreshkova S.F. On the issue of ethnic identification of Muslim peoples: Ottoman experience. Nations and nationalism in the Muslim`s East. Ed. by V.Ya. Belokrenitsky, N.Yu. Ul'chenko. Moscow: IOS RAS, 2015. Pp. 159–163 (in Russian).

16. Orlov V.V. Self-Identification in the Arab world: ethnic, confessional, national. Nations and nationalism in the Muslim`s East. Ed. by V.Ya. Belokrenitsky, N.Yu. Ul'chenko. Moscow: IOS RAS, 2015. Pp. 147–158 (in Russian).

17. Semenenko I.S. (ed.) Political Identity and Identity Politics. In 2 Volumes. Vol. 1: Identity as a Category of Political Science: A Dictionary of Terms and Concepts. Moscow: Rossiiskaia politicheskaia entsiklopediia (ROSSPEN), 2011 (in Russian).

18. Semenenko I.S. (ed.). Political identity and identity politics. In 2 Volumes. Vol. 2: Identity and socio-political dimensions in the XXI century. Moscow: ROSSPEN, 2012. (in Russian).

19. Prozorov S.M. The Shiite Doctrine of the Supreme Power. Islam. Religion, society, State. Ed. by P.A. Griaznevitch, S.M. Prozorov. Moscow: Nauka, Glavnaia redakstiia vostochnoi literatury, 1984. Pp. 204–211 (in Russian).

20. Savicheva E.M. The Lebanese Crisis: Civil War and Unreliable Peace. Vestnik RUDN. International Relations. 2008. No. 2. Pp. 29–40 (in Russian).

21. Semenenko I.S. Political Identity and Identity Politics. Political expertise: POLITEX. 2011. Vol. 7. No. 2. Pp. 5–24 (in Russian).

22. Semenenko I.S. Political Identity and Identity Politics: Ethnic and National Perspectives, European Contexts. “Polis. Political Studies” Journal. 2016. No. 4. Pp. 8–28 (in Russian).

23. Tishkov V.A. Identity and Cultural Boundaries. Identity and Conflict in Post-Soviet States: Collected articles. Ed. by M.B. Olkott, V.A. Tishkov, A.V. Malashenko. Moscow: Moskovskii tsentr Karnegi, 1997. Pp. 15–43 (in Russian).

24. Urtaev V.I. Features and Implementation of the Foreign Policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran in 1979–2010. PhD Thesis. RUDN. Moscow: 2012 (in Russian).

25. 2017 Report on International Religious Freedom: Lebanon. International Religious Freedom Report for 2017. United States Department of State. https://www.state.gov/reports/2017-report-on-international-religious-freedom/lebanon/ (accessed: 15.11.2019).

26. Anderson B. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso, 1983.

27. Anderson L. Power-sharing in Kirkuk. Power sharing in deeply divided places. Ed. by McEvoy J., O’Leary B. Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Press, 2013. Pp. 364–385.

28. Brubaker R. Ethnicity without Groups. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2002.

29. Burton J. Conflict: Resolution and Prevention. London: The Macmillan Press Ltd, 1990.

30. Calhoun C. Social Theory and the Politics of Identity. Oxford: Blackwell. 1994.

31. Coate R., Thiel M. Identity Politics and Political Identities: Local Expressions of Globalizing World. Identity Politics in the Age of Globalization. Ed. by R. Coate, M. Thiel. Boulder: FirstForumPress, 2010. Pp. 1–30.

32. Dalgliesh B. Problematizing the Political Theory of Identity Politics: Towards an Agonistic Freedom. KRITIKE. 2013. Vol 7. No. 1. Ðp. 69–95.

33. Devlin J. The Baath Party: Rise and Metamorphosis. The American Historical Review. 1991. Vol. 96, Issue 5. Pp. 1396–1407.

34. Diamond E. Identity Politics Then and Now. Theatre Research International. 2012. Vol. 37, No. 1. Pp. 64–67.

35. Duran B. Erdo?an’?n BM’deki Feryad?. Kriter Dergisi. Ekim 2019 / Y?l 4, Say? 39. S. 6–8 [Duran B. Erdogan’s Call on the UN. Kriter Journal. October 2019 / Year 4, No. 39. Pp. 6–8 (in Turkish)].

36. Final election results see Likud up to 32 Knesset seats. Israel Hayom. https://www.israelhayom.com/2019/09/25/final-election-results-see-likud-up-to-32-knesset-seats/ (accessed: 25.09.2019).

37. Fukuyama F. Identity: The Demand for Dignity and the Politics of Resentment. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2018.

38. G?zel H.C. Tek ??z?m: 'T?rk Milleti' ?st kimlik -1. Sabah Gazetesi. 09.10.2013. https://www.sabah.com.tr/yazarlar/guzel/2013/10/09/tekcozum-turk-milleti-ust-kimlik-1 [Guzel H.C. The Only Decision: ‘Turkish People’ is the Upper-Level Identity -1. Sabah Newspaper. 09.10.2013 (in Turkish)].

39. Hinnebusch R. The international politics of the Middle East: Second edition. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2015.

40. Hogan P.C. Colonialism and Cultural Identity: Crises of Tradition in the Anglophone Literatures of India, Africa, and the Caribbean. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2000.

41. Horowitz D.L. Ethnic Groups in Conflict. Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1985.

42. Huntington S.P. The Clash of Civilizations? Foreign Affairs.1993.Vol. 72. No. 3. Pp. 22–49.

43. Jaafar R., Stephan M.J. Lebanon’s Independence Intifada: How an Unarmed Insurrection Expelled Syrian forces. Civilian Jihad. Nonviolent Struggle, Democratization and Governance in the Middle East. Ed. by M.J. Stephan. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009. Pp. 169–184.

44. Kal?n ?. T?rkiye’nin Kimli?i. SETA. 24.04.2006. https://www.setav.org/turkiyenin-kimligi/ [Kalin I. The Identity of Turkey. SETA. 24.04.2006 (In Turkish)].

45. Karpat K. Osmanl?'dan g?n?m?ze kimlik ve ideoloji. ?stanbul: Tima? Yay?nlar?, 2009 [Karpat K. Identitiy and Ideology from the Ottomans to Nowadays. ?stanbul: Timas Yayinlari, 2009 (in Turkish)].

46. Kausch Ê. Identity Politics and Regional Order in the Levant. The Levant. Search for a Regional Order. Ed. by Mustafa Ayd?n. Tunis: KAS, 2018. Pp. 48–65.

47. Krayem H. The Lebanese Civil War and the Taif Agreement. Conflict resolution in the Arab world: Selected essays. Ed. by P. Salem. New York: Syracuse University Press, 1997. Pp. 411–436.

48. Kumar R. Negotiating peace in deeply divided societies: a set of simulations. New Delhi, India, Sage Publications India, 2009.

49. Laquer W. A History of Zionism. New York: Schocken Books, 2003.

50. Lijphart A. Consociational democracy. World Politics. 1969. No. 21, Ðp. 207–225.

51. McCulloch A. Power-sharing and political stability in deeply divided societies. Hoboken, Taylor and Francis, 2014.

52. Muslim Millennial Attitudes on Religion and Religious Leadership II: Algeria, Iraq, Lebanon, Libya, Mauritania, Oman, Qatar, Sudan, Tunisia, Yemen. Tabah Foundation. 2017. https://mmasurvey.tabahfoundation.org/downloads/mmasurvey2_en_web-key-findings.pdf (accessed: 15.11.2019).

53. Oran B. T?rkiye'de Az?nl?klar. Kavramlar, Teori, Lozan, ?? Mevzuat, ??tihat, Uygulama. ?stanbul: TESEV Yay?nlar?, 2004 [Oran B. Minorities in Turkey. Concepts, Regulations, Adaptation and Interpretations. ?stanbul: TESEV Yayinlari, 2004 (in Turkish)].

54. ?zk?k E. 23 Haziran sonras?nda dindarl?k ne durumda Atat?rk??l?k ne oldu. H?rriyet Gazetesi. 31.07.2019. http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/ yazarlar/ertugrul-ozkok/23-haziran-sonrasinda-dindarlik-ne-durumda-ataturkculuk-ne-oldu-41289050 [Ozkok E. What is the State of Religiosity after June 23 and What Happened to Atat?rkism. H?rriyet Newspaper. 31.07.2019 (in Turkish)].

55. Playing the Sectarian Card: Identities and Affiliations of Local Communities in Syria. Stolleis F. (ed.) Beirut: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung, 2015.

56. Roshvald A. Ethnic Nationalism and the Fall of Empires: Central Europe, Russia and the Middle East, 1914–1923. London: Routledge, 2001.

57. Sadi R. T?rk?m T?rkiyeli de?il. Haber sitesi OdaTV. 14.02.2017. https://odatv.com/turkum-turkiyeli-degil-1402171200.html [Sadi R. I Am ‘Turkish’, I Am Not ‘from Turkey’. OdaTV News portal. 14.02.2017 (in Turkish)].

58. Saunderson W., Weinreich P. Analyzing Identity: Cross-Cultural, Societal and Clinical Contexts. London: Routledge, 2003.

59. Tajfel H. Differentiation between social groups Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. London: Academic Press, 1978.

60. T?rkdo?an O. T?rk toplumunun tarihsel kimli?i ve g?n?m?z sorunlar?. ?stanbul: IQ K?lt?r Sanat Yay?nc?l?k, 2016 [Turkdogan O. Historical Identity of Turkish People and Modern Problems. ?stanbul: IQ Kultur Sanat Yay?nc?l?k, 2016 (in Turkish)].

61. T?rkiye Cumhuriyeti Anayasas?. 66. Madde. https://www.tbmm.gov.tr/develop/owa/tc_anayasasi.maddeler?p3=66 [Constitution of the Republic of Turkey. Article 66 (in Turkish)].

62. Uncharted Journey: Promoting Democracy in the Middle East. Ed. by Carothers T., Ottaway M. Washington, D.C.: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 2005.

63. Understanding Iran’s Role in the Syrian Conflict. Tabrizi A., Pantucci R. (eds.). London: Royal United Services Institute for Defence and Security Studies. 2016.

64. Uyan?k M. Siyasal kimlik kavram?: M?sl?man Demokrat. Yeni ?afak Gazetesi. 21.08.2012. https://www.yenisafak.com/yerel/ siyasal-kimlik-kavrami-musluman-demokrat-403709 [Uyan?k M. Political Identity Concept: Muslim Democrat. Yeni Safak Newspaper. 21.08.2012 (in Turkish)].

65. Uzer U. Identity and Turkish Foreign Policy: The Kemalist Influence in Cyprus and the Caucasus. New York: I. B. Tauris, 2011.

66. Uzer U. The Revival of Ottomanism in Turkish Foreign Policy: “The World is Greater than Five”. Turkish Policy Quarterly Journal. 2018. http://turkishpolicy.com/article/893/the-revival-of-ottomanism-in-turkish-foreign-policy-the-world-is-greater-than-five (accessed: 15.11.2019).

67. Waxman D. The Pursuit of Peace and the Crisis of Israeli Identity: Defending/defining the Nation. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006.

68. Wimmen H. Syria’s Path from Civic Uprising to Civil War. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 2016. https://carnegieendowment.org/2016/11/22/syria-s-path-from-civic-uprising-to-civil-war-pub-66171 (accessed: 15.11.2019).

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up