Sendero Luminoso in Peru: terror is revolution

 
PIIS013038640019687-3-1
DOI10.31857/S013038640019687-3
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Affiliation: Institute of World History, RAS
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Journal nameNovaia i noveishaia istoriia
EditionIssue 2
Pages134-148
Abstract

The Soviet-Chinese rift in the international communist movement in the 1960s led to the emergence of Maoist communist parties in almost every country in the world, most of which broke away from the communist parties. In a number of places Maoism gained more support than Moscow-backed parties, notably in Peru, where the Maoist movement demonstrated mass appeal and political strength. Within this movement a radical, dogmatic wing emerged which absolutised violence as the only method of political struggle. It was the Peruvian Communist Party Sendero Luminoso (“The Shining Path”) which plunged the country into a decade-long civil war with thousands of victims. In this article the author analyses the ideology and political praxis of the movement, which was a project of militant totalitarian egalitarianism and a left-radical terrorist dictatorship. Sendero Luminoso is an extreme political project, the explanation of which requires not only a political and social but also a psychological approach. The Sendero Luminoso Party grew from a coterie exploring the ideas of José Carlos Mariátegui in the 1960s into a powerful underground insurgent movement in the 1970s and 1980s, which sometimes managed to successfully resist the Peruvian government with all its apparatus of violence, the army and the police. The tactics of the movement were based on the concept of a “protracted people's war” and the encirclement of the city by the countryside, and in practice on all-out violence, declared to be the main creative force of the revolution. The Maoist idea of “service to the people” and the self-sacrifice of revolutionaries was able to capture significant groups of young people, especially students, who devoted themselves wholeheartedly to the cause of the Senderist revolution. Excessive secrecy and rejection of the mass character of the movement made the leadership of the party, led by Abimael Guzmán, invulnerable for many years. The civil war unleashed by the Senderists did indeed bring Peru to the brink of collapse, becoming the starting point of neoliberal political and economic reforms that gained significant public support, explained only by the shock from the left-wing project proposed by the Senderists.

KeywordsMaoism, Peru, terror, Sendero Luminoso, Abimael Guzmán, left-wing extremism, civil war, communist movement, José Carlos Mariátegui
AcknowledgmentThe article was written with the support of the Russian Science Foundation, project № 19-18-00305 “Comintern in Latin America: historical traditions and political processes”.
Received13.02.2023
Publication date30.04.2023
Number of characters48733
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 173

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Ivanovskij Z.V. Ul'tralevye partii i organizacii Latinskoj Ameriki: izmeneniya v ideologii i politike [Ultra-left parties and organizations of Latin America: changes in ideology and politics] // Latinskaya Amerika 80-h godov. Partijno-politicheskaya struktura stran regiona [Latin America of the 80s. Party-political structure of the countries of the region] / otv. red. Z.V. Ivanovskij. Moskva, 1989. S. 51–54. (In Russ.)

2. Ivanovskij Z.V. Ul'tralevyj terrorizm v Peru [Ultra-left terrorism in Peru] // Latinskaya Amerika: politicheskie partii i social'nye dvizheniya [Latin America: Political parties and social movements] / otv. red. Yu.I. Vizgunova, B.M. Merin, Z.V. Ivanovskij, A.F. Shul'govskij. T. 2. Moskva, 1994. S. 52–68. (In Russ.)

3. Zapata A. Marksizm v Peru, 1930–1990 [Marxism in Peru, 1930–1990] // Latinoamerikanskij istoricheskij al'manah [Latin American Historical almanah]. 2020. № 26. S. 218–248. (In Russ.)

4. Asencios D. La ciudad acorralada. Jóvenes de Sendero Luminoso en la Lima de los años 80 y 90. Lima, 2016.

5. Cabrera Morales F. Los discursos del incendio Semifeudalidad, maoísmo y campesinado en Sendero Luminoso, 1980–1990 // Revista de la Red de Intercátedras de Historia de América Latina Contemporánea. Córdoba (Argentina), 2019. № 10. URL: https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/RIHALC/article/view/24497 (access date: 22.11.2021).

6. Cáceres C. Discursos sobre reconciliación: el caso de los presos desvinculados de Sendero Luminoso y MRTA. Lima, 2014.

7. Chávez D. Juventud y terrorismo. Características sociales de los condenados por terrorismo y otros delitos. Lima, 1989.

8. Comisión de verdad y reconciliación. Informe final. T. I–II. Lima, 2003.

9. Degregori C. Qué difícil es ser Dios. El Partido Comunista del Perú – Sendero Luminoso y el conflicto armado interno en el Perú: 1980–1999. Lima, 2010.

10. Dorais G. La crítica maoísta peruana frente a la reforma agraria de Velasco (1969–1980) // IEP documento de Trabajo, 167. Documento de Política, 8. Lima, 2012.

11. Entrevista Héctor Béjar // Lucha armada en la Argentina. 2007. № 9. P. 73.

12. Galway M. Global Maoism and the Politics of Localization in Peru and Tanzania // Left History. 2013. Vol. 17. № 2. Р. 15–19.

13. Gurmendi A. Conflicto armado en el Perú. La época del terrorismo bajo el derecho internacional. Lima, 2019.

14. Guzmán A., Yparraguirre E. Memorias desde Némesis. [S.l.], 2014.

15. Guzmán Reinoso A. De puño y letra. Lima, 2009.

16. Jiménez B. Inicio, desarrollo y ocaso del terrorismo en el Perú: el ABC de Sendero Luminoso y el MRTA ampliado y comentado. T. 1. Lima, 2000.

17. Kirk R. Grabado en piedra. Las mujeres de Sendero Luminoso. Lima, 1993.

18. Portocarrero G. Profetas del odio: raíces culturales y líderes de Sendero Luminoso. Lima, 2012.

19. Rénique J.L. La voluntad encarcelada: las “luminosas trincheras de combate” de Sendero Luminoso del Perú. Lima, 2003.

20. Rothwell M. Influencia de la Revolución China en América Latina: México, Perú y Bolivia // Fuentes del Congreso. 2009. Vol. 4. № 9. P. 7.

21. Sotomayor Pérez J. ¿Leninismo o maoísmo? Lima, 2009.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up