Respect for personal autonomy in sports as a problem of biosocial identity

The article deals with the problem of respect for personal autonomy in sports and the practice of restricting athletes. The two justification factors for restrictions, medico-paternalistic and ethical, are in close correlation with each other and with the ethics of public competitions. The article analyzes the problem of respect for personal autonomy from the point of view of the contradiction between the formally rational set of rules that reflect the standards of fair sports and the unformalized impulse of an autonomous actor, determined by his desire for self-realization and public recognition in its entirety, including the features of biosocial identity. The article analyzes the case of female athletes with a naturally elevated level of testosterone in the blood.

Keywords

testosterone, sport, bioethics, respect for personal autonomy

Received

30.05.2023

Publication date

30.05.2023

Number of characters

10014

Cite

GOST	Belyaletdinov R. Respect for personal autonomy in sports as a problem of biosocial identity // Chelovek – 2023. – V. 34. – Issue 2 C. 95-100 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://chelovek-journal.ru/S023620070025535-5-1 (circulation date: 17.05.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S023620070025535-5
MLA	Belyaletdinov, Roman R "Respect for personal autonomy in sports as a problem of biosocial identity." Chelovek 34.2 (2023):95-100. DOI: 10.31857/S023620070025535-5
APA	Belyaletdinov R. (2023). Respect for personal autonomy in sports as a problem of biosocial identity. Chelovek 34(2), pp.95-100 DOI: 10.31857/S023620070025535-5

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 175

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Bermon S., Garnier P.Y. Serum androgen levels and their relation to performance in track and field: mass spectrometry results from 2127 observations in male and female elite athletes. British journal of sports medicine. 2017. Vol. 51, N 17. P. 1309–1314.

2. Childress J.F. The place of autonomy in bioethics. The Hastings Center Report. 1990. Vol. 20, N 1. P. 12–17.

3. Miah A. Genetically Modified Athletes. Biomedical ethics, gene doping and sport. London: Routledge, 2004.

4. Tudela J. Sex, sport and doping: conflicts for bioethical analysis. Cuadernos de Bioetica: Revista Oficial de la Asociacion Espanola de Bioetica y Etica Medica. 2022. Vol. 33, N 108. P. 213–217.

5. Wiesea D., Escobara J.R., Hsua Y., Kulathinalb R.J., Hayes-Conroya A. The fluidity of biosocial identity and the effects of place, space, and time. Social Science & Medicine. 2018. Vol. 198. P. 46–52.