Philosophical Conceptions of Life and Importance of Hermeneutics in Comprehension of the Essence of Living Beings

 
PIIS004287440001896-0-1
DOI10.31857/S004287440001896-0
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Occupation: Leading scientist
Affiliation: Institute of philosophy, Russian academy of sciences
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Journal nameVoprosy filosofii
EditionIssue 11
Pages76-85
Abstract

It is shown how searching for the ways of knowledge and means of explaining the things essence philosophers strove for rising in their reasoning up to the level of comprehension of the state of things while counting such a comprehension as a genuine knowledge of nature. Later on philosophers made a great deal of efforts for discovering thorough foundations of natural sciences and humanity. They proposed theses concerning the comprehension of life which study presupposes a quest for epistemological replies to fundamental issues. In this way significant contribution was made by W. Dilthey suggesting to distinguish not two (natural and humanitarian) but three types of sciences and emphasized biological sciences based on the knowledge of teleological nexus. Developing this idea H. Plessner characterized biological sciences like the second-person ones as distinct from the first-person and the third-person sciences while distinguishing three types of life (vegetable, animal and human) and introducing the concept of “vitality”. In the paper basic theses of biohermeneutics and the conception of eidetic biology as continuation of Dilthey and Plessner ideas are considered. A conclusion on the importance of hermeneutics for understanding the essence of living beings at the modern stage of development of the philosophy of life is drown.

Keywordslife, organization, nature, human being, understanding, hermeneutics, life sciences, biohermeneutics, eidos, eidetic biology
Received18.12.2018
Publication date19.12.2018
Cite   Download pdf To download PDF you should sign in
Размещенный ниже текст является ознакомительной версией и может не соответствовать печатной

views: 1661

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Bateson, Gregory (1972) Steps to an Ecology of Mind: collected essays in anthropology, psychiatry, evolution, and epistemology, Chandler Publishing Co., San Francisco (Russian Translation).

2. Gadamer, Hans-Georg (1960) Wahrheit und Methode: Grundzüge einer philosophischen Hermeneutik, J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck), Tübingen (Russian Translation 1988).

3. Litowitz, Bonnie E. (2007) “The Second Person”, J. Am. Psychoanal. Assoc. 55 (2007), pp. 1129–1149.

4. Markoš, Anton (2002) Readers of the Book of Life: Contextualizing Developmental Evolutionary Biology, Oxford University Press, New York.

5. Morin, Edgar (1977) La Méthode. La Nature de la Nature, Éditions du Seuil, Paris (Russian Translation).

6. Neubauer, Zdenek (1996) ”Mimo dobro a zlo: Nietszchova biologická ontologie“, Kritický Sbornik 16, pp. 15–22.

7. Neubauer, Zdenek (1997) ”Esse obiectivum – esse intentionale. Cestou k fenomenologické biologii”, Science and Philosophy 8, pp. 113–160.

8. Plessner, Helmuth (1965) Die Stufen des Organischen und der Mensch; Einleitung in die philosophische Anthropologie, De Gruyter, Berlin (Russian Translation).

9. Shulga, Elena N. (2009) “Philosophy of Life. Evolutionary Epistemology”, Oleskin Alexandre V. (ed.), Terminological Vocabulary (Thesaurus). Humanitarian Biology, MSU Publishing House, Moscow, pp. 78–85 (in Russian).

10. Shulga, Elena N. (2013) “Paul Ricoeur Hermeneutics and Modern Issues of Epistemology”, Vdovina Irena S. (ed.) Paul Ricoeur in Moscow, Canon +, Moscow, pp. 237–255 (in Russian).

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up