The Epistemic Preconditions of Philosophical Analysis of Creativity

Occupation: Leading Researcher, Head of Department of Philosophical Problems of Creativity
Affiliation: Institute of Philosophy of Russian Academy of Science
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow

Journal name

Voprosy filosofii

Edition

Issue 11

Pages

65-75

Abstract

Epistemic preconditions of philosophical analysis of creativity have been studied in this paper. It is clearly demonstrated, that creativity gives the way to innovative intentions of Modernity and should be viewed as the process of new cultural meanings’ formation. It also widens semantic space of human reason, activity and social organization. Meaningful dimensions of creativity have also been studied such as cognitive procedures of both meaning-constitutive activity in the framework of transcendental phenomenology and “split-sense” in analytical philosophy. The work has been implemented in the framework of the state project “Epistemology of creativity: cognitive and socio-cultural dimensions”.

Keywords

creativity, meaning, phenomenology, language

Received

18.12.2018

Publication date

19.12.2018

Number of characters

555

Cite Download pdf To download PDF you should sign in

GOST	Smirnova N. The Epistemic Preconditions of Philosophical Analysis of Creativity // Voprosy filosofii – 2018. – Issue 11 C. 65-75 [Electronic resource]. URL: http://ras.jes.su/vphil/s207987840001122-3-1-en (circulation date: 05.11.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S004287440001895-9
MLA	Smirnova, Natalia M "The Epistemic Preconditions of Philosophical Analysis of Creativity." Voprosy filosofii 11 (2018):65-75. DOI: 10.31857/S004287440001895-9
APA	Smirnova N. (2018). The Epistemic Preconditions of Philosophical Analysis of Creativity. Voprosy filosofii (11), pp.65-75 DOI: 10.31857/S004287440001895-9

Размещенный ниже текст является ознакомительной версией и может не соответствовать печатной


1	\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Husserl, Edmund (1950) Gesammelte Werke. Band 1. Cartesianische Meditationen und Pariser Vortrage, Martinus Nijhoff, Haag (Russian translation 2001).

2. Kniazeva, Elena N.(2014) Enactivism: New Form of Constructivism in Epistemology, Zentr gumanitarnich iniciativ, Universitetskaja kniga, Moscow.

3. Novoselov, Michail M. (2010) Abstraction in the labyrinth of cognition. Logical analysis, Idea-Press, Moscow.

4. Rozin, Vadim M. (2001) Semiotic Investigation, Per se, Universitetskaja kniga, (Humanitas), Moscow.

5. Schutz, Alfred (1979) On Phenomenology and Social Relations, The University of Chicago press, Chicago.

6. Smirnov, Andrey V. (2015) Consciousness, Language, Logic, Culture, Meaning, Languages of Slavic Culture Publishing House, Moscow.

7. Stepin, Vyacheslav S. (2000) Theoretical Knowledge. Structure, historical evolution, Progress-Tradition, Moscow.

8. Talmage, Catherine J. (1994) ‘Literal Meaning, Conventional Meaning and First Meaning’, Erkenntnis, Vol. 40, № 2 (Mar. 1994), pp. 213–225.