“The Duty” of the Soviet Man: the Experience of Reconstruction of the Concept (on the Material of Kinotext)

 
PIIS013216250008498-0-1
DOI10.31857/S013216250008498-0
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Occupation: Prof. of the Institute of Russian Studies
Affiliation: Xi’an International Studies University
Address: China, Xi’an
Journal nameSotsiologicheskie issledovaniya
EditionIssue 2
Pages105-114
Abstract

The article offers a socio-cognitive analysis of the subject component of the film construct, based on the original author’s theory of cognitive-pragmatic programs (CPP). The sociocognitive mechanism of recoding the basic concept of “duty” in the consciousness of a Soviet person is investigated. It is necessary to find a universal mediator component, because of the aggressively destructive nature of the totalitarian CPP, creating illusion of neutralizing the destructive orientation. The “order” of a program must be perceived by the carrier of the CPP as a requirement of its own conscience, as an internal “order” of a manipulatively transformed “duty”. As a result, four basic interrelated projections of the CPP are formed: 1) “duty-fear”; 2) “duty-manipulation”; 3) “duty- submission”; 4) “duty-self-sacrifice (self-destruction)”. Each carrier of a CPP passes through four of these basic stages of cognitive-ideological “adaptation”. Passing through them, the subject is in an illusory state of freedom, believing a) that he himself decides who he is (level of self-identification); b) sets a goal for himself (goal setting level); c) decides in what way he will achieve his goal (modeling level of instrumental-operational strategy). Each transformed form of “duty” – CPP/stage of cognitive “adaptation” of a carrier of a CPP has two interdependent modes of incarnation: a) program (stimulus-order); b) subject (automated standardized reaction). Each of the four strategic cognitive-pragmatic sets (CPS) (“duty-fear”, etc.), combining CPP and its carrier, has a complex structure (target stimulus, order, reaction; self-identification stimulus, order, reaction; instrumental stimulus, order, reaction). As a result, the subject’s consciousness is fully controlled by the viral-manipulative mechanism of the CPP, since their general purposeful activity, at any degree of its “programmatic” destructiveness, is perceived by the subject as the embodiment of his own will.

Keywordspolitical consciousness, cognitive-pragmatic program (CPP), cognitive-pragmatic sets (CPS), manipulation, self-identification, duty, fear, self-sacrifice
Received27.02.2020
Publication date16.03.2020
Number of characters33111
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 1372

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Ahiezer A.S. (1999) Mythology of violence in the Soviet period (the possibility of relapse) In: Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost' [Social Sciences and Modernity] No. 2: 85‑93. (In Russ.)

2. Eshev M.A. (2014) Patriotism in Soviet and Post-Soviet Russia In: Vlast' [The Power] No. 5: 85‑89. (In Russ.)

3. Ivanov D.I. (2019) Theory of cognitive-pragmatic programs. Guangdong University of International Studies (PRC), Ivanovo, PresSto. (In Russ.)

4. Kaspe I. (2017) “I Am!”: Late Soviet cinema through the prism of Harrison White’s relational sociology (et vice versa) In: Sotsiologicheskoe obozrenie [Sociological review] Vol. 16. No. 3: 174‑206. (In Russ.)

5. Lukonina O. (2010) Content Motifs of The Works by M. Steinberg in The 20’s to 40’s Soviet Film construct. In: Yuzhno-Rossiyskiy muzykal'nyy al'manakh [South Russian Music Almanac]. No.1: 36‑39. (In Russ.)

6. Plotinksy Y.M. (2010) “Knowledge Society” and the development of a cognitive approach In: Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 18: Sotsiologiya i politologiya [Moscow State University Digest]. Vol. 18. Sociology and political science. No. 1: 45‑63. (In Russ.)

7. Seredinskaja L.A. The Everyday Life Heriocs in The Contemporary Society: Heroics of Labour and Heroics of War In: Izvestiya Altayskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Altai State University News], Vol.  2, No. 2 (74): 221‑224. (In Russ.)

8. Sokhan I., Goncharov D. (2013) Socio-cultural engineering of totalitarianism: the Soviet gastronomic project In: Politiya [Politеia] No. 2: 142‑155. (In Russ.)

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up