Ways and Intersections of Modern Epistemology (Reflections on Book)

Occupation: Professor at Department of Modern Problems of Philosophy at RSUH; Main Research Fellow of Institute for the History of Science and Technology of the RAS
Affiliation:
Department of Modern Problems of Philosophy at Russian State University for the Humanities
Institute for the History of Science and Technology of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow

Journal name

Voprosy filosofii

Edition

Issue 12

Pages

119-130

Abstract

The article analyzes the problems of modern epistemology in the context of understanding the book by Lyudmila Alexandrovna Mickeshina, a famous and authoritative specialist in the field of modern epistemology and philosophy of science [Mickeshina 2016]. It is shown that modern epistemology is experiencing a period of thematic, terminological and meaningful transformations. The author draws the idea that in the book by L. A. Mickeshina carried out a large-scale attempt to demonstrate the intellectual processes in which philosophical gnoseology was involved and which ultimately substantially transformed its problems, goals and objectives. The bottom line is that in the 20th century traditional gnoseology turned into a discipline of a different nature ‒ an epistemology, striving to be as close as possible to concrete cognitive practice, to reflect urgent methodological inquiries and searches for scientific knowledge. Special attention is paid to the distinction between classical and non-classical epistemology, the problem of rationality, understanding the role of phenomenology for the expansion of modern epistemological problems, the dialogue of cognitive practices as one of the most important methodological strategies of the modern philosophy of knowledge, etc. In the foreground are also a discussion of the possible contours of a modern ontology of knowledge, presented in the national epistemological projects of V.A. Lectorsky, B.I. Pruzhinin, V.S. Stepin, V.N. Sadovsky, N.S. Autonomova.

Keywords

gnoseology, epistemology, theory of knowledge, interdisciplinary synthesis, dialogue of cognitive practices, philosophy of knowledge

Received

20.12.2018

Publication date

20.12.2018

Cite Download pdf To download PDF you should sign in

GOST	Kuznetsova N. Ways and Intersections of Modern Epistemology (Reflections on Book) // Voprosy filosofii – 2018. – Issue 12 C. 119-130 [Electronic resource]. URL: http://ras.jes.su/vphil/s111111110000016-0-1-en (circulation date: 05.11.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S004287440002594-8
MLA	Kuznetsova, Natalia I "Ways and Intersections of Modern Epistemology (Reflections on Book)." Voprosy filosofii 12 (2018):119-130. DOI: 10.31857/S004287440002594-8
APA	Kuznetsova N. (2018). Ways and Intersections of Modern Epistemology (Reflections on Book). Voprosy filosofii (12), pp.119-130 DOI: 10.31857/S004287440002594-8

Размещенный ниже текст является ознакомительной версией и может не соответствовать печатной

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Gadamer, Hans-Georg, Aspekte der Modernität (Russian translation).

2. Lektorsky, Vladislav A. Subject. Object. Cognition (In Russian).

3. Sadovsky, Vadim N. Models of scientific knowledge and their philosophical interpretations (In Russian).

4. Stepin, Vyacheslav S. Philosophical anthropology and philosophy of science (In Russian).

5. Avtonomova, Natalia S. (2008) Knowledge and Translation. Experiences of the Philosophy of Language, ROSSPEN, Moscow (In Russian).

6. Avtonomova, Natalia S. (2011) The Philosophical Language of Jacques Derrida, ROSSPEN, Moscow (In Russian).

7. Ankersmit, Franklin R. (1994) History and Tropology: The Rise and Fall of Metaphor, University of California Press, Berkeley, Los Angeles, London.

8. Cassirer, Еrnst (1932) Die Philosophie der Aufklärung, J.C.B. Mohr, Tübingen.

9. Danto, Arthur C. (1965) Analytical Philosophy of History, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

10. Goody, Jack (2007) The Theft of History, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

11. Lektorsky, Vladislav A. (2001) Classical and non-classical epistemology, Editorial URSS, Moscow (In Russian).

12. Lektorsky, Vladislav A. (ed.) (2012) Epistemology. Perspectives of Development, Kanon+, Moscow (In Russian).

13. Mickeshina, Lyudmila A. (2016) Modern epistemology of humanitarian knowledge: interdisciplinary syntheses, ROSSPEN, Moscow (In Russian).

14. Pruzhinin, Boris I. (2009) Ratio serviens? Outlines of cultural-historical epistemology, ROSSPEN, Moscow (In Russian).

15. Pruzhinin, Boris I., Avtonomova, Natalia S., Bazhanov, Valentin A., Filatov, Vladimir P., Griftsova, Irina N., Kazavin, Ilya T., Knyazev, Viktor N., Lektorsky, Vladislav A., Makhlin, Vitaliy L., Mickeshina, Lyudmila A., Olkhov, Pavel A., Porus, Vladimir N., Shchedrina, Tatiana G., Sorina, Galina V. (2016) ‘The Self-Integrity of Knowledge as a Problem of Modern Epistemology. Materials of Round Table’, Voprosy Filosofii, Vol 8 (2016), pp. 20–56 (In Russian).

16. Quine, Willard Van Orman (1968) ‘Ontological Relativity’, The Journal of Philosophy, 65, 7, pp. 185–212.

17. Ricoeur, Paul (1985) Temps et récit, Seuil, Paris.

18. Sadovsky, Vadim N. (2004) ‘The establishment of the philosophy of science and a systems approach in Russia in the second half of the 20th century’, Voprosy Filosofii, Vol. 1 (2004), pp. 99–109 (In Russian).

19. Stepin, Vyacheslav S., Arshinov, Vladimir I., Fedotova, Valentina G., Guseynov, Abdusalam A., Lektorsky, Vladislav A., Pruzhinin, Boris I. ‘The Analyses of Structure and Dynamics of Science in Social-Cultural Context. Materials of the discussion of V.S. Stepin’s Selected Works’, Voprosy Filosofii, Vol. 12 (2017), pp. 5–31 (In Russian).

20. White, Hayden (1973) Metahistory, The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland.