“The Sciences Were Never at War”: Sir Joseph Banks and Anglo-French Scientific Cooperation during the French Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars

 
PIIS020596060032378-7-1
DOI10.31857/S0205960624020033
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Affiliation: Ural Federal University
Address: Yekaterinburg, Ul. Turgeneva, 4
Journal nameVoprosy istorii estestvoznaniia i tekhniki
EditionVolume 45 Issue 2
Pages278-290
Abstract

The article is devoted to the history of interactions between Sir Joseph Banks, President of the London Royal Society in 1778–1820, and the French naturalists during the French Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars. From the beginning of the French Revolution the communication between the English and French scientists was hindered and, in some cases, stopped altogether. Banks’ actions helped to renew contacts and reactivate scientific life in both countries. His input was essential for the intellectual heritage of French scientists such as Jacques Julien de La Billardière, Déodat de Dolomieu, and Pierre Bernard Milius. The exchange of periodicals, the conservation of natural science collection and returning it to France, the naturalists’ liberation from captivity – the credit for all of this belongs to Joseph Banks. The analysis in this article is based on the correspondence between Banks, French naturalists and British ministers, published by the British embryologist Sir Gavin de Beer in 1960. The article reveals the context in which this publication appeared and offers Russian translation of the fragments of these letters. Special attention is given to the British scientific culture. Thus, the author suggests to ponder on the extent to which Banks’ actions were determined by the professional culture of the time or by the English mentality. Both of these factors could have possibly influenced Banks’ actions, paradoxical in a sense that in the situation of armed conflicts they turned out to be potentially advantageous for the French science.

KeywordsJoseph Banks, Gavin de Beer, Jacques Julien de La Billardière, Déodat de Dolomieu, Pierre Bernard Milius, scientific culture
Keywords list (other)Исследование выполнено при поддержке Российского научного фонда, проект № 22-18-00488 «Кризис ценностей и стратегии преодоления: идея “общего блага” в интеллектуальном дискурсе Британии и России (1650–1750)»
Received18.05.2023
Publication date28.06.2024
Number of characters29207
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 13

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Barrington, E. J. W. (1973) Gavin Rylands de Beer, 1899–1972, Biographical Memoirs of Fellows of the Royal Society, vol. 19, iss. 19. pp. 65–93.

2. Beer, G., de (1960) The Sciences Were Never at War. London: Thomas Nelson and Sons.

3. Bir G., de (Beer, G., de) (2005) Gannibal: bor’ba za vlast’ v Sredizemnomor’e [Hannibal: The Struggle for Power in the Mediterranean]. Moskva: Rusich.

4. Cody, L. F. (2005) Birthing the Nation: Sex, Science and the Concept of the Eighteenth-Century Brittons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

5. Daston, L. (Daston, L.) (2020) O tsennosti kollektivnoi raboty i issledovaniia praktik. Interv’iu s Lorrein Daston [On the Value of Teamwork and the Studies of Practices. Interview with Lorraine Daston], Logos, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 1–14.

6. Dolomieu, D., de (1801) Sur la philosophie minéralogique et sur lʼespèce minéralogique. Paris: De lʼImprimerie de Bossange, Masson et Besson.

7. Dzhons, Dzh. (Jones, J.) (2020) Britanskoe iskusstvo ot Khogarta do Benksi. Empirizm kak genii britanskogo iskusstva [British Art from Hogarth to Banksy. Empiricism as the Genius of British Art]. Moskva: Slovo.

8. Fuller, S. (Fuller, S.) (2020) Kun protiv Poppera: bor’ba za dushu nauki [Kuhn vs.t Popper. The Struggle for the Soul of Science]. Moskva: Kanon + and Reabilitatsiia.

9. Fullford, T. (2019) The Role of Patronage in Early Nineteenth-Century Science, as Evidenced in Letters from Humphry Davy to Joseph Banks, Notes and Records of the Royal Society, vol. 73, iss. 4, pp. 457–475.

10. Grinfel’d, L. (Greenfeld, L.) (2012) Natsionalizm. Piat’ putei k sovremennosti [Nationalism. Five Roads to Modernity]. Moskva: PER SE.

11. La Billardière, J. J. H., de (1800) Relation du voyage à la recherche de La Pérouse, fait par ordre de lʼAssemblée constituante, pendant les années 1791, 1792 et pendant la 1ère et la 2de année de la République Françoise. Paris: Chez H. J. Jansen, imprimeur-libraire, vols. 1–2.

12. La Billardière, J. J. H., de (1804–1806) Novae Hollandiae plantarum specimen. Parisius: Ex typographia Dominae Huzard.

13. Sargent, M. R. (2012) From Bacon to Banks: The Vision and the Realities of Pursuing Science for the Common Good, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 82–90.

14. Shipitsyna, Iu. S. (2021) Rozhdenie botaniki v Britanii: imperskii i natsional’nyi diskursy (posledniaia tret’ XVIII – nachalo XIX v.) [The Birth of Botany in Britain: the Imperial and National Discourses (Last Third of the 18th – Early 19th Century)]. Ekaterinburg: Ural’skii federal’nyi universitet.

15. Sigrist, R. (2013) On Some Social Characteristics of the Eighteenth-Century Botanists, in: Holenstein, A., Steinke, H., and Stuber, M. (eds.) Scholara in Action. The Practice of Knowledge and the Figure of the Savant in the 18th century. Leiden and Boston: Brill, pp. 205–234.

16. Sigrist, R., and Widmer, E. D. (2011) Training Links and Transmission of Knowledge in 18th Century Botany: A Social Network Analysis, Revista hispana para el análisis de redes sociales, vol. 21, no. 7, pp. 319–359.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up