Кaliningrаd Oblast’ Image In Migrants’ Narratives

The image of a region is an interdisciplinary research subject both at the international level of analysis and in domestic works there features conceptually contradictory approaches and the need for sociological support vs results obtained. This article aims to demonstrate theoretical and methodological value and empirical potential of the research object - the Kaliningrad oblast’, information about which is formed mainly from the mass media due to its special territorial location. The subject of the research is reproduction of images of the Kaliningrad region in the discursive consciousness of two social groups for which information about the region is directly incorporated into social practices: immigrants and emigrants. Research methods: content analysis of media publications and in-depth interviews. Through the Medialogia platform, the entire universe of Russian media reports about the region 2014 through 2020 was downloaded (N = 7000), the sample consisted of 2577 publications. In-depth interviews with immigrants (n = 45) and emigrants (n = 15) were analyzed via program Atlas.ti. The structure of the information field of the Kaliningrad region is described. In the group of immigrants the dominant image of the Kaliningrad region is a tourist attracting region of international cooperation. The image of a tourist region with a developing infrastructure prevails in the group of emigrants. It is concluded that there is a high potential for interdisciplinary research of the region's image, by which we propose to understand the system of recursive constitution and reproduction of images (ideas) and social practices (relations), depending on the type of resources (information sources) used and the social group of actors (target audience).

Keywords

image of a region, image, mass media, Kaliningrad region, migrants, immigrants, emigrants

Acknowledgment

The work was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research and the Governments of the Kaliningrad region, project No. 19-411-390001.

Received

27.06.2022

Publication date

28.06.2022

Number of characters

29528

Cite

GOST	Shchekoturov A. Кaliningrаd Oblast’ Image In Migrants’ Narratives // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya – 2022. – Issue 6 C. 43-54 [Electronic resource]. URL: http://ras.jes.su/socis/s013216250020897-9-1 (circulation date: 08.05.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S013216250016979-9
MLA	Shchekoturov, Aleksandr "Кaliningrаd Oblast’ Image In Migrants’ Narratives." Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya 6 (2022):43-54. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250016979-9
APA	Shchekoturov A. (2022). Кaliningrаd Oblast’ Image In Migrants’ Narratives. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya (6), pp.43-54 DOI: 10.31857/S013216250016979-9

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 459

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Almedia-Garcia F., Domigunez-Azcue J., Mercade-Mele P., Perez-Tapia G. (2020) Can a Destination Really Change its Image? The Roles of Information Sources, Motivations, and Visits. Tourism Management Perspectives. No. 34: 1—16. DOI: 10.1016/j. tmp.2020.100662.

2. Afshardoost M., Eshaghi M. (2020) Destination Image and Tourist Behavioral Intentions: a Meta-Analysis. Tourism Management. No. 81: 1—10. DOI: 10.1016/j. tourman.2020.104154

3. Antonova N.L., Rakevich E.V. (2016) Citizens as a Subject of the Formation of the City's Image. Bulletin of Perm University. Vol. 2 (26): 160-166. DOI: 10.17072 / 2078-7898 / 2016-2-160-166. (in Russ)

4. Bondarenko E.V. (2010) Image of the Region as a Category of Sociology of Culture. Bulletin of the Stavropol State University. No. 4: 39-45 (In Russ)

5. Carneiro J., Faria F. (2016) Quest for Purposefully Designed Conceptualization of the Country-Of-Origin Image Construct. Journal of Business Research. Vol. 69. No. 10: 4411–4420. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.12.075

6. Dracheva Y.N. (2019) The Concept of a Media Image and its Description in Linguistic and Non-Linguistic Aspects. Vestn. Cherepovets. State University. No. 2: 134−146. DOI: 10.23859 / 1994-0637-2019-2-89-13. (In Russ)

7. Elliot S., Papadopoulos N., Kim S.S. (2011) An Integrative Model of Place Image: Exploring Relationships Between Destination Product and Country Images. Journal of Travel Research. Vol. 50. No. 5: 520–34. DOI: 10.1177/0047287510379161

8. Glushkova T.S., Zaitseva O.A. (2017) Media Image as a Tool for Creating a Territorial Image: a Cognitive Aspect. Science About Man: Humanitarian Studies. No. 3 (29): 50-57. DOI: 10.17238 / issn1998-5320.2017.29.50 (In Russ)

9. Graver A.A. (2012) Image, Image and Brand of the Country: Concepts and Directions of Research. Bulletin of the Tomsk State University. No. 3 (19): 29-45 (In Russ)

10. Gribova K.L. (2018) City Image in the Context of Globalization. Sociology. No. 3: 93-101. (In Russ)

11. Gurov S.A., Kortsygina V.A. (2016) Perception, Image, Image, Stereotype and Brand of the Territory: Comparison of Categories. Uchenye Zapiski of the Crimean Federal University. Vol. 2 (68). No. 2: 3−22. (In Russ)

12. Hynes N., Caemmerer B., Martin E., Masters E. (2014) Use, Abuse or Contribute! A Framework for Classifying how Companies Engage with Country Image. International Marketing Review. Vol. 31. No. 1: 79–97. DOI: 10.1108/IMR-12-2012-0206

13. Krishtal M.I., Schekoturov A.V., Zimovina E.P. (2019) Geopolitical and Socio-Cultural Components of the Image of the Kaliningrad Region in the Views of the Reform Generation and the Generation of Millennials. Pskov Regionological Journal. No. 4 (40): 34-47. (In Russ)

14. Lopez C., Balabanis G. (2020) Country Image Appraisal: More Than Just Ticking Boxes. Journal of Business Research. Vol. 117: 764-779. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.004

15. Lu I., Kwan E., Heslop L., Thomas D., Cedzynski M. (2019) The Ivory Tower and the Street: How Researchers Defined Country Image Over Four Decades and What Consumers Think it Means. Journal of Business Research. Vol. 105: 80−97. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.030

16. Lynch K. (1982) Image of the City. Moscow: Stroyizdat. (In Russ)

17. Nadeau J., Olafsen A. (2015) Country Image Evaluations and Migration Intentions. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy. No. 11: 293—308. doi:10.1057/pb.2015.8.

18. Napalkova I.G., Kurochkina K.V. (2018) Image of the Region: Specificity, Basic Elements and Design Technologies. Economic History. Vol. 14. No. 4: 404–413. DOI: 10.15507 / 2409-630X.043.014.201804.414-429. (In Russ)

19. Radaev V.V. (2018) Millennials Against the Background of Previous Generations: an Empirical Analysis. Sociological Studies. No. 3: 15-33. DOI: 10.7868 / S0132162518030029. (In Russ)

20. Roth K.P., Diamantopoulos A. (2009) Advancing the country image construct. Journal of Business Research. Vol. 62. No. 7: 726–740. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.05.014

21. Shchekoturov A.V., Krishtal M.I., Zimovina E.P. Media Images of the Kaliningrad Region in the Structure of Migration Attitudes of Millennials and the Reform Generation. Baltic Region. 2021. Vol. 13. No S2: 165-182. DOI: 10.5922/2079-8555-2021-2-9.

22. Shchekoturov A.V., Vinokurov V.V. (2020) Outpost or Region of International Cooperation: How the Images of the Kaliningrad Region in Russian Media Changed in 2014-2018. MediaScope. No. 3. DOI: 10.30547/mediascope.3.2020.3. (In Russ)

23. Zimovina E.P., Schekoturov A.V., Krishtal M.I. (2020) Spatial Mobility and Migration Attitudes of the Reform Generation and the Generation of Millennials in the Kaliningrad Region. Bulletin of Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University. No. 2: 86–105. (In Russ)