All
 
|
 
 


Transformation of the Internet as a Space of Public and Political Communications: From Globalization to Glocalization
 
PIIS013216250013572-2-1
DOI10.31857/S013216250013572-2
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Yulia D. Artamonova 
Occupation: Assoc. Prof.
Affiliation: Lomonosov Moscow State University
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Sergey Volodenkov
Occupation: Prof.
Affiliation: Lomonosov Moscow State University
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Journal nameSotsiologicheskie issledovaniya
EditionIssue 1
Pages87-97
Abstract

The aim of this work was to analyze expert opinions obtained in the course of an international study and to identify key scenarios, technologies, and subjects of contemporary Internet transformation as a digital space of mass social political communication. Under conditions of intensive penetration of Internet communication technologies into current political practice, identifying possible digital space evolution vectors and its potential impact on the functioning processes of contemporary society has become a main objective of the article. Also, work discusses new network actors in current politics in an attempt to analyze the potential and features of their functioning. The subject of this work was also possible changes in the socio-political sphere in the context of contemporary Internet communication technologies development. The article presents possible transformations of traditional public policy sphere related to the ongoing political space digitalization.

Keywordsdigital politics, network actors, internet, digital communications, public politics
Received25.01.2021
Publication date10.02.2021
Number of characters32474
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 1, views: 1664

Readers community rating: votes 0 

1. Abramov R.N. (2006) Mobile communication technologies and everyday life. Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsialnoy antropologii [The Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology]. Vol. 9. No 4: 185–192. (In Russ.).
2. Altheide D. L. (2016) The media syndrome. New York: Routledge.
3. Artamonova Y.D., Demchuk A.L. (2020) “Connective Identity” in the Contemporary World. Voprosy Filosofii [Questions of Philosophy]. Vol. 4: 69–79 (In Russ.)
4. Bennett W.L., Segerberg A. (2013) The Logic of Connective Action: Digital Media and the Personalization of Contentious Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Castells М. (2016) The power of communication. Мoscow: HSE Publishers. (In Russ.)
6. Center for the Digital Future. (2008) The 2008 Digital Future Report: Surveying the Digital Future, Year Eight. Los Angeles: University of Southern California, Annenberg School Center for the Digital Future.
7. Centola D. (2010) The Spread of Behavior in an Online Social Network Experiment. Science. Vol. 329. No. 5996: 1194–1197.
8. Entman R.M. (2004) Projections of Power: Framing News, Public Opinion, and US Foreign Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
9. Etling B., Alexanyan K., Kelly J., Faris R., Palfrey J., Gasser U. (2010) Public Discourse in the Russian Blogosphere: Mapping RuNet Politics and Mobilization. Berkman Center Research Publication No. 2010–11. October 19.
10. Gonzalez-Bailon S., Ning Wang. (2016) Networked Discontent: The Anatomy of Protest Campaigns in Social Media. Social Networks. No. 44: 95–104.
11. Ignatiev V.I. (2020) Social locality in the age of information and network glocalization. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniia [Sociological Studies]. No 7: 37–46. (In Russ.)
12. Keane J. (2015) Democracy and media decadence. Мoscow: VHSE. (In Russ.)
13. Koehler H. (2013) New social media: a chance or an obstacle to dialogue? POLIS. Politicheskie issledovaniya [POLIS. Political Studies]. No. 4: 75–87. (In Russ.)
14. Laclau E. (2009) On populism // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Ser. 12. Politicheskiye Nauki [Bulletin of the Moscow University. Ser. 12. Political science]. No. 3: 54–68. (In Russ.)
15. Lovink G. (2019) Critical theory of the Internet. Мoscow: Ad Marginem Press, MSI “Garazh”. (In Russ.)
16. Martin C.J. (2016) The Sharing Economy: A Pathway to Sustainability or a Nightmarish Form of Neoliberal Capitalism? Ecological Economics. No. 121: 149–159.
17. Morozov Е. (2014) The Internet as an illusion. Reverse side of the network. Мoscow: AST. (In Russ.)
18. Nim Е.G. (2016) “Toy rallies”: in search of a theory of mediatization of civil protest. Zhurnal issledovaniy sotsial’noi politiki. [Journal of social policy research]. Vol. 14. No 1: 55–70. (In Russ.)
19. Pariser E. (2011) The filter bubble. What the internet is hiding from you. New York: Penguin Press.
20. Rheingold H. (2006) Smart crowd: a new social revolution. Мoscow: FAIR-PRESS. (In Russ.)
21. Sunstein C. (2001) Echo chambers: Bush v. Gore, Impeachment, and Beyond. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
22. Surowiecki J. (2007) Wisdom of the crowd. Why we are smarter together than individually, and how collective intelligence shapes business, economy, society, and government. Мoscow: OOO “I.D.Vilyams”. (In Russ.)
23. Suslov S.I. (2016) Simulation of echo chambers in the network analysis of online communities in the social network "Vkontakte" on the example of the St. Petersburg political segment of the network. Teorii I problem politicheskikh issledovaniy [Theories and problems of political research]. No 3: 136–146. (In Russ.)
24. Volodenkov S.V., Artamonova Yu.D. (2020) Information capsules as a structural component of contemporary political internet communication. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Politologiya [Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science]. № 53: 188–196. (In Russ.)

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up