Judicial System of Post-Soviet Russia: Social Context

Occupation: Prof. of Department of Political Science
Affiliation: National Research University Higher School of Economics
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow

Journal name

Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya

Edition

Issue 8

Pages

84-95

Abstract

This article provides insight into the state of the judicial system in post-Soviet Russia within social context. It involves results of a survey of the Russian citizens’ attitude towards the judicial system and judiciary. Majority disapproval is determined by the fact that people do not respect or trust courts of law assuming that they are dependent on the other branches and influenced by other political and economic actors. They believe that the judges are not willing to protect citizens’ rights, are corrupt, unfair and inhumane, which determines the accusatory bias of the Russian judicial system. At the same time, Russian judiciary consists mainly of representatives of administrative and bureaucratic professional subculture focused on superior authorities and powers, most court chairpersons have Soviet professional training and experience. The Judicial system of post-Soviet Russia has inherited problems of Soviet justice and is incapable of acting in the social system as an impartial arbitrator and conscience of the state.

Keywords

post-Soviet Russia, social context, sociological studies, judicial system, judiciary

Received

08.08.2019

Publication date

12.08.2019

Number of characters

33683

Cite

GOST	Nisnevich Y. Judicial System of Post-Soviet Russia: Social Context // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya – 2019. – Issue 8 C. 84-95 [Electronic resource]. URL: http://ras.jes.su/socis/s013216250006165-4-1-en (circulation date: 08.10.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S013216250006165-4
MLA	Nisnevich, Yuliy A "Judicial System of Post-Soviet Russia: Social Context." Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya 8 (2019):84-95. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250006165-4
APA	Nisnevich Y. (2019). Judicial System of Post-Soviet Russia: Social Context. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya (8), pp.84-95 DOI: 10.31857/S013216250006165-4

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 2, views: 2643

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Annual report of European Court of Human Rights (2018). Council of Europe. URL: https://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Annual_report_2018_ENG.pd  (accessed 21.03.2019).
2. Comments on the Legislation on the Judicial System of the Russian Federation (2003) / Pod red. T.G. Morshchakovoi. Moscow: Iurist. (In Russ.)
3. Courts: Ideas About Their Justice, Independence, Personal Experience (2018). Ezhenedel'nyi opros «FOMnibus» 4–5 August 2018. FOM. URL: https://fom.ru/Bezopasnost-i-pravo/14080  (accessed 29.03.2019). (In Russ.)
4. Institutional Trust. Press Releases 2015—2018. Levada-Center. URL: https://www.levada.ru/category/press/  (accessed 29.03.2019). (In Russ.)
5. Nisnevich Yu.A. (2017) Politics and Corruption: Corruption as a Factor in the Global Political Process. Moscow: Iurait. (In Russ.)
6. Pashin Sergei (2014) The Judicial System of Russia: perelitsovka // Domestic Notes [Otechestvennye zapiski]. №3 (60). URL: http://www.strana-oz.ru/2014/3/sudebnaya-sistema-rossii-perelicovka  (accessed 29.03.2019). (In Russ.)
7. People and Corruption: Europe and Central Asia (2016). Global Corruption Barometer. Transparency International.
8. Russia 2014: Mysteries of Public Opinion. Will the Patriotic Mobilization Survive the Economic Crisis? (2015) Diskussii. Fund Liberal'naia missiia. URL: http://www.liberal.ru/articles/6694  (accessed 29.03.2019). (In Russ.)
9. State and Public Institutions: performance evaluation (2018). Press Release 27 December 2018. VTsIOM. URL: https://wciom.ru/index.php?id=236&uid=9494  (accessed 21.03.2019). (In Russ.)
10. The Concept of Judicial Reform in the Russian Federation (2001) / pod red. B.A. Zolotukhina. Moscow: ZAO «Redaktsiia gazety “Demokraticheskii vybor”. (In Russ.)
11. The Global Competitiveness Report 2017-2018. The World Economic Forum. 2018. URL: http://www3.weforum.org/docs/GCR2016-2017/05FullReport/TheGlobalCompetitivenessReport2017-2018_FINAL.pdf  (accessed 21.03.2019).
12. Volkov V., Dmitrieva A., Pozdniakov M., Titaev K. (2015) Russian Judges. Sociological study of the profession / pod red. V. Volkova. Moscow: Norma. (In Russ.)
13. Volkov V.V., Dmitrieva A.V., Pozdniakov M.L., Titaev K.D. (2012) Russian Judges as a Professional Group: Sociological Studies / pod red. V. Volkova. Saint-Petersburg: Institut problem pravoprimeneniia Evropeiskogo universiteta v Sankt-Peterburge. (In Russ.)
14. Vorozheikina Tat'iana, Gudkov Lev, Zorkaia Natal'ia, Ovakimian Aded' (2014) Monitoring the Attitude of the Russian Population to the Judicial Reform and the Judicial System // The Herald of Public Opinion [Vestnik obshchestvennogo mneniia]. №3-4 (118). P.13-69. (in Russ.)