Es ist die Großmannsuchtˮ: The Kraftgenieˮ as Reconsidered  in The Robbersˮ by F. Schiller

Schiller’s early play, “The Robbers” (“Die Räuber&8j1;), is broadly considered to be a typical example of the Sturm and Drang movement. This article suggests rethinking of that conjecture. Schiller's interest in the image of the “strong man” (“Kraftmensch&8j1;) is undeniable: it is evidenced by the parallels between the text of “The Robbers” and the plays by several Sturm und Drang authors. However, Schiller’s attitude towards this type of character is more complex than is commonly believed. This becomes apparent when comparing the two versions of the tragedy, i.e. the closet drama printed in 1781 and the version adapted for the theatre in Mannheim. The latter version fits well into the Sturm und Drang canon: it asserts the greatness of a strong person who opposes the entire world reaching a tragic triumph. In the scenic version, Karl Moor acts as a pagan priest sacrificing Amalia and himself. Some parts of Karl’s speech and action obviously allude to the Gospel, and Karl himself acts as the redeemer who is able to reconcile his fellow robbers with the heavenly Father. In the closet drama, by contrast, the “Kraftmensch” is treated as a problematic figure; his messianic pretensions are shown to be inadequate. Instead of relying on the character’s strength, Schiller stresses the necessity of patience, an idea that the first version of “The Robbers” has in common with Schiller’s next works. The motive of patience is clearly expressed in Luise Miller, while Ferdinand (whom Luise on certain occasions opposes) acts according to the Sturm und Drang model. It appears that the difference between the two variants of “The Robbers” is caused not by external circumstances, but by internal factors: Schiller’s first play is a critical reconsideration of such Sturm und Drang notions as the “Kraftgenie” or “Kraftmensch”.

Keywords

F. Schiller, Sturm und Drang, Kraftgenie, Milton, Dostoevsky, history of drama, history of German literature

Received

11.11.2022

Publication date

11.11.2022

Number of characters

22562

Cite

GOST	Cherepanov D. “Es ist die Großmannsuchtˮ: The “Kraftgenieˮ as Reconsidered in “The Robbersˮ by F. Schiller // Izvestiia Rossiiskoi akademii nauk. Seriia literatury i iazyka – 2022. – V. 81. – Issue 5 C. 18-25 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://izv-oifn.ru/S160578800022741-1-1 (circulation date: 06.05.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S160578800022741-1
MLA	Cherepanov, D. "“Es ist die Großmannsuchtˮ: The “Kraftgenieˮ as Reconsidered in “The Robbersˮ by F. Schiller." Izvestiia Rossiiskoi akademii nauk. Seriia literatury i iazyka 81.5 (2022):18-25. DOI: 10.31857/S160578800022741-1
APA	Cherepanov D. (2022). “Es ist die Großmannsuchtˮ: The “Kraftgenieˮ as Reconsidered in “The Robbersˮ by F. Schiller. Izvestiia Rossiiskoi akademii nauk. Seriia literatury i iazyka 81(5), pp.18-25 DOI: 10.31857/S160578800022741-1

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 259

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Berkovsky, N.Ya. Teatr Shillera [Schiller’s Theatre]. Voprosy literatury [Topics in the Study of Literature]. 1959, Vol. 11, pp. 155–185. (In Russ.)
2. Lagutina, I.N. Dvizhenie “Burya i natisk” [“The Sturm und Drangˮ Movement]. Istoriya nemetskoi literatury: Novoe I noveishee vremya [History of German Literature: Modern and Late Modern Periods]. Moscow, 2014, pp. 252–257. (In Russ.)
3. Markin, A.V. Friedrich Schiller. Istoriya nemetskoi literatury: Novoe I noveishee vremya [History of German Literature: Modern and Late Modern periods]. Moscow, 2014, pp. 263–272. (In Russ.)
4. Safranski, R. Shiller, ili Otkrytie nemetskogo idealizma [Schiller: oder die Erfindung des Deutschen Idealismus]. Moscow, 2007, 551+[6] pp. (In Russ.)
5. Guthrie, J. Karl Moors satanische Rebellion. Schillers Theaterpraxis. Berlin, Boston u.a.: De Gruyter, 2020. S. 124–137. (In German)
6. Schiller, F. Die Räuber. [Stuttgart], Frankfurt u Leipzig, 1781. [8]+222 S. (In German)
7. Schiller, F. Sämtliche Werke. Bd. 1. München, 1962. [8]+858 S. (In German)
8. Schiller, F. Sobranie sochinenii v 7 t. [Collected Works in 7 Vols.] Vol. 1. Moscow, 1955. 779 p. (In Russ.)
9. Schiller, F. Werke: National-Ausgabe. Bd. 4. Weimar: Böhlau, 1983. 520 S. (In German)
10. Cherepanov, D.D. Tainye dvizheniya dushi i zhizn gosudarstva: problematika sil’nogo cheloveka v rannikh dramakh F. von Shillera [The Intimate Movements of the Soul and the Life of States: The Problem of the Strong Man in F. von Schiller’s Early Plays]. XVIII vek: intimnoe i publichnoe [The 18th Century: Intimate and Public]. St. Petersburg, 2021, pp. 478–488. (In Russ.)
11. Schiller, F. Sobranie sochinenii v 7 t. [Collected Works in 7 Vols.] Vol. 6. Moscow, 1957. 791 p. (In Russ.)
12. Schiller, F. Werke: National-Ausgabe. Bd. 3. Weimar: Böhlau, 1953. XXXI+463 S. (In German)
13. Milton, J. Poteryannyi rai. Vozvrashennyi rai [Paradise Lost. Paradise Regained]. Moscow, 2006. 860 p. (In Russ.)
14. Pichler, A. Chronik des großherzoglichen Hof- und Nationaltheaters in Mannheim. Mannheim: Bensheimer, 1879. [4]+359 S. (In German)
15. Wiese, B. v. Friedrich Schiller. Stuttgart: Metzler, 1978. XXI+866 S. (In German)
16. Almi, G.I. Ideologicheskii kompleks “Prestupleniya i nakazaniyaˮ i «Pis’ma o “Done Karloseˮ F. Shillera» [The Ideological Complex of Dostoevsky’s Crime and Punishment and Schiller’s “Briefe über Don Carlos”]. Dostoevskii: Materialy i issledovaniya [Dostoevsky: Materials and Research]. Vol. 13. St. Petersburg, 1996, pp. 88–97. (In Russ.)
17. Zherebin, A.I. Markiz Poza i “russkie malchikiˮ (K 250-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya Fridriha Shillera) [Marquis Posa and “Russian Boysˮ (The 250th Anniversary of Friedrich von Schiller’s Birth)]. Izvestiâ Rossijskoj akademii nauk. Seriâ literatury i âzyka [Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Sciences: Studies in Literature and Language]. 2009, Vol. 68, No. 6, pp. 3–7. (In Russ.)