Kstati (For Good Measure), Which is Not always a Good Measure: the Specifics of the Use of the Unit in Modern Oral Everyday Speech

The word kstati (by the way, for good measure) actively functions in oral everyday speech and can be perceived by listeners as a junk word. However, such use of this unit remains outside the scope of its lexicographic description. This article examines the semantic, functional and structural features of the word kstati on the material of speech corpora, as well as the author's notes of the spoken speech. Thus, in spoken speech kstati expresses subjective-modal meanings of ‘accentuation of the listener's attention’ and ‘inconsistency with the expected’. The main function of this word is connective. It can connect closely and distantly located replicas, as well as extralinguistic information and the speaker's utterance. In addition to the connective function, kstati can return the interlocutor's attention to what was previously said or introduce a new topic of conversation. The following uses of this unit seem inappropriate: 1) if the connection of the components of the utterance is clear only to the speaker, 2) in the meaning of ‘inconsistency with the expected’. In addition, the article describes the communicatives kstati, kstati da / da kstati, as well as such constructions as <kstati znaesh' (znaete), (chto)>, <kstati о + X>, <kstati naschet + N>, <kstati po povodu + N>, <kstati pro + N>. The information obtained can be used for a new lexicographic description of the word kstati and also be useful for replenishing linguistic databases. In addition, the results of the study can be used while teaching modern Russian, Russian as a foreign language or translating Russian texts into other languages.

Keywords

semantics, everyday speech, parasite-words, communicative, discourse formula, construction

Publication date

12.12.2023

Number of characters

19636

Cite

GOST	Prokopenko A. Kstati (For Good Measure), Which is Not always a Good Measure: the Specifics of the Use of the Unit in Modern Oral Everyday Speech // Russkaya Rech’ – 2023. – Issue 5 C. 32-44 [Electronic resource]. URL: http://ras.jes.su/rusrech/s013161170028365-0-1-en (circulation date: 19.05.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S013161170028365-0
MLA	Prokopenko, Anastasiia A "Kstati (For Good Measure), Which is Not always a Good Measure: the Specifics of the Use of the Unit in Modern Oral Everyday Speech." Russkaya Rech’ 5 (2023):32-44. DOI: 10.31857/S013161170028365-0
APA	Prokopenko A. (2023). Kstati (For Good Measure), Which is Not always a Good Measure: the Specifics of the Use of the Unit in Modern Oral Everyday Speech. Russkaya Rech’ (5), pp.32-44 DOI: 10.31857/S013161170028365-0

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 115

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Akhmanova O. S. Slovar' lingvisticheskikh terminov [Dictionary of linguistic terms]. Moscow, Sovetskaya Entsiklopediya Publ., 1966. 608 p.

2. Baranov A. N., Dobrovol'skii D. O. [Kstati and nekstati: to Dostoevsky's speech practices]. Russkii yazyk v nauchnom osveshchenii, 2018, no. 1 (35), pp. 33–45. (In Russ.)

3. Bogdanova N. V. [About the project of the dictionary of discursive units of Russian speech (based on the corpus material)]. Komp'yuternaya lingvistika i intellektual'nye tekhnologii: po materialam ezhegodnoi Mezhdunarodnoi konferentsii “Dialog” (Bekasovo, 30 maya – 3 iyunya 2012 g.) [Computational linguistics and intelligent technologies: based on the materials of the annual International Conference “Dialogue” (Bekasovo, May 30 – June 3, 2012)]. Issue 11 (18), vol. 1. Moscow, RGGU Publ., 2012, pp. 71–80. (In Russ.)

4. Bogdanova-Beglaryan N. V. [Pragmatemes in spoken everyday speech: Definition and general typology]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Rossiiskaya i zarubezhnaya filologiya, 2014, issue 3 (27), pp. 7–20. (In Russ.)

5. Bogdanova-Beglaryan N. V. [The core and periphery of the lexical and grammatical characteristics of the Russian word: about the fate of peripheral units]. Mir russkogo slova, 2020, no. 2, pp. 23–31. (In Russ.)

6. Bogdanova-Beglaryan N. V., Maslova E. R. [Russian contact verbs in oral spontaneous speech: vocabulary volume and functional and semantic diversity]. Acta Linguistica Petropolitana. Trudy Instituta lingvisticheskikh issledovanii / Gl. red. E. V. Golovko. Tom XV, chast' 3. I. Aktual'nye problemy izucheniya russkogo glagola / Red. M. D. Voeikova, S.V. Krasnoshchekova, E.G. Sosnovtseva; II. Varia [Acta Linguistica Petropolitana. Proc. of the Institute of Linguistic Studies, Russian Academy of Sciences / Ed.-in-chief E. V. Golovko. Vol. XV, part 3. I. Current issues in the study of Russian verb / Eds. M. D. Voeikova, S. V. Krasnoshchekova, E. G. Sosnovtseva; II. Varia]. St. Petersburg, Institute for Linguistic Studies, Russian Academy of Sciences, 2019, pp. 158–184. (In Russ.)

7. Fillmore Ch. J., Kay P., O’Connor M. C. Regularity and Idiomaticity in Grammatical Constructions: The Case of Let Alone. Language, 1988, vol. 64, no. 3, pp. 501–538. (In Eng.)

8. Levontina I. B. [Are the words pokhodu and pokhozhe similar?]. Russkaya Rech’, 2020, no. 6, pp. 28–39. (In Russ.)

9. Otkidych E. V. [Specifics of joining the right context by the inter-phrase conjunction “KSTATI, O + N6”]. Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki, 2015, no. 12-3 (54), pp. 145–148. (In Russ.)

10. Otkidych E. V. Funktsionirovanie tekstovykh skrep kstati i mezhdu prochim v monologicheskom i dialogicheskom tekste. Diss. kand. filol. nauk [Functioning of text bonds kstati and mezhdu prochim in monologue and dialogic text. PhD thesis]. Tomsk, 2017. 20 p.

11. Popova T. I. [“Echo”-reaction in dialogue: a corpus study of oral discourse (the gender aspect)]. LI Mezhdunarodnaya nauchnaya filologicheskaya konferentsiya imeni Lyudmily Alekseevny Verbitskoi. 14–21 marta 2023, Sankt-Peterburg. Sb. tezisov [LI International Scientific Philological Conference named after Lyudmila Alekseevna Verbitskaya. March 14–21, 2023, St. Petersburg. Collection of abstracts]. St. Petersburg, St. Petersburg St. Univ. Publ., 2023, pp. 1003–1004. (In Russ.)

12. Priemysheva M. N. [Colloquial vocabulary vs colloquial speech: trends and problems of lexicographic description]. Povsednevnaya rech' kak ob"ekt leksikografii (Trinadtsatye Shmelevskie chteniya). Tezisy dokladov mezhdunarodnoi konferentsii (23–25 fevralya 2020 g.) [Everyday speech as the object of lexicography (The Thirteenth Shmelev readings). Abstracts of reports of the International Conference (February 23–25, 2020)]. Moscow, RLI RAS, 2020, pp. 58–60. (In Russ.)

13. Rakhilina E. V., Kuznetsova Yu. L. Lingvistika konstruktsii / Otv. red. E.V. Rakhilina [Construction linguistics]. Moscow, Azbukovnik Publ., 2010. 584 p.

14. Russkaya grammatika / Gl. red. N. Yu. Shvedova [Russian grammar]. Vol. II. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1980. 709 p.

15. Sharonov I. A. [Communicatives and methods of their description]. Komp'yuternaya lingvistika i intellektual'nye tekhnologii: po materialam ezhegodnoi Mezhdunarodnoi konferentsii “Dialog” [Computational linguistics and intelligent technologies: based on the materials of the annual International Conference “Dialogue”]. Moscow, RGGU Publ., 2009, pp. 543–547. (In Russ.)

16. Zhukova S. Yu. Diskursivnye formuly russkogo yazyka v diakhronicheskom aspekte (na materiale XVIII–XXI vekov). Diss. kand. filol. nauk [Russian discourse formulae from a diachronic perspective (based on the data from 18th – to 21st cent.). PhD thesis]. Moscow, 2021. 283 p.