How Were Nonsuffixal Nouns Such as Призыв, Разгар, Отрыв Formed? A Dicussion Focuses on Direct- and Back-Formation

 
PIIS013161170015450-4-1
DOI10.31857/S013161170015450-4
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Affiliation: National Chengchi University
Address: Taiwan, Taipei
Affiliation: National Chengchi University
Address: Taiwan, Taipei
Journal nameRusskaya Rech’
EditionIssue 3
Pages19-30
Abstract

In Russian language, the prefi xal nonsuffi xal nouns account for roughly two percent. In the ancient texts, many of the nouns were calques from Greek. Over time, the methods of their formation and the scope of their use have expanded. Recently, the use of this kind of words in the colloquial speech has grown. Words, which were created through forward-formation, such as бег > забег, блеск > отблеск, свет > отсвет, внук > правнук, match Vinokur’s criterion, according to which, the derivatum is more complex than the generating word. It can be stimulated by calques of the foreign words. We suggest explaining cases of the violation of this criterion not by zero suffi xation, but by back-formation, according to James Murray, N. Shanskii and G. Nikolayev, for example, призывать > призыв, спасть > спад, обмануть > обман, вгибать > вгиб, вводить > ввод, отрывать > отрыв. These derivative nouns always appear later than their generating verbs. Back-formation develops as a result of redefi ning derivational connections and creating back-formational interrelationship, which occurs due to the enhanced relevance of the verbal predicative center of a sentence.

Keywordsgenerating word, derivatum, motivation, back-formation, relative chronology, zero suffixes
Received26.06.2021
Publication date26.06.2021
Number of characters20322
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 693

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Avanesov R. I. (ch. ed.). Slovar' drevnerusskogo yazyka (XI–XIV vv.): v 10 t. [Dictionary of Old Russian language (11th – 14th century). In 10 vols.]. Vol. 1. Moscow, Russkii Yazyk Publ., 1988. 526 p. Available at: http://rus-yaz.niv.ru/doc/old-russian-dictionary/index.htm (accessed 05.05.2021).

2. Balalykina E. A., Nikolaev G. A. Russkoe slovoobrazovanie: uchebnoe posobie [Russian word-formation textbook] / Ed. F. M. Abubakirova. Kazan, Kazan Univ. Publ., 1985. 184 p.

3. Barkhudarov S. G. (ch. ed.). Slovar' russkogo yazyka XI?XVII vv. [Dictionary of the Russian language in 11 th – 17th century]. Issue 5. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1978. 392 p.

4. Bogatova G. A. (ch. ed.). Slovar' russkogo yazyka XI?XVII vv. [Dictionary of the Russian language in 11 th – 17th century]. Issue 26. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 2002. 278 p.

5. Dement'ev V. V. [The active way of metaphorization in modern colloquial speech (nonffixal verbal derivatum)]. Povsednevnaya rech' kak ob"ekt leksikografii (Trinadcatye Shmelevskie chteniya). Tezisy dokladov mezhdunar. konf. (23?25 fevralya 2020 g.) [Daily speech as an object of lexicography (13th Shmelev Readings)]. Resp. ed. L. P. Krysin. Moscow, Vinogradov Russian Language Institute RAS, 2020, pp. 23?24. (In Russ.) Available at: http://www.ruslang.ru/doc/smelevskie-thesis.pdf (accessed 01.09.2020).

6. Dobrodomov I. G., Kamchatnov A. M. [Derivatological signs]. Drevnyaya Rus'. Voprosy medievistiki, 2014, no. 3 (57), pp. 13–20. (In Russ.)

7. Evgen'eva A. P. (ed.). Slovar' russkogo yazyka: v 4 t. [Dictionary of the Russian language: In 4 vols.]. Moscow, Russkii Yazyk Publ., Poligrafresursy Publ., 1999. Available at: http://feb-web.ru/feb/mas/mas-abc/default.asp (accessed 05.05.2021).

8. Gekkina E. N. [On the history of the words sosul’a and sosul’ka]. Russkaya rech', 2019, no. 5, pp. 22?33. (In Russ.)

9. Krys’ko V. B. (ch. ed.). Slovar' russkogo yazyka XI?XVII vv. [Dictionary of the Russian Language in 11th – 17th century]. Issue 27. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 2006. 276 p.

10. Natsional'nyi korpus russkogo yazyka [Russian National Corpus]. Available at: www.ruscorpora.ru (accessed 05.05.2021).

11. Nikolaev G. A. [Back relatedness and back word-formation]. Russkoe i slavyanskoe slovoobrazovanie: Opera selecta [Russian and Slavic word-formation: Opera selecta]. Ed. by K. R. Galiullin. Kazan, Kazan Univ. Publ., 2011, pp. 44?50. (In Russ.)

12. Sreznevskii I. I. Materialy dlya slovarya drevnerusskogo yazyka po pis’mennym pamyatnikam [Materials for the dictionary of the Old Russian language on written monuments]. Vol. ?II. St. Petersburg, Publ. House of Imper. Akademy of Sciences, 1912. 1684 col.

13. Shanskii N. M. Ocherki po russkomu slovoobrazovaniyu [Essays on Russian word-formation]. 2nd ed. Moscow, URSS Publ., 2005. 332 p.

14. Shmelev D. N. (ch. ed.). Slovar' russkogo yazyka XI?XVII vv. [Dictionary of the Russian language in 11th – 17th century]. Issue 12. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1987. 381 p. Available at: http://rus-yaz.niv.ru/doc/old-russian-dictionary/index.htm (accessed 05.05.2021).

15. Vinokur G. O. [Slavisms in the modern Russian literary language]. Izbrannye raboty po russkomu yazyku [Selected works on the Russian language]. Moscow, Uchpedgiz Publ., 1959, pp. 419–442. Available at: http://www.danefae.org/lib/vinokur/1959/slovoobr.htm (accessed 02.06.2021).

16. Yu Tzu-Lan. Slovoobrazovanie russkih pristavochnyh imen sushchestvitel'nyh bez suffiksov i ih uchastie v mental'nosti. Diss. mag. gumanit. nauk [Word-formation of Russian prefixal nonsuffixal nouns and their function in mental]. Taipei, 2020. 323 p.

17. Zubova L. V., Men'shikova Yu. V. Morfemika i slovoobrazovanie sovremennogo russkogo yazyka [Morphemics and word-formation of the modern Russian language]. St. Petersburg, Department of philology, St. Petersburg University Publ., 2014. 255 p.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up