Official Language: “How Stuffy!”

 
PIIS013161170014707-6-1
DOI10.31857/S013161170014707-6
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Affiliation: St. Petersburg State University
Address: Russian Federation, St. Petersburg
Affiliation: St. Petersburg State University
Address: Russia, St. Petersburg
Journal nameRusskaya Rech’
EditionIssue 2
Pages35-43
Abstract

The article presents some ideas of the authors about the history of Russian offi cial speech, the rule of the formation of meaningful impersonality in documentary texts and the ways to achieve clarity and accuracy, proclaimed as the most important for offi cial communication in general. The foundation of new offi cial speech started at the beginning of the 18th century, in the reign of Peter the Great. His government reforms with an orientation towards the Western model of the “state-mechanism” were continued by his followers, which was refl ected in the language of state communication — in the Russian offi cial language of the new periods: the rigidity of state machinery led to the language becoming more and more depersonalized. It didn’t have a personal touch anymore. The fi nal variant of the new offi cial language, which remains fundamentally unchanged to this day, falls on the reign of Alexander I. As a result of the emergence of ministries instead of collegia, large-scale offi ce work arises, requiring a strict hierarchy in the workfl ow, where papers gradually replaced actions. The language of the offi cial sphere, following the reforms of social life, also acquires many new qualities, the main of which are impersonality, emotionality, the desire for accuracy.

Keywordsofficial style, document text, new era language, depersonalization of official language
AcknowledgmentThe study was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (project № 20-012-00338).
Received25.06.2021
Publication date26.06.2021
Number of characters14390
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 570

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Kozhina M. N. (ed.). Stilisticheskii enciklopedicheskii slovar' russkogo yazyka [Stylistic encyclopedic dictionary of the Russian language]. Moscow, Nauka, Flinta Publ. 2011. 696 p.

2. Kolesov V. V. Russkaya rech': Vchera. Segodnya. Zavtra [Russian speech: Yesterday. Today. Tomorrow]. St. Petersburg, Yuna Publ., 1998. 245 p.

3. Litvak B. G. [On the laws of the evolution of office documentation in the 18th?19th centuries (To the question)]. Problemy istochnikovedeniya istorii SSSR i special'nyh istoricheskih disciplin: stat'i i materialy [Problems of source study of the history of the USSR and special historical disciplines: articles and materials]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1984, pp. 48–55. (In Russ.)

4. Rudnev D. V. [“Pod"yacheskii slog” in the assessment of A. P. Sumarokov (about the features of the clerical language of the middle of the 18th century)]. Literaturnaya kul'tura Rossii XVIII veka [Literary culture of Russia in the 18th century]. Issue 7. St. Petersburg, Gelikon Plyus Publ., 2017, pp. 50–77. (In Russ.)

5. Sadova T. S., Rudnev D. V. [From the history of Russian petitioning genres: The linguistic aspect]. Uchenye zapiski PetrGU [Proceedings of Petrozavodsk State University], 2020, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 8–14.? (In Russ.)

6. Trosheva S. B. [Literary language]. Stilisticheskii enciklopedicheskii slovar' russkogo yazyka [Stylistic encyclopedic dictionary of the Russian language]. Moscow, Nauka, Flinta Publ., 2011, pp. 208?209. (In Russ.)

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up