Problems of Research of Abilities in Modern Russian Psychology: In Search of a New Theory

 
PIIS020595920027081-5-1
DOI10.31857/S020595920027081-5
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Occupation: Head of general and social psychology chair
Affiliation: Yaroslavl State Pedagogical University named after K.D. Ushinsky
Address: Russian Federation, Yaroslavl
Occupation: Head of the Faculty of Education
Affiliation: Yaroslavl State Pedagogical University named after K.D. Ushinsky
Address: Russian Federation, Yaroslavl
Occupation: Director
Affiliation: Institute of Psychology, Russian Academy of Sciences
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Occupation: Research Professor of Faculty of Social Sciences of the School of Psychology
Affiliation: National Research University “Higher School of Economics”
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Journal namePsikhologicheskii zhurnal
EditionVolume 44 Issue 4
Pages5-14
Abstract

The state of the problem of abilities in the modern history of Russian psychological science is discussed. It is argued that despite the recognition by the psychological community of the high functional significance of abilities as a factor of achievement in various types of activity, as a factor in human development, the real productivity of research in the field of the psychology of abilities remains quite low. It is shown that in the recent history of Russian psychology there is a decline in the interest of the scientific community in the development of this problem. This is a consequence of a longer process of low-intensity research of abilities in Soviet psychology. Based on the analysis of publications in leading psychological journals for the period 1991–2022, an attempt has been made to systematize research in the field of psychology of abilities. Two approaches to research analysis were used: methodological analysis (characterization of research by type, subject, method, object), functional analysis (characterization based on the use of abilities as an object of research and as an object of formation). The author substantiates the statement that the decrease in the intensity of research in the field of psychology of abilities is a consequence of the lack of a “working” theory of abilities in psychological science, which allows solving the problems of determining the structure of abilities and their interaction, their development, functioning and formation.

Keywordsabilities, psychology, ability theory, methodology, explanation, integration
AcknowledgmentThe study was supported by the Russian Science Foundation grant №22-28-00089, https://rscf.ru/project/22-28-00089/
Received12.08.2023
Publication date02.10.2023
Number of characters25650
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 111

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Ancupov A.Ja., Kandybovich S.L., Timchenko G.N. Problemy otechestvennoj psikhologii. Ukazatel' 1410 doktorskikh dissertacij (1935–2019). Moscow: Prospekt, 2020. (In Russian)

2. Voronin A.N., Kochkina O.M. Struktura jazykovykh sposobnostej v processe osvoenija diskursivnoj praktiki. Ehksperimental'naja psikhologija. 2009. V. 2. № 3. P. 92–110. (In Russian)

3. Druzhinin V.N. Situacionnyj podkhod k psikhodiagnostike sposobnostej. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 1991. V. 12. № 2. P. 94–104. (In Russian)

4. Zhuravlev A.L., Jurevich A.V. Vmesto vvedenija: osnovnye tipy tendencij razvitija psikhologii. Novye tendencii i perspektivy psikhologicheskoj nauki. Moscow: Izd-vo “Institut psikhologii RAN”, 2019. P. 5–8. (In Russian)

5. Mazilov V.A., Slepko Ju.N. Sposobnosti i odarennost' v psikhologii: sovremennoe sostojanie otechestvennykh i zarubezhnykh issledovanij. Psikhologija. Zhurnal Vysshej shkoly ehkonomiki. 2021. V. 18. № 3. P. 598–622. (In Russian)

6. Makhmutova E.N., Andreeva M.M., Dmitrenko T.A. Social'no-psikhologicheskij trening kak sredstvo formirovanija kommunikativnoj kompetentnosti studentov-menedzherov. Integracija obrazovanija. 2018. V. 22. № 1 (90). P. 91–106. (In Russian)

7. Melekhin A.I. Metakognitivnye sposobnosti v pozhilom vozraste: specifika i prediktory. Ehksperimental'naja psikhologija. 2019. V. 12. № 3. P. 47–62. (In Russian)

8. Petrenko V.F., Mitina O.V. Metodika “Skazochnyj semanticheskij differencial”: diagnosticheskie vozmozhnosti. Psikhologicheskaja nauka i obrazovanie. 2018. V. 23. № 6. P. 41–54. (In Russian)

9. Popova S.I. Razvitie sposobnosti podrostka k samoreguljacii v obrazovatel'nom processe shkoly. Psikhologicheskaja nauka i obrazovanie. 2017. V. 22. № 6. P. 99–108. (In Russian)

10. Stepanov S.Ju., Rjabova I.V., Gavrilova E.V. Vlijanie cifrovoj sredy i dopolnitel'nogo obrazovanija na intellektual'nye i kreativnye sposobnosti shkol'nikov. Voprosy psikhologii. 2021. № 1. P. 61–70. (In Russian)

11. Tikhomirova T.N., Misozhnikova E.B., Malykh S.B. Kognitivnye i reguljatornye prediktory uspeshnosti vypolnenija testov obshhikh sposobnostej v starshem doshkol'nom vozraste. Sibirskij psikhologicheskij zhurnal. 2020. № 75. P. 97–114. (In Russian)

12. Tuchina O.D., Shustov D.I., Agibalova T.V., Shustova S.A. Narushenija prospektivnoj sposobnosti kak vozmozhnyj patogeneticheskij mekhanizm alkogol'noj zavisimosti. Konsul'tativnaja psikhologija i psikhoterapija. 2019. V. 27. № 1 (103). P. 79–101. (In Russian)

13. Ushakov D.V. Psikhologija intellekta i odarennosti. Moscow: Izd-vo “Institut psikhologii RAN”, 2011. (In Russian)

14. Fatikhova L.F., Sajfutdijarova E.F. Razlichija kharakteristik bezopasnosti uchashhikhsja s mental'nymi narushenijami v podrostkovom i junosheskom vozraste. Integracija obrazovanija. 2020. T. 24. № 2 (99). P. 252–275. (In Russian)

15. Kholodnaja M.A. Psikhologija intellekta: Paradoksy issledovanija. Moscow: Jurajt, 2019. (In Russian)

16. Kholodnaja M.A. Svetlye i temnye storony refleksii i arefleksii: ehffekt rasshheplenija. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2022. V. 43. № 4. P. 15–26. (In Russian)

17. Kholodnaja M.A., Trifonova A.V., Volkova N.Eh., Sipovskaja Ja.I. Metodiki diagnostiki ponjatijnykh sposobnostej. Ehksperimental'naja psikhologija. 2019. V. 12. № 3. P. 105–118. (In Russian)

18. Khokhlov N.A., Kovjazina M.S. Mezhpolusharnye i vnutripolusharnye mezhmodal'nye pereshifrovki kak faktor vyrazhennosti matematicheskikh sposobnostej v junosheskom vozraste. Voprosy psikhologii. 2017. № 4. P. 153–163. (In Russian)

19. Cheremoshkina L.V., Osinina T.N. Mnemicheskie sposobnosti v period perekhoda ot podrostkovogo k junosheskomu vozrastu (po materialam longitjudnogo issledovanija). Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2020. V. 41. № 6. P. 35–47. (In Russian)

20. Shadrikov V.D. K novoj psikhologicheskoj teorii sposobnostej i odarennosti. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2019. V. 40. № 2. P. 15–26. (In Russian)

21. Shadrikov V.D. Sposobnosti i odarennost' cheloveka. Moscow: Izd-vo “Institut psikhologii RAN”, 2019. (In Russian)

22. Shadrikov V.D. Sistemogenez mental'nykh kachestv cheloveka. Moscow: Izd-vo “Institut psikhologii RAN”, 2022. (In Russian)

23. Shheblanova E.I. Psikhologicheskie osobennosti shkol'noj adaptacii intellektual'no odarennykh podrostkov. Voprosy psikhologii. 2017. № 3. P. 16–27. (In Russian)

24. Glazunova O.I., Gromyko Yu.V. Mastering way of action as an integral indicator of the development of intellectual abilities in learning: to the problem of constructing an activity diagnostics of abilities. Cultural-Historical Psychology. 2021. V. 17. № 3. P. 58–68.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up