J. KUHL’S AND A. FUHRMAN’S SELF-GOVERNMENT TEST: PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF RUSSIAN LANGUAGE VERSION

Occupation: associate professor, general psychology chair, psychological department, MSU.E-
Affiliation: Lomonosov Moscow State University
Address: Russian Federation,

E. Rasskazova

Occupation: associate professor of clinical psychology department, leading research fellow of international laboratory of positive psychology and personality, HSE
Affiliation:
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Higher School of Economics (National Research University)
Address: Russian Federation

Journal name

Psikhologicheskii zhurnal

Edition

Volume 40 Issue 2

Pages

111-127

Abstract

Despite progress in psychology of self-regulation the problem of correspondence of different approaches and methods of its diagnostics are still controversial. Approbation of questionnaire for self-government study that was proposed by J. Kuhl in the context of self-regulation model and Personality systems interaction theory(PSI-theory) is the objective of the work. The questionnaire consists of 13 scales which are combined in 5 blocks (self-regulation, self-control, volition development, sensitivity to oneself, general life stress).497 students of psychological and pedagogical departments and 490 adults participated in the research. All respondents filled out self-regulation questionnaire; 262 respondents filled out activity self-regulation questionnaire; 121 – Big Five test and modified variant of Action-State Orientation questionnaire; 390 – coping behavior test (COPE). 39 persons re-completed the questionnaire in 2-3 weeks. Sufficient reliability (0.63–0.86, except sense experiencing scale), test-retest reliability and factor structure of questionnaire scales, correlations of scales with peculiarities of activity self-organization (purposefulness, regularity, persistence, self-organization), orientation at state in failure and planning, as well as with strategies of active rethinking and coping with stress situation are demonstrated. Thus, the questionnaire for self-regulation study can be considered as reliable and valid one and can be used in studies in which differentiation and comparison of different aspects of activity and state self-regulation is required.

Keywords

J. Kuhl’s model of self-management, Personality systems interaction theory, (PSI-theory), self-government test by J. Kuhl and A. Fuhrman, psychodiagnostics.

Acknowledgment

The research is supported by RSF grant, project 16-18-10439 “System-dynamic analysis of activity regulation”

Received

24.03.2019

Publication date

25.03.2019

Number of characters

38153

Cite

GOST	Mitina O., Rasskazova E. J. KUHL’S AND A. FUHRMAN’S SELF-GOVERNMENT TEST: PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF RUSSIAN LANGUAGE VERSION // Psikhologicheskii zhurnal – 2019. – V. 40. – Issue 2 C. 111-127 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://psy.jes.su/S020595920004061-3-1 (circulation date: 05.11.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S020595920004061-3
MLA	Mitina, O., Rasskazova, E. "J. KUHL’S AND A. FUHRMAN’S SELF-GOVERNMENT TEST: PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF RUSSIAN LANGUAGE VERSION." Psikhologicheskii zhurnal 40.2 (2019):111-127. DOI: 10.31857/S020595920004061-3
APA	Mitina O., Rasskazova E. (2019). J. KUHL’S AND A. FUHRMAN’S SELF-GOVERNMENT TEST: PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF RUSSIAN LANGUAGE VERSION. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal 40(2), pp.111-127 DOI: 10.31857/S020595920004061-3

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 20, views: 6161

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Vasil'ev I.A. Mitina O.V., SHapkin S.A. Kontrol' za dejstviem kak sostavlyayushchaya lichnostnogo potenciala // Lichnostnyj potencial: struktura i diagnostika. / Ed. D.A. Leont'ev. Moscow: Smysl, 2011. P. 330–359. (In Russian)

2. Dikaya L.A. Psihologiya samoregulyacii funkcional'nogo sostoyaniya sub"ekta v ehkstremal'nyh usloviyah deyatel'nosti: Diss. … d.psihol.nauk. Moscow, 2002. (In Russian)

3. Konopkin O.A. Psihologicheskie mekhanizmy samoregulyacii deyatel'nosti. Moscow: Lenand, 2011. (In Russian)

4. Kornilova T.V. Intellektual'no-lichnostnyj potencial cheloveka v usloviyah neopredelennosti i riska. St. Petersburg: Nestor-Istoriya, 2015. (In Russian)

5. Leont'ev D.A. Lichnostnyj potencial kak potencial samoregulyacii // Lichnostnyj potencial: struktura i diagnostika. / Ed. D.A. Leont'ev. Moscow: Smysl, 2011. P. 107–130. (In Russian)

6. Mandrikova E.YU. Razrabotka oprosnika samoorganizacii deyatel'nosti (OSD) // Psihologicheskaya diagnostika. 2010. №2. P. 87–111. (In Russian)

7. Mitina O.V. Modelirovanie latentnyh izmenenij c pomoshch'yu strukturnyh uravnenij // EHksperimental'naya psihologiya. 2008. №1. P. 131–148. (In Russian)

8. Mitina O.V. Teoriya lichnosti kak vzaimodejstvie sistem // Predislovie k perevoduknigi Kul' YU., SHtorh M. Sila sobstvennogo YA. Sem' Psihogimnastik dlya bessoznatel'nogo. Har'kov: Gumanitarnyj Centr, 2015. P. 7–35. (In Russian)

9. Mitina O.V., Rasskazova E.I. Refleksivnaya orientaciya i ee diagnostika v structure kontrolya za dejstviem // Psihologicheskij zhurnal. 2014. V. 35. №2. P. 118–128. (In Russian)

10. Morosanova V.I. Individual'nyj stil' samoregulyacii: fenomen, struktura i funkcii proizvol'noj aktivnosti cheloveka. Moscow: Nauka, 2001. (In Russian)

11. Morosanova V.I. Stil' samoregulyacii povedeniya (SSPM). Rukovodstvo. Moscow: Kogito-Centr, 2004. (In Russian)

12. Morosanova V.I., Bondarenko I.N. Obshchaya sposobnost' k samoregulyacii: operacionalizaciya fenomena i ehksperimental'nyj podhod k diagnostike ee razvitiya // Voprosy psihologii. 2016. №2. P. 109–123. (In Russian)

13. Nikolaeva V.V. Osobennosti lichnosti pri somaticheskih zabolevaniyah // Sokolova E.T., Nikolaeva V.V. Osobennosti lichnosti pri pogranichnyh rasstrojstvah i somaticheskih zabolevaniyah. Moscow: SvR-Argus, 1995. P. 207–357. (In Russian)

14. Nikolaeva V.V. Vliyanie hronicheskoj bolezni na psihiku. Psihologicheskoe issledovanie. Moscow: Izdatel'stvo Moskovskogo universiteta, 1987. (In Russian)

15. Oboznov A.A. Psihologicheskaya regulyaciya operatorskoj deyatel'nosti. Moscow: Izd-vo “Institut psihologii RAN”, 2003. (In Russian)

16. Osin E.N., Rasskazova E.I., Neyaskina YU.YU., Dorfman L.YA., Aleksandrova L.A. Operacionalizaciya pyatifaktornoj modeli lichnostnyh chert na rossijskoj vyborke // Psihologicheskaya diagnostika. 2015. №3. P. 80–104. (In Russian)

17. Prohorov A.O. Samoregulyaciya psihicheskih sostoyanij: fenomenologiya, mekhanizmy, zakonomernosti. Moscow: PerSe, 2005. (In Russian)

18. Rasskazova E.I., Gordeeva T.O., Osin E.N. Koping-strategii v structure deyatel'nosti i samoregulyacii: psihometricheskie harakteristiki i vozmozhnosti primeneniya metodiki COPE // Psihologiya. ZHurnal Vysshej shkoly ehkonomiki. 2013. N 10(1). P. 82–118. (In Russian)

19. Hekkhauzen H. Motivaciya i deyatel'nost'. Moscow: Smysl, St. Petersburg: Piter, 2003. (In Russian)

20. Baumann, N., Kuhl, J.How to resist temptation: the effects of external control versus autonomy support on self-regulatory dynamics // Journal of Personality. 2005. Vol. 73. N 2. P. 443–470.

21. Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D., Tice, D. M. The strength model of self-control// Current Directions in Psychological Science. 2007. Vol. 16.P. 396–403.

22. Brown T. Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. The Guilford Press: N. Y., London, 2006.

23. Byrne, B. Adaptation of assessment scales in cross-national research: issues, guidelines and caveats // International Perspectives in Psychology: Research, Practice, Consultation. 2016. Vol. 5. No. 1. P. 51–65.

24. Carver, C. S., Scheier, M. F. On the self-regulation of behavior. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1998.

25. Deci, E. L., Ryan, R. M. The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior // Psychological Inquiry. 2000. Vol. 11. P. 227–268.

26. Forstmeier S., Rüddel H. Measuring Volitional Competences: Psychometric Properties of a Short Form of the Volitional Components Questionnaire (VCQ) in a Clinical Sample. // Psychology Journal. 2008. Vol. 1.P. 66–77.

27. Gollwitzer, P. M., Sheeran, P. Implementation intentions and goal achievement: A meta-analysis of effects and processes //Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. 2006. Vol. 38. P.69–119.

28. Groepel, P., Kuhl, J.Having time for life activities: Life balance and self-regulation // ZeitschriftfürGesundheitspsychologie. 2006. Vol. 14. N 2. P. 54–63.

29. Kuhl J., Alsleben P.TOP Manual.Münster: Sonderpunkt, 2012.

30. Kuhl, J. Action and state orientation: Psychometric properties of the action control scales (ACS-90). //Volition and personality: Action versus state orientation / Eds. J. Kuhl, J. Beckmann.Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe, 1994.P. 47–59.

31. Kuhl, J., Fuhrman, A. Decomposing self-regulation and self-control: The Volitional Components Inventory // Motivation and self-regulation across the life span. / Eds. J. Heckhausen, C.Dweck.New York, NY, US: Cambridge University Press,1998. P. 15–49.

32. Kuhl, J., Kazen, M., Koole, S.L.Putting self-regulation theory into practice:a user’s manual // Applied Psychology: An International Review. 2006. 55(3). P. 408–418.

33. Kuhl, J., Koole, S.L. Workings of the will: A functional approach // Handbook of experimental existential psychology / Eds. J. Greenberg, S.L. Koole, T. Pyszczynski. New York: Guilford Press, 2004. P. 411–430.

34. Leventhal, H., Brissette, I., Leventhal, E. The common-sense model of self-regulation of health and illness // The self-regulation of health and illness behavior / Eds. L. D. Cameron, H. Leventhal. New York: Routledge, 2003. P. 42–65.

35. Little, T.D. Longitudinal structural equation modeling. N-Y: The Guiford Press. 2013.

36. Pečjak S. Košir K. Personality, Motivational Factors And Difficulties In Career Decision-Making In Secondary School Students. //Psihologijsketeme. 2007. Vol. 16. N 1. P. 141–158.

37. Sheldon, K. Becoming oneself: the central role of self-concordant goal selection // Personality and Social Psychology Review. 2014. Vol. 18. No. 4. P. 349–365.

38. Quirin, M., Kuhl, J. Positive affect, self-access, and health: Research based on PSI theory //ZeitschriftfürGesundheitspsychologie. 2008. Vol. 16. N 3. P. 139–142.