Federalism in historical and state-studying dimension

 
PIIS013207690002205-7-1
DOI10.31857/S013207690002205-7
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Affiliation: Saratov branch of the Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Address: Russian Federation
Affiliation: Penza State University
Address: Russian Federation
Affiliation: International Academy of Comparative Law
Address: Russian Federation, Penza
Journal nameGosudarstvo i pravo
EditionIssue 12
Pages116-127
Abstract

In the article elements of federalism are defined and model of federalism is described that contains list of factors of influence, stages of the development and its key characteristics (including historical type of federalism). Each country model is unique but comparison makes it possible to distinguish common features and tendencies. Historical and State studying approach is the beginning of the comparison that per meats to turn to analysis of the legal texts and legal practice and then to the role of parties and party systems and public opinion in the development of federalism.

Keywordsfederalism, models of federalism, state-studying analysis of federalism, comparative federalism
Publication date22.12.2018
Cite   Download pdf To download PDF you should sign in
Размещенный ниже текст является ознакомительной версией и может не соответствовать печатной

views: 501

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Anderen Dzh. Federalizm. Vvedenie. M., 2009. S. 7.

2. Haberstam D. Federalism: Thery, Policy and Law // Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law. Oxford, 2013. P. 577.

3. Marks G., Hoogh L., Scharel A.H. The Rise Regional Authority. A comparative study of 42 democracies. London and New York, 2010. P. 52.

4. Danilov S.Yu. Ehvolyutsiya kanadskogo federalizma. M., 2012. S. 10.

5. Chirkin V.E. Modeli sovremennogo federalizma: sravnitel'nyj analiz // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 1994. № 8. S. 154.

6. Kremyanskaya E.A. Teoriya i praktika federalizma: sravnitel'no-pravovoe issledovanie. M., 2015, S. 39.

7. Bojko Yu.P. Federalizm kak printsip gosudarstvennogo ustrojstva: voprosy teorii // Evrazijskij yurid. zhurnal. 2013. № 1. S. 80.

8. Farukshin M.Kh. Federalizm: teoreticheskie i prikladnye aspekty. M., 2004. S. 51.

9. Golubeva L.A., Chernokov A.Eh. Sravnitel'noe gosudarstvovedenie. SPb., 2009. S. 272.

10. Farukshin M.Kh. Federalizm: teoreticheskie i prikladnye aspekty. M., 2004. S. 52.

11. Ivshina I.N. Sozdanie federativnogo gosudarstva. Sravnitel'no-pravovoe issledovanie. M., 2014. S. 28.

12. Due T.R. American Federalism. Competition. Among Governments. Lexington, 1990. P. 7.

13. Dzhanda K., Berri D.M., Goldman Dzh., Khula K.V. Trudnym putem demokratii. Protsess gosudarstvennogo upravleniya v SShA. M., 2006. S. 126.

14. Lafitskij V. Konstitutsionnyj stroj SShA. 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. M., 2011. S. 182–351.

15. Bowling C.J. and Pickerill M. Fragmented Federalism: The State of American Federalism 2012013 // Publius: The Journal of Federalism. Advance access published June 12. 2013. P. 1–32.

16. Shul'tse Kh. Kratkaya istoriya Germanii. M., 2004. S. 144.

17. Vasil'ev V.I. Germanskij federalizm: problemy razvitiya. M., 2000. S. 242, 243.

18. Stolyarov M.V. Predislovie // Biryukov S.V., Barsukov A.M. Bel'giya: tupik federalizma ili krizis ego razvitiya. M., 2010. S. 5, 6.

19. Satarov G. Formal'nye i neformal'nye aspekty v protsesse transformatsii sudebnoj vlasti // Pravo i pravoprimenenie v Rossii: mezhdistsiplinarnye issledovaniya. M., 2011. S. 139.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up