Russia has Come More Than Twice as Nearer to Us: The 1896 Moscow Treaty in the Chinese Scholars’ Perceptions

Occupation: Deputy Director
Affiliation: Institute of Oriental Studies, Russian Academy of Sciences
Address: 12, Rozhdestvenka str., Moscow, 107031, Russian Federation

Journal name

Problemy Dalnego Vostoka

Edition

Issue 4

Pages

151-163

Abstract

Was the 1896 “Moscow Treaty” (“Sino-Russian Secret Treaty”) an unequal one? The Russian assessments of this Treaty, signed by A.B. Lobanov-Rostovsky, S.Y. Witte and Li Hongzhang on May 22.05/03.06.1896, during Li's visit to celebrate the coronation of Nicholas II in Moscow, is a special topic, already generally explored in our publications. These assessments vary a lot — from negative to generally positive and mixed ones (it was not unequal, had pros and cons for both sides). The positive and mixed assessments are dominating in the domestic studies, which does not mean that this so much disputed topic is terminated in Russian historiography. As for the Chinese historiography, a stereotype exists that almost all Chinese experts perceive and evaluate the “Secret Treaty” purely negatively, as an unequal one. In fact, the conclusions and assessments of the Chinese experts nowadays, just as 120 years ago, are not at all unified or totally negative, but, very like the Russian historiography, contain the whole range of assessments — from negative to positive and the mixed ones. The very existence of this broad spectrum, along with the updating and expansion of concrete arguments, indicates that the discussions about the essence of the “Secret Treaty”, as much as the assessment of Li Hongzhang’s actions are still far from being completed in China’s historiography. The reason to issue this article was a bibliographic review of Chinese studies on the China-Eastern Railway (CER) topic, published by Ma Weiyun and Cui Jianping, a pair of prominent Harbin historians, in the “Discussion Tribune” Section of the Russian “Problems of the Far East” Journal (2021, No. 6).

Keywords

China, KVZhD (CER), Li Hongzhang, Moscow Treaty, Qing, Russia, Secret Treaty, 1896

Acknowledgment

Institute of Oriental Studies Russian Academy of Sciences

Received

21.07.2023

Publication date

01.09.2023

Number of characters

31807

Cite

GOST	Golovachev V. “Russia has Come More Than Twice as Nearer to Us”: The 1896 Moscow Treaty in the Chinese Scholars’ Perceptions // Problemy Dalnego Vostoka – 2023. – Issue 4 C. 151-163 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://pdv.jes.su/S013128120027111-3-1 (circulation date: 19.05.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S013128120027111-3
MLA	Golovachev, Valentin "“Russia has Come More Than Twice as Nearer to Us”: The 1896 Moscow Treaty in the Chinese Scholars’ Perceptions." Problemy Dalnego Vostoka 4 (2023):151-163. DOI: 10.31857/S013128120027111-3
APA	Golovachev V. (2023). “Russia has Come More Than Twice as Nearer to Us”: The 1896 Moscow Treaty in the Chinese Scholars’ Perceptions. Problemy Dalnego Vostoka (4), pp.151-163 DOI: 10.31857/S013128120027111-3

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 146

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Golovachev V.Ts. «On byl drugom nashego otechestva»: obraz i rol' Li Hunchzhana kak podpisanta Simonosekskogo i Moskovskogo dogovorov 1895–1896 gg. (rossijskaya percepciya) ("He was a friend of our Fatherland": the image and role of Li Hongzhang as a signatory of the Simonoseki and Moscow Treaties of 1895–1896. (Russian perception)). Vostok. Afro-Aziatskie obshchestva: istoriya i sovremennost'. 2022. Vyp. 5. S. 97–109. (In Russ.)

2. Kryukov V.M., Kryukov M.V. KVZHD 1929. Ekho i vzryv. M.: IV RAN, 2017. (In Russ.)

3. Lenin V.I. Polnoe sobranie sochinenij (The complete works). Moskva: Gospolitizdat, 1958–1965. T. 51. (In Russ.)

4. Lyudi i sud'by. Bibliograficheskij slovar' vostokovedov — zhertv politicheskogo terrora v sovetskij period (1917–1991) (Humans and destinies. Bibliographic dictionary of Orientalists — victims of political terror during the Soviet period (1917–1991)). SPb.: Peterburgskoe vostokovedenie, 2003. S. 101–102. (In Russ.)

5. Lyan Cichao. Li Hongchzhang, ili Politicheskaya istoriya Kitaya za poslednie 40 let: soch. Lyancichao; per. s kit. A.N. Voznesenskij i Chzhanchintun; s predisl. Chzhanchintuna (Li Hongzhang, or The Political History of China over the past 40 years). Sankt-Peterburg: V. Berezovskij, 1905. 346 s.

6. Ma V., Cuj C. Harakteristika issledovanij kitajskimi uchenymi Kitajsko-Vostochnoj zheleznoj dorogi (Characteristics of researches of the China-Eastern Railway by the Chinese scientists). Problemy Dal'nego Vostoka. 2021. No. 6. S. 63–76. URL: https://pdv.jes.su/s013128120017866–3–1 (accessed: 07.07.2023). (In Russ.)

7. Romanov B.A. Rossiya v Manchzhurii (1892–1906): ocherki po istorii vneshnej politiki samoderzhaviya v epohu imperializma (Russia in Manchuria (1892–1906): Essays on History of the Autocratic Monarchy’s Foreign Policy in the Imperialism Era). L.: Len. vost. in-t, 1928. 608 s. https://pgpb.ru/digitization/document/1982 (in Russ.)

8. Romanova G.N. Osnovnye koncepcii kitajskoj istoriografii o rossijskih investiciyah i predprinimatel'stve v ekonomike Severo-Vostochnogo Kitaya (rubezh XIX—XX v.) (The main concepts of Chinese historiography about Russian investments and entrepreneurship in the economy of Northeast China (the turn of the XIX—XX century)). OiGK. XXVIII n. k. Tezisy i doklady. M.: IV RAN, 1998. Tchast. 2. S. 367–374. (In Russ.)

9. Sbornik dogovorov Rossii s drugimi gosudarstvami (Collection of Russia’s treaties with other states). 1856–1917. M., Gos. izd-vo polit. literatury, 1952. URL: http://www.hist.msu.ru/ER/Etext/FOREIGN/china896.htm. (In Russ.)

10. Zhao Yonghua. Russkaya pressa v Kitae. 1898–1956 (The Russian press in China. 1898–1956). M.: Shans, 2017. (In Russ.)

11. 王芸生. 六十年来中国与日本. Lyushi nyan'laj chzhungo yuj zhiben' : (Wang Yunsheng. China and Japan over the past 60 years). 天津: 大公报馆. 1934年. (In Chin.)

12. 郭藴深: 试论中俄黑龙江地区的贸易. SHilun' chzhun"e hejlunczyan dicyuj de maoi : (Guo Yunshen. To discuss Sino-Russian Trade in the Heilongjiang area)). 龙江社会科学. 哈尔滨. 1990年. 第2期. 第49–54页. (In Chin.)

13. 郭藴深: 中东铁路与中俄经济贸易关系哈尔滨. CHzhundun telu yuj chzhun"e czinczi maoi guan'si ha erbin' : (Guo Yunshen. CER and the Sino-Russian trade and economic relations)). 北方文学. 哈尔滨. 1991年. 第2期. (In Chin.)

14. 郭藴深. 1840–1920年间的中俄关系. 1840–1920 nyan'czyan' de chzhun"e guan'si : (Guo Yunshen. Sino-Russian relations during the 1840–1920s period). 西伯利亚研究. 2003 年. 第4期. 第50–54页. (In Chin.)

15. 李济棠. 中俄密约和中东铁路的修筑. CHzhun"e miyue he chzhundun telu de syuchzhu : (Li Jitang. Sino-Russian secret treaty and the construction of the CER). 哈尔滨: 黑龙龙江人民出版社. 1989年. (In Chin.)

16. 刘存宽: 国际外交史上的大骗局 — 论光绪中俄密约. Goczi vajczyao shishan de dapyan'czyuj lun' guansyuj chzhun"e miyue : (Liu Сunkuan. The Biggest scam in the History of International Diplomacy — about the Sino-Russian secret treaty during the Guangxu (era). 社会科学战线. 1987年. 第2期. 第182页. (In Chin.)

17. 马蔚云. 中俄苏关系中的中东铁路问题: 中东铁路与黑龙江文化. CHzhun"e suguan'si chzhun de chzhundun telu ven'ti chzhundun telu yuj hejlunczyan ven'hua : (Ma Weiyun. The Problem of the CER in relations between China and Russia (USSR): the CER and the culture of Heilongjiang). 黑龙江与俄罗斯文化关系丛书. 黑龙江大学出版社. 2010年. (In Chin.)

18. 马蔚云. 国家利益变迁与苏俄在中东铁路问题上的变化. Goczya lii byan'cyan' yuj sue czaj chzhundun telu ven'ti shan de byan'hua : (Ma Weiyun. Changes of state interests and shifts in the position of the USSR on the issue of the CER).“俄罗斯, 东欧, 中亚历史与现实比较” 学术研讨会. 哈尔滨. 2014年. (In Chin.)

19. 马蔚云. 从中俄密约到中苏同盟 — 中东铁路六十年. Cunchzhun"e miyue dao chzhunsu tunmen chzhundun telu lyushi nyan' : (Ma Weiyun. From the Sino-Russian Secret Treaty to the Soviet-Chinese Alliance: 60 Years of the Sino-Eastern Railway). 北京: 社会科学文献出版社. 2016年. (In Chin.)

20. 苏生文, 赵爽: 中俄密约与李鸿章受贿之谜. CHzhun"e miyue yuj Li Hunchzhan shouhuej chzhi mi : (Su Shengwen, Zhao Shuang. The Sino-Russian Secret Treaty and the mystery of receiving a bribe by Li Hongzhang). 看历史. 2016年. 第8期. 第100–105页. URL: https://www.fx361.com/page/2016/1018/278616.shtml (accessed: 07.07.2023). (In Chin.)

21. 罗珍: 中国密约是不平等条约吗. CHzhungo miyue shibupinden tyaoyue ma : (Luo Zhen. Is the Sino-Russian Secret Treaty an unequal one? 北方路丛. 1997年. 第六期. 第85–89页. URL: https://www.ncpssd.org/Literature/articleinfo?id=1002471966&type=journalArticle&typename=%E4%B8%AD%E6%96%87%E6%9C%9F%E5%88%8A%E6%96%87%E7%AB%A0&nav=1&langType=1&pageUrl=https%253A%252F%252Fwww.ncpssd.org%252Fjournal%252Fdetails%253Fgch%253D82048X%2526years%253D1997%2526num%253D6%2526nav%253D1%2526langType%253D1 (accessed: 07.04.2023). (In Chin.)

22. 谭文凤: 中国密约是不平等条约吗. Li Hunchzhan cyan'din chzhun"e miyue chzhun de lyange ven'ti : (Tan Wenfeng. Two problems with the “Sino-Russian Secret Treaty” signed by Li Hongzhang). 历史档案. 1999年. 第4期. 第119–122页. (In Chin.)