Forgiveness and Self-Forgiveness: Moral and Psychological Unity

The main topic of the article is to demonstrate the relevance of the psychological approach to traditional ethical issues. The work considers its importance in relation to the plots of forgiveness and self-forgiveness, since the topic of self-forgiveness is generally impossible with classical rigoristic moralizing. In the article, “offended and offender” rather than “victim - offender” act as conceptual pairs, since offense is understood as the relationship between personal acquaintances within the framework of everyday life, and not as an extreme relationship “victim - executioner”. The act of forgiveness is considered as the ability to leave alone one's own negative emotions associated with an offense, which facilitates the state of the offended person, and does not always need to ask for forgiveness from the guilty party. However, forgiveness, according to the authors, does not imply an indispensable love for the forgiven offender. Forgiveness is akin to forgetting the harm done and disappointment in the Other. In the extreme, all forgiveness is unconditional, radical, a manifestation of personal generosity, although, as the article shows, not all authors agree with this. Generosity consists precisely in the ability to leave alone negative feelings of resentment even in relation to what seems unforgivable, in this case it acts as a voluntary gift. The concept of self-forgiveness is an essential psychological component of the ethical consideration of the "resentment-forgiveness" relationship today. Self-forgiveness is an important condition for establishing normal moral and psychological relationships. A person who does not accept, in Jungian language, his own Self, who denies himself as a fundamental imperfection, will project self-denial outside, onto others, and consider them to be guilty of his own suffering. Self-forgiveness and positive acceptance of oneself are necessary in order to be able to relate positively to the Other, especially since human grievances are often mutual. At the end of the article, the coverage of K. Tipping's concept of Radical Self-Forgiveness is given, demonstrating the interpenetration of ethical and psychological approaches to the topic of forgiveness.

Keywords

moral and psychological approach, resentment, forgiveness, retribution, unconditional forgiveness, gift, self-forgiveness, person, “Radical

Received

09.12.2020

Publication date

09.12.2020

Number of characters

34871

Cite

GOST	Zolotuhina-Abolina E., Makarenko M. Forgiveness and Self-Forgiveness: Moral and Psychological Unity // Chelovek – 2020. – V. 31. – Issue №5 C. 111-128 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://chelovek-journal.ru/S023620070012392-8-1 (circulation date: 16.09.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S023620070012392-8
MLA	Zolotuhina-Abolina, Elena, Makarenko, Maria "Forgiveness and Self-Forgiveness: Moral and Psychological Unity." Chelovek 31.5 (2020):111-128. DOI: 10.31857/S023620070012392-8
APA	Zolotuhina-Abolina E., Makarenko M. (2020). Forgiveness and Self-Forgiveness: Moral and Psychological Unity. Chelovek 31(5), pp.111-128 DOI: 10.31857/S023620070012392-8

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 1, views: 1107

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Anaschenkova I.V. Filosofiya kak put' vzrosleniya //Vestnik assotsiatsii vuzov turizma i servisa. 2017. № 4 (11). S. 140–141.

2. Artem'eva O.V. Ehta mnimaya ideya samoproscheniya //Chelovek. 2020. № 4.

3. Arkhipova M., Mikhajlova M. Proschenie: kak primirit'sya s soboj i s drugim. M.: Nikeya, 2018.

4. Bol'shunova N.Ya. Proschenie kak dukhovno-nravstvennoe yavlenie i psikhologicheskij fenomen //Chelovek i mir. 2017. № 1, t. 1. S. 201–218.

5. Guv'e T. Proschenie i neprostitel'noe // Ehticheskaya mysl'. 2004. № 5. S. 87–104.

6. Zhornyak E.S., Savel'eva N.E. Narrativnaya psikhoterapiya Ch.1. // Zhurnal prakticheskoj psikhologii i psikhoanaliza. 2005. № 4. [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://psyjournal.ru/articles/narrativnaya-psihoterapiya (data obrascheniya 13.07.2020).

7. Maslova A.V. Akt proscheniya kak vyzov i spasenie // Vestnik MGLU. Gumanitarnye nauki. 2018. № 4 (793). S. 289–297.

8. O dare. Diskussiya mezhdu Zh. Derrida i Zh.-L. Marionom / per. s fr. V.R. Rokityanskogo //Logos. 2011. № 3 (82). S. 144–171.

9. Popova L.O. Kachestvo dukha v zhizni cheloveka //Analitika kul'turologii. 2011. № 19.

10. Radionova A.A. Proschenie v strukture nravstvennoj potrebnosti lichnosti // Vestnik TGU. 2007. № 3 (47). S. 142–146.

11. Termos V. Proschenie kak polnota zhizni / per. s angl. A.K. Chernoglazova //Moskovskij psikhoterapevticheskij zhurnal. 2007. № 1. S. 119–130.

12. Tipping K. Radikal'noe proschenie. Dukhovnaya tekhnologiya dlya istseleniya vzaimootnoshenij, izbavleniya ot gneva i chuvstva viny, nakhozhdeniya vzaimoponimaniya v lyuboj situatsii /per. s angl. M.: Sofiya, 2020.

13. Tipping K. Radikal'noe samoproschenie. Pryamoj put' k podlinnomu prinyatiyu sebya /per. s angl. M.: OOO Knizhnoe iz-vo «Sofiya», 2020.

14. Troitskij K.E. Proschenie: ot dvukh ehticheskikh kontseptsij k dvum moral'nym perspektivam // Voprosy filosofii. 2020. № 2. S. 86–97.

15. Kholmgren M.R. Proschenie i vnutrennie tsennosti lichnosti // Sotsial'nye i gumanitarnye nauki. Otechestvennaya i zarubezhnaya literatura. 1995. № 3. S. 64–65.

16. Kh'yuz P. Proschenie. [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://philosophy.ru/ru/forgiveness/ (data obrascheniya 10.07.2020).

17. Frejd Z. Nedovol'stvo kul'turoj. [Ehlektronnyj resurs] URL: https://www.gumer.info/bibliotek_Buks/Psihol/Freid/ned_kult.php (data obrascheniya 13.07.2020).

18. Yankelevich V. Proschenie // Ironiya. Proschenie / per. s fr. i poslesl. V.V. Bol'shakova. M.: Respublika. 2004.