Foreign Direct Investment and Activities of Transnational Corporations of the PRC

 
PIIS013128120009752-8-1
DOI10.31857/S013128120009752-8
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Occupation: Professor, Director of the Institute of World Economy and International Relations, BSU
Affiliation: Baikal State University
Address: Russian Federation, Irkutsk
Occupation: Senior Lecturer, Department of Russian Language and Intercultural Communication
Affiliation: Baikal State University
Address: Russian Federation, Irkutsk
Journal nameProblemy Dalnego Vostoka
EditionIssue 2
Pages102-116
Abstract

Based on the analysis of the transnationality index, the nature of mergers and acquisitions of the largest Chinese companies, as well as the dynamics and geographical distribution of their outward direct investments, the paper concludes, that in case of taking into account some specific factors of institutional environment, J. Dunning's eclectic paradigm can be used as basic theoretical framework for the analysis of foreign investment activities of the largest Chinese corporations. In favor of an eclectic paradigm, the theory of “newborn firms,” the Uppsala internationalization model has been consistently rejected. In the final part, the paper describes the possible influence of the institutional environment on the export of foreign direct investments by Chinese companies.

KeywordsChina, foreign direct investments, outward investments, multinational companies, eclectic paradigm, institutional environment, institutional factor
Received20.05.2020
Publication date10.06.2020
Number of characters38031
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 5, views: 1146

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Buckley P J., Casson M. The future of the multinational enterprise // New York: The McMillan Company, 1976.

2. Child J., Rodrigues S.B. The Internationalization of Chinese Firms: A Case for Theoretical Extension? // Management and organization review. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005. T. 1. №. 3.

3. China M&A Market Update: Baird’s perspective on economic and MA activity // Robert W. Baird & Co. Wisconsin: 2019.

4. Dunning J. H. Explaining the international direct investment position of countries: towards a dynamic or developmental approach // International Capital Movements. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 1982.

5. Dunning J. H. The eclectic (OLI) paradigm of international production: past, present and future // International journal of the economics of business. Oxford: Carfax Publishing Ltd., 2001. T. 8. №. 2.

6. Dunning J. H. The eclectic paradigm of international production: some empirical tests // Journal of International Business Studies. London: Palgrave Macmillian, 1988. T. 19. №. 1.

7. Dunning J. H. Trade, location of economic activity and the MNE: A search for an eclectic approach // The international allocation of economic activity. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 1977.

8. Dunning J. H., Lundan S. M. Institutions and the OLI paradigm of the multinational enterprise // Asia Pacific Journal of Management. New Delhi: Sage Publications, 2008. T. 25. №. 4.

9. Johanson J., Vahlne J.E. The internationalization process of the firm—a model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments // Journal of international business studies. London: Palgrave Macmillian, 1977. T. 8. №. 1.

10. Johanson J., Wiedersheim‐Paul F. The internationalization of the firm—four swedish cases // Journal of management studies. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwel, 1975. T. 12. №. 3.

11. Mathews J. A. Dragon multinationals: New players in 21 st century globalization // Asia Pacific journal of management. New Delhi: Sage Publications, 2006. T. 23. №. 1.

12. North D. C. Institutions // Journal of economic perspectives. Nashville: American Economic Asssociation, 1991. T. 5. №. 1.

13. Oviatt B.M., McDougall P.P. Toward a theory of international new ventures // Journal of international business studies. London: Palgrave Macmillian, 1994. T. 25. №. 1.

14. Peng M.W. Institutional transitions and strategic choices // Academy of management review. NY: Academy of Management, 2003. T. 28. №. 2.

15. The global economy (Business and economic data for 200 countries). URL:https://ru.theglobaleconomy.com/

16. The global economy (Business and economic data for 200 countries). URL:https://ru.theglobaleconomy.com/

17. Voss H. The foreign direct investment behaviour of Chinese firms: does the'new institutional theory'approach offer explanatory power?: doctoral dissertation. Leeds: University of Leeds, 2007.

18. World investment report // UNCTAD. Geneva, 2018.

19. Balashova M.A. Ob ehvolyutsii konkurentsii na makrourovne ehkonomiki i osobennostyakh sovremennoj mezhstranovoj konkurentnoj bor'by // Izvestiya Bajkal'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Irkutsk, 2013. №. 3.

20. Lepa T.P. Retrospektiva i perspektiva razvitiya torgovo-tamozhennykh otnoshenij mezhdu Rossiej i Kitaem // Izvestiya Irkutskoj gosudarstvennoj ehkonomicheskoj akademii. Irkutsk — 2018. T. 28. № 2. S.

21. Meteleva E.R. Strategicheskoe upravlenie razvitiem ehkonomicheskikh sistem v usloviyakh globalizatsii /E.R. Meteleva // Izvestiya Irkutskoj gosudarstvennoj ehkonomicheskoj akademii. Irkutsk — 2016. T. 26. № 3.

22. Chzhungo dujvaj chzhitszetoutszy tuntszi gunbao: (Statisticheskij doklad o sostoyanii zarubezhnykh investitsij Kitaya). Pekin, 2018

23. Shalak A.V. Kitajskaya mechta cherez kontseptsiyu «myagkoj sily» // Izvestiya Irkutskoj gosudarstvennoj ehkonomicheskoj akademii. Irkutsk — 2015. T. 25. № 3. S. 564‒568.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up