All
 
|
 
 


Correlation between the Categories of «Sovereignty» and «Human Rights»: Beijing’s Posi-tion
 
PIIS013128120006098-8-1
DOI10.31857/S013128120006098-8
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Svetlana Krivokhizh 
Affiliation: National Research University "Higher School of Economics"
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Journal nameProblemy Dalnego Vostoka
EditionIssue 4
Pages77-84
Abstract

The article examines how the concepts of "sovereignty" and "human rights" are correlated, according to Chinese researchers and politicians, what factors influenced the fact that the principle of "sovereignty" is more important in China than "human rights" and what changes this principle is undergoing at present. The author comes to the conclusion that with increasing involvement in international political and economic processes, it is more difficult for China to strictly adhere to the principle of non-interference in the affairs of other States and the rule of sovereignty. China’s approach becomes more pragmatic and flexible.

Keywordssovereignty, human rights, China's foreign policy, "duty to protect"
AcknowledgmentThis article was prepared based on the results of study No. 18 - IP - 01, supported by the Higher School of Economics - St. Petersburg
Received23.09.2019
Publication date23.09.2019
Number of characters30551
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 2, views: 1068

Readers community rating: votes 0 

1. . Spence J. The Search for Modern China. New York W.W. Norton and Company, 1990. P. 201.
2. . Masini F. The Formation of Modern Chinese Lexicon and its Evolution toward a National Language: The Period from 1840 to 1898 // Journal of Chinese Linguistics Monograph Series. 1993. No. 6. P. 47.
3. . Kim S., Sovereignty in the Chinese Image of World Order in R. St. J. Macdonald (ed.), Essays in Hon-or of Wang Tieya. UK: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 1993. P. 425-445.
4. . Xi's speech at 'Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence' anniversary, China.org.cn, July 7, 2014. URL: http://www.china.org.cn/  world / 2014–07 / 07 / content_32876905.htm (date appeals: 03/10/2019).
5. . Written Statement of the People's Republic of China to the International Court of Justice on the Issue of Kosovo, The Hague, April 16 2009. URL: https://www.icj-cij.org/  files / case-related / 141/15611 .pdf (accessed March 10, 2019).
6. . Overview of Security Council Meeting Records S / PV.5619, January 2017.
7. URL: https://www.securitycouncilreport.org/atf/cf/%  7B65BFCF9B-6D27-4E9C-8CD3-CF6E4FF96FF9% 7D / Myan% 20SPV% 205619.pdf (accessed March 10, 2019).
8. . Progress in China’s Human Rights in 2012, May 2013, Beijing. URL: http://english.gov.cn/  archive / white_paper / 2014/08/23 / content_281474982986492.htm (accessed March 10, 2019).
9. . Timofeev O.A. The evolution of the concept of state sovereignty in China // Problematic analysis and state-management design. M., 2012. V. 5. No. 2. P. 114–120.
10. . Wu Zendong. Zhuquan globes shueisho chutan: [A preliminary study of Hobbes's sovereignty theory] // Tianjin shehui kesue. No. 5. 2007. S. 17–23. DOI: 10.16240 / j.cnki.1002–3976.2007.05.005.
11. . Lee Ting. Loke Zhuquan Zhengzhiguande Quiyuan Ji Guishu Kaobyan: [Study of the origins and membership of Locke’s political views on sovereignty]. Nantong dashue shuebao. No. 5. 2015. S. 33–38.
12. . Sa Baiyin, Dan Zhenglai. Bodan Lun Zhuquan: [Boden on Sovereignty] // Hebei Fasyue. No. 9. 2008. S. 54–59. DOI: 10.16494 / j.cnki.1002–3933.2008.09.001.
13. . Zhang Tao, Liu Junjie. Jiyui Ren Zhuquande Makesi Enges Minzhusyusyan Jiqi Xianshi II: [Democratic views of Marx and Engels on popular sovereignty and their practical importance] // Lilun Yu gaige. No. 1. 2015. S. 27-30. DOI: 10.13553 / j.cnki.llygg.2015.01.007.
14. . Wang Juan. Dandai Xifang Guanyu Zhuquan Shifou Guoshide Zhenlun Pinjie: [Review of Western discussions on whether the concept of sovereignty is obsolete] // Shijie Jinji Yu Zhengzhi Luntan. No. 5. 2003. S. 57-60.
15. . Zhao Yang. Guojia Zhuquan Yu Goji Ganshe - Yizhong Iguifan Wei Jichude Jedu: [State Sovereignty and International Intervention - Normative Interpretation] // Jiao Yue Yu Yanju. No. 2. 2017.S. 108.
16. . Wu Xianghong, Huang Indus. Shijie Biangezhund Zhuquan Yu Guojia Li: [Sovereignty and National Interests in a Changing World] // Zhongguo Zhuankesue. No. 6. 1998.P. 76.
17. . Lee Bojun. Quanqui zhili: zhongguo bu ganshe zhenge yu gozzifa: [Global governance: Chinese policy of non-interference and international law] // Taiping Xuebao. No. 9. 2014. S. 1–11. DOI: 10.14015 / j.cnki.1004–8049.2014.09.09.013.
18. . Svensson M. Debating Human rights in China: A Conceptual and Political History, Rowman & Little-field Publishers. 2002.P. 43.
19. . Yonghong Yang. Sovereignty in China's Perspective. Peter Lang GmbH, Internationaler Verlag der Wis-senschaften. 2017.P. 131.
20. . Comission on Human Rights Forty-sixth session Summary Record of the 40th Meeting. February 26, 1990. URL: https://undocs.org/  E / CN.4 / 1990 / SR.40. P. 19 (date of treatment: 03/10/2019).
21. . Human Rights in China. Information Office of the State Council of the People's Republic of China. No-vember 1991, Beijing. URL: http://www.china.org.cn/  e-white / 7 / index.htm (accessed: 03/10/2019).
22. . Sun P. Human Rights Protection System in China. Berlin 2014.P. 93.
23. . Sceats S., Breslin S. China and the International Human Rights System. Chatham House. October 2012. URL: https://www.chathamhouse.org/  sites / default / files / public / Research / International% 20Law / r1012_sceatsbreslin.pdf (accessed: 03/10/2019).
24. . Fung C. China and the Responsibility to Protect: From Opposition to Advocacy. United States Institute of Peace. June 8, 2016. URL: https://www.usip.org/  publications / 2016/06 / china-and-responsibility-protect-opposition-advocacy (accessed: 03/10/2019).
25. . Chen Qiujin. Qizhi Xianming Jianchi Macesichzhuy Renquinguan: [Firmly adhere to the Marxist views on human rights] // Mao Zedong ssyan yanju. No. 3. 1994.S. 91.
26. . Cheng Zhishan. Makeside zhenquyuanguang zai zhungguo: [A Marxist view of human rights in China] // Beijing dasue xuebao. No. 6. 2012. S. 5–15.
27. . Wang Guishu. Deng Xiaoping guanyu renquan wentide jige zhunyao ssyan: [Some important ideas of Deng Xiaoping on the issue of human rights] // Nankai syuebao. No. 6. 1997. S. 24–27.
28. . See, for example: Liu Wenzong. Lun gozzifazhunde zhuquan yu renquan - bo “Renquan gaoyu zhuquan” mulun: [Sovereignty and human rights in international law - criticism of the concept of “human rights above sovereignty”] // Weijiao xueyuan shuebao. No. 3. 1999. S. 38; Liu Jie. Lun renjuan gojihua yu goji jendaozhuy ganyu: [On the internationalization of human rights and international humanitarian intervention] // Sueshu yuekan. No. 12. 1999.P. 21.
29. . Luo Yanhua. “Baohude zhezhen” de fakzhan lichen yu zhongode lichan: [Development of the concept of “duty to protect” and the position of China] // Goji zhengzhi yanju. No. 3. 2014.S. 11–25.
30. . And Xiaoming, Jia Yingjian. Toushi Zhuquan Yu Renquan Guanside Sanchong Shijiao: [Three Views on the Relationship of Sovereignty and Human Rights] // Tsilu Shuekan. No. 3. 2014. S. 83–88.
31. . Zhang Yunlong. “Yunyu jujo quanli ji quanli” kei kenen - lun aluntede jenquan lilun: [How is it possible to “have the right to have many rights” - about H. Arendt’s theory of human rights] // Xuehai. No. 4. 2017. S. 77–83. DOI: 10.16091 / j.cnki.cn32-1308 / c.2017.04.011.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up