Introducing digitalization in forensic and economic expertise

The purpose of the study is to identify factors that affect the quality of forensic economic examination and to consider the ways to neutralize those using digital technologies. The subject of the study is the application of digital technologies to the work of an expert economist. The research methods were the analysis of scientific literature and judicial practice of Russian and foreign researchers, analysis of websites of expert institutions, comparison of expert activities, data aggregation, classification of types and methods of forensic economic examination, description of the expert's activities. The article presents the types and objects of forensic economic examinations in accordance with current regulatory legal acts.

The developments in forensic economic examinations are considered. The potential for introducing modern end-to-end digital technologies into the work of expert economists is analyzed and seven components of technological progress in the field identified. The factors influencing the quality of the forensic economic examination are identified. The measures to minimize and neutralize the threats to expert activity in the context of digitalization are proposed.

Keywords

forensic economic expertise, expert, economic security, digitalization

Publication date

20.09.2022

Number of characters

21690

Cite

GOST	Belyaeva A., Elena P. Introducing digitalization in forensic and economic expertise // Obshchestvo i ekonomika – 2022. – Issue 9 C. 115-128 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://oie.jes.su/S020736760021867-2-1 (circulation date: 28.04.2025). DOI: 10.31857/S020736760021867-2
MLA	Belyaeva, Arina, Elena, Pecheritsa "Introducing digitalization in forensic and economic expertise." Obshchestvo i ekonomika 9 (2022):115-128. DOI: 10.31857/S020736760021867-2
APA	Belyaeva A., Elena P. (2022). Introducing digitalization in forensic and economic expertise. Obshchestvo i ekonomika (9), pp.115-128 DOI: 10.31857/S020736760021867-2

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 1, views: 664

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Ukaz Prezidenta Rossijskoj Federatsii ot 09.05.2017 goda №203 «O Strategii razvitiya informatsionnogo obschestva v Rossijskoj Federatsii na 2017-2030 gody» URL: http://www.kremlin.ru/acts/bank/41919

2. Prikaz Minyusta Rossii ot 27.12.2012 №37 (red. ot 28.12.2021) «Ob utverzhdenii Perechnya rodov (vidov) sudebnykh ehkspertiz, vypolnyaemykh v federal'nykh byudzhetnykh sudebno-ehkspertnykh uchrezhdeniyakh Minyusta Rossii, i Perechnya ehkspertnykh spetsial'nostej, po kotorym predstavlyaetsya pravo samostoyatel'nogo proizvodstva sudebnykh ehkspertiz v federal'nykh byudzhetnykh sudebno-ehkspertnykh uchrezhdeniyakh Minyusta Rossii» (Zaregistrirovano v Minyuste Rossii 29.01.2013 №26742) URL: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_141682/

3. Prikaz MVD Rossii ot 29.06.2005 №511 (red. ot 27.06.2019) «Voprosy organizatsii proizvodstva sudebnykh ehkspertiz v ehkspertno-kriminalisticheskikh podrazdeleniyakh organov vnutrennikh del Rossijskoj Federatsii» (vmeste s «Instruktsiej po organizatsii proizvodstva sudebnykh ehkspertiz v ehkspertno-kriminalisticheskikh podrazdeleniyakh organov vnutrennikh del Rossijskoj Federatsii», «Perechnem rodov (vidov) sudebnykh ehkspertiz, proizvodimykh v ehkspertno-kriminalisticheskikh podrazdeleniyakh organov vnutrennikh del Rossijskoj Federatsii») (Zaregistrirovano v Minyuste Rossii 23.08.2005 №6931) URL: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_55315/

4. Prikaz SK Rossii ot 24.07.2020 №77 «Ob utverzhdenii Poryadka opredeleniya, peresmotra urovnya kvalifikatsii i attestatsii ehkspertov federal'nogo gosudarstvennogo kazennogo uchrezhdeniya «Sudebno-ehkspertnyj tsentr Sledstvennogo komiteta Rossijskoj Federatsii» na pravo samostoyatel'nogo proizvodstva sudebnykh ehkspertiz» (Zaregistrirovano v Minyuste Rossii 11.08.2020 №59230) URL: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_359829/

5. Bykova A.S. Sravnitel'nyj analiz komissionnoj i kompleksnoj ehkspertizy [Ehlektronnyj resurs]/ Studencheskie nauchnye dostizheniya. 2021. S. 149-151. URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_45717065_72875802.pdf

6. Cherdantsev A.Yu. Tsifrovye sledy kak kriminalisticheskij fenomen [Ehlektronnyj resurs]/ Vestnik akademii sledstvennogo komiteta Rossijskoj Federatsii. 2019. №4 (22). S. 178-180. URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_42769398_43131692.pdf

7. Solovey Yu.A. Modern technologies of digital economy as a catalyst for economic growth of regional markets of the Russian Federation / Yu. A. Solovey, E. N. Kamyshanchenko, M. A. Mkhitaryan // Research result. Economic research. 2019. №4. S. 3-12. URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_41596322_73591287.pdf

8. Scherbinina A.G. Rol' sudebnoj ehkonomicheskoj ehkspertizy v preduprezhdenii ehkonomicheskikh prestuplenij / A. G. Scherbinina, M. M. Feodorov // Modern Science. 2020. № 5-3. S. 188-192. EDN TBSGCZ. URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=42911926

9. Plotnikov N.V. Sovremennyj vzglyad na teoriyu sudebnoj ehkspertizy s pozitsii tsifrovoj ehkonomiki / N.V. Plotnikov, A.V. Grun'kovskij, E.V. Pecheritsa // Zdorov'e – osnova chelovecheskogo potentsiala: problemy i puti ikh resheniya. 2021. T. 16. № 4. S. 1615-1622. EDN SMAXLC. URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=47850262

10. Tsifrovaya ehkonomika 2024. URL: https://digital.ac.gov.ru

11. Kulidzhanov K.B. Instrumenty i sistemy dlya obrabotki i analiza informatsii dannykh v sistemakh Big data // Komp'yuternye nauki i telekommunikatsii. 2021. № 1(59). S. 12-19. EDN GCGELG URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=45788226

12. Frolova A.V. Tsifrovye dvojniki v vysokotekhnologichnom proizvodstve: novye instrumenty tsifrovoj ehkonomiki / A. V. Frolova, L. E. Kopylova // Uspekhi v khimii i khimicheskoj tekhnologii. 2020. T. 34. № 1(224). S. 32-33. EDN EGTHBP. URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=42671550

13. Sudip Phuyal, Diwakar Bista, Rabindra Bista, Challenges, Opportunities and Future Directions of Smart Manufacturing: A State of Art Review, Sustainable Futures, Volume 2, 2020, 100023, ISSN 2666-1888. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2020.100023

14. Rehman A. and Hashim F. (2021), Can forensic accounting impact sustainable corporate governance? Corporate Governance, Vol. 21 No. 1, pp. 212-227. https://doi-org.ezproxy.unecon.ru/10.1108/CG-06-2020-0269

15. Kumari Tiwari R. and Debnath J. (2017), Forensic accounting: a blend of knowledge, Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, Vol. 25 No. 1, pp. 73-85. https://doi-org.ezproxy.unecon.ru/10.1108/JFRC-05-2016-0043

16. Alshurafat H., Al Shbail M.O. and Mansour E. (2021), Strengths and weaknesses of forensic accounting: an implication on the socio-economic development, Journal of Business and Socio-economic Development, Vol. 1 No. 2, pp. 135-148. https://doi-org.ezproxy.unecon.ru/10.1108/JBSED-03-2021-0026

17. Gadzhiev N.G., Kiseleva O.V., Konovalenko S.A., Skripkina O.V., Akhmedova Kh.G. Razvitie klassifikatsii sudebnykh ehkonomicheskikh ehkspertiz // Vestnik Altajskoj akademii ehkonomiki i prava. 2020. № 2. S. 109-114. URL: https://vaael.ru/ru/article/view?id=1006

18. Timchenko V.A. Klassifikatsiya sudebnykh ehkonomicheskikh ehkspertiz v sovremennykh usloviyakh // Voprosy ehkspertnoj praktiki. 2019. № S1. S. 643-646. URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=39657949

19. Savitskij A. Aktual'nye problemy sudebnoj ehkonomicheskoj ehkspertizy. URL: https://www.expertsud.ru/content/view/235/36/

20. Firsov V.V. Problemy klassifikatsii i mesto sudebnoj nalogovoj ehkspertizy v ugolovnom protsesse. Upravlencheskoe konsul'tirovanie. 2018;(3):8-13. https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2018-3-8-13