On the present-day state of economics from the standpoint of epistemological realism

 
PIIS020736760014934-6-1
DOI10.31857/S020736760014934-6
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Occupation: professor
Affiliation: Pskov branch of the Academy of Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia
Address: Russian Federation, Pskov
Journal nameObshchestvo i ekonomika
EditionIssue 5
Pages5-19
Abstract

The author maintains that the oppositions between normative and positive theories, as well as deductive-axiomatic and concrete-historical methods, are mostly scholastic. In the article the thesis is substantiated that the “empirical turn” in economics is, in essence, a regression to the methodology of positivism of the late 19th - early 20th centuries.

Keywordseconomics, methodology, normative theory, paradigm, positive theory, principle
Received20.05.2021
Publication date24.05.2021
Number of characters37243
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 539

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Platon. Kratil / Platon. Sobr. soch. v 4-kh t. // M.: Mysl'. 1990. T. 1. C. 613-681.

2. Petrov Yu.A., Zakharov A.A. Metodologicheskie printsipy teorij // Ozersk: OTI MIFI. 2000. 28 s.

3. Puankare A. O nauke // M. : Nauka. 1983. 736 s.

4. Nikiforov A.L. Ponyatie istiny v teorii poznaniya // Ehpistemologiya i filosofiya nauki. 2008. T. 16. № 2. S. 50-65.

5. Blaug M. Metodologiya ehkonomicheskoj pauki, ili Kak ehkonomisty ob'yasnyayut // M.: NP "Zhurnal Voprosy ehkonomiki". 2004. 416 s.

6. Rassel B. Filosofiya logicheskogo atomizma / Rassel B. Izbrannye trudy // Novosibirsk: Sib. univ. izd-vo. 2007. C. 121-221.

7. Vitgenshtejn L. Tractatus logico-philosophicus / Vitgenshtejn L. Izbrannye raboty // M.: «Territoriya buduschego». 2005. C. 14-228.

8. Popper K. Unended Quest // London: Routledge. 1992. 315 p.

9. Popper K. Logika nauchnogo issledovaniya / Popper K. Logika i rost nauchnogo znaniya // M.: Progress. 1983. C. 33-235.

10. Khehnds U. Normativnaya teoriya ratsional'nogo vybora: proshloe, nastoyaschee i buduschee // Voprosy ehkonomiki. 2012. № 10. S. 52-75.

11. Stepin V.S. Teoreticheskoe znanie // M.: Progress-Traditsiya. 2000. 744 s.

12. Popper K. Otkrytoe obschestvo i ego vragi // M. : Feniks. 1992. T. 2. 528 s.

13. Gusserl' Eh. Filosofiya kak strogaya nauka // Novocherkassk: SAGUNA. 1994. 354 s.

14. Egorov D.G., Egorova A.V. O edinstve ehkonomicheskoj teorii // SPb.: Izdatel'sko-poligraficheskaya assotsiatsiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedenij. 2019. 214 s.

15. Arrow K.J., Debreu G. Existence of Equilibrium for a Competitive Economy // Econometrica. 1954. V. 22. P. 265-290.

16. Efimov V.M. Ehkonomicheskaya nauka pod voprosom: inye metodologiya, istoriya i issledovatel'skie praktiki // M.: KURS: INFRA-M. 2016. 352 s.

17. Egorov D.G. Neoklassika VS klassika: est' li v ehkonomicheskoj teorii tretij put'? // Mirovaya ehkonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. 2016. № 6. C. 35-41.

18. Coase R. The Nature of the Firm // Economica. 1937. N 5. P. 386–405.

19. Coase R. The Problem of Social Cost // Journal of Law and Economics. 1960. N 3. P. 1-44.

20. Balatskij E.V. O virtualizatsii ehkonomicheskoj nauki // Naukovedenie, №1(17). 2003. C. 154–167.

21. Rodrik D. Economic Rules: The Rights and Wrongs of the Dismal Science // New York: W.W. Norton & Company. 2015. 272 p.

22. Koshovets O.B. «Gorizontal'nyj progress» ehkonomicheskoj nauki: mezhdu konstruiruemoj real'nost'yu i tekhnonaukoj: Nauchnyj doklad // M.: Institut ehkonomiki RAN. 2019. 47 s.

23. Kapelyushnikov R.I. O sovremennom sostoyanii ehkonomicheskoj nauki: polusotsiologicheskie nablyudeniya / Kuda dvizhetsya sovremennaya ehkonomicheskaya nauka? // M.: Institut ehkonomiki RAN. 2018. S. 8–33.

24. Kuhn T.S. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions // Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 1962. 264 p.

25. Levi-Stros K. Pervobytnoe myshlenie // M.: Respublika. 1994. 384 s.

26. Fejerabend P. Izbrannye trudy po metodologii nauki // M.: Progress, 1997. 467 c.

27. Khehnds D.U. Popper i Lakatos v ehkonomicheskoj metodologii / Filosofiya ehkonomiki. Antologiya / pod red. D. Khausmana // M.: izd. Instituta Gajdara. 2012. C. 227-246.

28. Dyugem P. Fizicheskaya teoriya: eyo tsel' i stroenie // M.: KomKniga. 2007. 328 s.

29. Anan'in O.I. Struktura ehkonomiko-teoreticheskogo znaniya. Metodologicheskij analiz // M.: Nauka. 2005. 244 s.

30. Egorov D.G. Chto takoe nauka i pochemu my ej doveryaem? // Filosofiya khozyajstva. 2013. № 6. C. 143-154.

31. Boldyrev I.A. Ehkonomicheskaya metodologiya cegodnya: kratkij obzor osnovnykh napravlenij // Zhurnal Novoj ehkonomicheskoj assotsiatsii. 2011. № 9. C. 47-70.

32. Makkloski D. Ritorika ehkonomicheskoj nauki // M.; SPb : Izd-vo Instituta Gajdara; Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. 2015. 328 s.

33. Koshovets O.B., Frolov I.Eh. Nauka v opasnosti ili (tekhno)nauka stanovitsya opasnoj? // Ehpistemologiya i filosofiya nauki 2020. T. 57. № 1. S. 51–58.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up