Administrative and market methods of environmental regulation in the USA through the prism of federalism

Occupation: Leading researcher
Affiliation: Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations (IMEMO), Russian Academy of Science
Address: Profsoyuznaya Str., 23, Moscow, 117997, Russian Federation

Journal name

Obshchestvo i ekonomika

Edition

Issue 3

Pages

93-110

Abstract

The author analyses the main problems of environmental protection in the United States, the tools for their solution, and the assessment of their effectiveness, taking into account the federal structure of the United States.

Keywords

environmental protection, air quality, environmental expertise, environmental standards, market methods of environmental regulation, the institution of citizens' claims

Received

24.03.2021

Publication date

25.03.2021

Number of characters

42395

Cite

GOST	Shlihter A. Administrative and market methods of environmental regulation in the USA through the prism of federalism // Obshchestvo i ekonomika – 2021. – Issue 3 C. 93-110 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://oie.jes.su/S020736760014262-7-1 (circulation date: 26.04.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S020736760014262-7
MLA	Shlihter, Alexey A "Administrative and market methods of environmental regulation in the USA through the prism of federalism." Obshchestvo i ekonomika 3 (2021):93-110. DOI: 10.31857/S020736760014262-7
APA	Shlihter A. (2021). Administrative and market methods of environmental regulation in the USA through the prism of federalism. Obshchestvo i ekonomika (3), pp.93-110 DOI: 10.31857/S020736760014262-7

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 509

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. BP Statistical Review of World Energy.67th edition. BP. June 2018. R. 2. https://www.bp.com/content/dam/bp/en/corporate/pdf/ (accessed 05.05.2019)

2. After years of improvement, US air quality has gotten worse since 2016, By Joshua Bote. USA TODAY, November 3. 2019. R. 2. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2019/11/01/us-air-quality-worse-since-2016-after-years-improvements-report/2499356001/https://www.bp.com/content/dam/bp/en/corporate/pdf/ (accessed 05.05.2020)

3. Thompson Jr. V. Environmental Law and Policy // Foundation Press, 2003. P. 36-39; Agyeman J. Sustainable Communities and the Challenge of Environmental Justice // New York University Press, 2005. P. 25-26. Cm. takzhe: Geiser K., Waneck G. PCBs and Warren County. In Billard R. (ed). Unequal Protection: Environmental Justice in Communities of Color. San Francisco: Sierra Club Books. P. 52. (accessed 03.06.2018)

4. Environmental Conservation Law. 3-0101. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation 1970. R. 2; N'yu-Jorkskij Zakon Ob Okhrane Okruzhayuschej Sredy, Razdel 3-0101. https://newyork.public.law (accessed 02.07.2017)

5. Salifornia Legislative Information. Standart SB Bill Text 2018. R. 1-3. California Renewables Portfolia Sandart.http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=201720180SB1 (accessed 03.05.2019)

6. Lan'shina T. Korporativnaya ehnergeticheskaya revolyutsiya. Kak korporatsii perekhodyat na vozobnovlyaemuyu ehnergetiku // Ehkologiya i pravo. Mart 2019, № 74. S. 13. https://yandex.ru/search/?text=Lan'shina%20T.%20Korporativnaya%20ehnergeticheskaya%20revolyutsiya202019%2C%20№%2074&clid=2270455&win=380&&lr=213 (accessed 04.010.2020)

7. Bast Elizabeth, Doukas Alex, Pickard Sam. Overseas Development Institute & Oil Change International, «Empty promises: G20 subsidies to oil, gas and coal production», 16 November, 2015. R. 4. https://www.odi.org/publications/10058-empty-promises-g20-subsidies-oil-gas-and-coal-production (accessed 04.010.2020)

8. Shlikhter A. Parizhskaya konferentsiya po klimatu i ehnergeticheskie prioritety Donal'da Trampa. Mirovaya ehkonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 2018, tom 62, № 12. S. 68.https://arxiv.gaugn.ru/s013122270003697-7-1/ (accessed 09.010.2020)

9. IER. Institute for Energy Research. The Status of Renewable Electricity Mandates in the states.Wash., D.C., 2015. R.1-2. www.instituteforenergyresearch.org/state (accessed 02.010.2018)

10. Broslavskij L.I. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' za ehkologicheskie prestupleniya v oblasti okhrany vod v SShA. Iz opyta zarubezhnykh stran // Zhurnal rossijskogo prava. № 3, 2008. S. 124-125. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/ugolovnaya-otvetstvennost-za-ekologicheskie-prestupleniya-v-oblasti-ohrany-vod-v-ssha/viewer (accessed 02.010.2020)

11. FY2019 EPA Budget in Brief. Febriary 2018, p.1. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2018-02/documents/fy-2019-epa-bib.pdf (accessed 01.09.2019)

12. Shlikhter A. «Zelenaya» strategiya amerikanskikh korporatsij // Mirovaya ehkonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. Iyul' 2013, № 7. S. 18. https//yandex.ru//search/ (accessed 08.010.2020)

13. USAEPA. The Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act(SARA), Wash.,D.C.,2019,p.1-3 https://www.epa.gov/superfund/superfund-amendments-and-reauthorization-act-sara (accessed 03.07.2020)

14. Emergency_Planning_and_Community_Right-to-Know_Act.Wash., D.C., 1986. R. 2 _(Sections_311%E2%80%93312,_42_U.S.C._%C2%A7%C2%A7_11021-11022) https://ru.qaz.wiki/wiki/ (accessed 08.05.2017)

15. Broslavskij L.I. Otvetstvennost' za ehkologicheskie prestupleniya // “Zakonnost'”. № 10, 2007. S. 1 https://center-bereg.ru/o4637.html (accessed 08.05.2018)

16. The Amendments to EPCRA. Section 304 and 312 –America’s Water Infrastructure Act(Section 2018 https://www.epa.gov/ (accessed 08.09.2019)