Price publication: 0
Number of purchasers: 0, views: 402
Readers community rating: votes 0
1. Lutsenko S.I. Povyshenie kachestva korporativnogo upravleniya cherez mekhanizm vnutrennikh korporativnykh standartov // Obschestvo i ehkonomika. 2016, № 11. C. 32Ts40.
2. Alchian A., Demsetz H. Production, Information Costs, and Economic Organization // American Economic Review. 1972, vol. 62, pp. 777Ts795.
3. Bainbridge S. In Defense of the Shareholder Wealth Maximization Norm: A Reply to Professor Green // Washington and Lee Law Review. 1993, vol. 50, pp. 1423Ts1447.
4. Deakin S. The Corporation as Commons: Rethinking Property Rights, Governance and Sustainability in the Business Enterprise // QueenTs Law Journal, vol. 37, pp. 339Ts381.
5. Easterbrook F., Fischel D. The Corporate Contract // Columbia Law Review. 1989, vol. 89, pp. 1416Ts1448.
6. Bebchuk L. The Case for Increasing Shareholder Power // Harvard Law Review. 2005, vol. 118, pp. 833Ts914.
7. Blair M., Stout L. A Team Production Theory of Corporate Law // Virginia Law Review. 1999, vol. 85, pp. 247Ts328.
8. Fama E., Jensen M. Separation of Ownership and Control // Journal of Law and Economics. 1983, vol. 26, pp. 301Ts325.
9. Hansmann H., Kraakman R. The End of History for Corporate Law // Working paper. Harvard Law School Cambridge. 2000, pp. 1Ts34.
10. Jensen M., Meckling W. Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure // Journal of Financial Economics. 1976, vol. 3, pp. 305Ts360.
11. Jensen M. Value Maximization, Stakeholder Theory, and the Corporate Objective Function // Business Ethics Quarterly. 2002, vol. 12, pp. 235Ts256.
12. Kahan M., Rock E. The Insignificance of Proxy Access // Virginia Law Review. 2011, vol. 97, pp. 1347Ts1434.
13. Moore M. A Necessary Social Evil: The Indispensability of the Shareholder Value Corporation // University of Cambridge Working paper. 2016, pp. 1Ts41.
14. Stout L. The Mythical Benefits of Shareholder Control // Virginia Law Review. 2007, vol. 93, pp. 789Ts809.
15. Stout L. The Corporation as Time Machine: Intergenerational Equity, Intergenerational Efficiency, and the Corporate Form // Seattle University Law Review. 2015, vol. 38, pp. 685Ts723.