On the Moral Reform Movement in the Early Modern Society: Ideological Grounds and Institutions

The formation of early modern states and individuals was followed by the moral reform movement aimed at changing of moral consciousness and human behavior. All three actors involved in it – state, Church, and local communities – appealed to quite different grounds as an explanation for their disciplining efforts: ideas of Neo-stoicism; pessimistic anthropology or man’s irresistible inclination to evil and sinfulness; “theology of retribution” which says, that sins are not simply private and personal failings, they affected the entire congregation as well, causing God’s wages. A feeling of disturbance of the life’s usual order was also shared by all three actors and was a consequence of religious wars, large-scale epidemics, demographic pressure on the early modern society, etc. The moral reform tools were quite numerous: a “police” as a system of regulations to impose public and moral order, and houses of corrections (state); the auricular confession (Catholics) replaced by the public confession of sins by the Protestants; Calvinist consistories and Lutheran marriage courts. Both the Catholic and Protestant Churches practiced different forms of social exclusion. Local communities as well were active in the horizontal disciplining of the society (societies for the reformation of manners in puritan England; “fraternal correction” (Mt 18,15–18) in rural communities, etc.). New morals were communicated through a massive pedagogization of society, different educational institutions and school theater, various book publications. Moral reform movement goes far beyond the chronological framework of the early modern period and its effect in public and private sphere war quite different. But by the end of the eighteenth century the new morals and standards of behavior were accepted by the Christians as normative, even though they did not actually live up to them on every point.

Keywords

Early modern times, reformation of morals, social control, discipline

Received

17.07.2019

Publication date

30.07.2019

Number of characters

34249

Cite

GOST	Korzo M. On the Moral Reform Movement in the Early Modern Society: Ideological Grounds and Institutions // Chelovek – 2019. – V. 30. – Issue №4 C. 72-93 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://chelovek-journal.ru/S023620070005911-9-1 (circulation date: 26.04.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S023620070005911-9
MLA	Korzo, Margarita A "On the Moral Reform Movement in the Early Modern Society: Ideological Grounds and Institutions." Chelovek 30.4 (2019):72-93. DOI: 10.31857/S023620070005911-9
APA	Korzo M. (2019). On the Moral Reform Movement in the Early Modern Society: Ideological Grounds and Institutions. Chelovek 30(4), pp.72-93 DOI: 10.31857/S023620070005911-9

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 2, views: 1496

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Weber M. Protestantskaya ehtika i dukh kapitalizma [The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism], transl. from German by M.I. Levina. Weber M. Izbrannye proizvedeniya [Collected Works]. Moscow: Progress Publ., 1990.

2. Kildushov O. Politsiya kak nauka i politika: o rozhdenii sovremennogo poryadka iz filosofii i politseiskoi praktiki [Police as Science and Politics: On the Birth of Contemporary Order from Philosophy and Political Practice]. Sotsiologicheskoe obozrenie. 2013. Vol. 12. N 3. P. 9–40.

3. Korzo M.A. Kontrol' za soblyudeniem norm seksual'noi morali v pol'skoi derevne XVII–XVIII vv. [Control Over Observance of Sexual Morality Norms in Polish Rural Communities, the 17th–18th C.]. Socium. 2003. N 2. P. 165–184.

4. Korzo M.A. O formakh i soderzhanii nravstvennykh predpisanii v katolicheskoi nazidatel'noi literature rannego Novogo vremeni [On Forms and Contеnt of Moral Precepts in the Catholic Devotional Literature of the Early Modern Time]. Chelovek. 2018. N 6. P. 114–129.

5. Stoliarov A.A. Stoya i stoitsizm [Stoa and Stoicism]. Moscow: Kami Grupp Publ., 1995.

6. Foucault M. Nadzirat' i nakazyvat'. Rozhdenie tyur'my [Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison], transl. from French by B. Naumov, ed. I. Borisova. Moscow: Ad Marginem, 1999.

7. Elias N. O protsesse tsivilizatsii. Sotsiogeneticheskie i psikhogeneticheskie issledovaniya [The Civilizing Process: Sociogenetic and Psychogenetic Investigations], vol. 1. Moscow; S.-Petersburg: Universitetskaya kniga Publ., 2001.

8. Abel G. Stoizismus und Frühe Neuzeit: zur Entstehungsgeschichte modernen Denkens im Felde von Ethik und Politik. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1978.

9. Barbee D.M. Holy Desperation and Sanctified Wrath: Anger in Puritan Thought. Discourses of Anger in the Early Modern Period, eds. K.A.E. Enenkel, A. Traninger. Leiden: Brill, 2015. P. 172–192.

10. Bogner R.G. Die Bezähmung der Zunge. Literatur und Disziplinierung der Alltagskommunikation in der frühen Neuzeit. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag, 1997.

11. Bohatec J. Calvins Lehre von Staat und Kirche, mit besonderer Berücksichtigung des Organismusgedankens. Aalen: Scientia Verlag, 1968.

12. Buchholz W. Anfänge der Sozialdisziplinierung im Mittelalter. Zeitschrift für historische Forschung. 1991. Bd. 18. H. 2. S. 129–147.

13. Chaix C. Die schwierige Schule der Sitten – christliche Gemeinden, bürgerliche Obrigkeit und Sozialdisziplinierung im frühneuzeitlichen Köln, etwa 1450–1600. Zeitschrift für historische Forschung. 1994. Beiheft 16. S. 199–218.

14. Chareyre P. “The Great Difficulties One Must Bear to Follow Jesus Christ”: Morality in Sixteenth-Century Nîmes. Sins and the Calvinists. Moral Control and the Consistory in the Reformed Tradition, ed. R.A. Mentzer. Kirksville: Sixteenth Journal Publishers, 1994. P. 63–96.

15. Curtis T.C., Speck W.A. The Societies for the Reformation of Manners: a Case Study in the Theory and Practice of Moral Reform. Literature and History. 1976. Vol. III. P. 45–64.

16. Dinges M. Frühneuzeitliche Armenfürsorge als Sozialdisziplinierung? Geschichte und Gesellschaft. 1991. Bd. 17. S. 5–29.

17. Flynn M. Sacred Charity: Confraternities and Social Welfare in Spain, 1400–1700. London: Palgrave, 1989.

18. Forster M.R. The Counter-Reformation in the Villages. Religion and Reform in the Bishopric of Speyer, 1560–1720. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1992.

19. Friedeburg R. Sozialdisziplinierung in England? Zeitschrift für historische Forschung. 1990. Bd. 17. H. 4. S. 385–418.

20. Graham M.F. The Uses of Reform. “Godly Discipline” and Popular Behavior in Scotland and Beyond, 1560–1610. Leiden: Brill, 1996.

21. Grell O.P. The Protestant Imperative of Christian Care and Neighbourly Love. Health Care and Poor Relief in Protestant Europe 1500–1700, eds. O.P. Grell, A. Cunningham. London: Routledge, 1997. P. 42–63.

22. von Greyerz K. Der alltägliche Gott im 17. Jahrhundert. Zur religiös-konfessionellen Identität der englischen Puritaner. Pietismus und Neuzeit. 1990. Bd. 16. S. 11–30.

23. Hamm B. Normative Zentrierung im 15. und 16. Jahrhundert. Beobachtungen zu Religiosität, Theologie und Ikonologie. Hamm B. Religiosität im späten Mittelalter. Spannungspole, Neuaufbrüche, Normierungen. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2011. S. 3–40.

24. Harrington J.F. Reordering Marriage and Society in Reformation Germany. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1995.

25. Ingram M.J. Reformation of Manners in Early Modern England. The Experience of Authority in Early Modern England, eds. P. Griffiths, A. Fox, S. Hindle. London: Palgrave, 1996. P. 47–88.

26. Ingram M.J. Religion, Communities and Moral Discipline in Late Sixteenth and Early Seventeenth-century England: Case Studies. Religion and Society in Early Modern Europe, ed. K.von Greyerz. London: Allen & Unwin, 1984. P. 177–193.

27. Jaritz G. Das Bild des “Negativen” als Visualisierung der Übertretung von Ordnungen im Spätmittelalter. Anzeiger des Germanischen Nationalmuseum. Jahrgang 1993. S. 205–213.

28. King P. The Ideology of Order. A Comparative Analysis of Jean Bodin und Thomas Hobbes. London: Frank Cass Publ., 1999.

29. Kingdon R.M. The Control of Morals in Calvin’s Geneve. The Social History of the Reformation, eds. L.P. Buck, J.W. Zophy. Columbus: Chio State UP, 1972. P. 3–16.

30. Kuhr O. “Die Macht des Bannes und der Buße”. Kirchenzucht und die Erneuerung der Kirche bei Johannes Oekolampad (1482–1531). Bern: Peter Lang, 1999.

31. Lidman S. To report or not? To punish or not? Between Tightening Laws, Old Habits and Loyalty in early Modern Bavaria. Morality, Crime and Social Control in Europe 1500–1900, eds. O. Matikainen, S. Lidman. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society, 2014. P. 87–106.

32. Maier H. Sozialdisziplinierung – ein Begriff und seine Grenzen. Glaube und Eid, hrsg. von P. Prodi. München: R. Oldenbourg Verlag, 1993. S. 237–240.

33. Monter E.W. Enforcing Morality in Early Modern Europe. London: Variorum, 1987.

34. Münster P.M. Wiederentdeckung von Scham und Beschämung in der strafrechtlichen Sozialkontrolle: Das Konzept des “reintegrative shaming”. Shame Between Punishment and Penance, eds. B. Sère, J. Wettlaufer. Firenze: Sismel, 2013. P. 349–368.

35. Oestreich G. Neostoicism and the Early Modern State. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1982.

36. Oestreich G. Strukturprobleme des europäischen Absolutismus. Vierteljahrschrift für Sozial- und Wirtschaftsgeschichte. 1969. Bd. 55. S. 329–347.

37. Ogilvie S. “So That Every Subject Knows How to Behave”: Social Disciplining in Early Modern Bohemia. Comparative Studies in Society and History. 2006. Vol. 48. N 1. P. 38–78.

38. Pullan B. The Counter-Reformation, Medical Care and Poor Relief. Health Care and Poor Relief in Counter-Reformation Europe, eds. O.P. Grell, A. Cunningham, J. Arrizabalaga. London: Routledge, 1999. P. 17–31.

39. Räisänen-Schröder P. Improving the Christian Community. Agents and Objects of Control in Early Modern Church Visitations. Morality, Crime and Social Control in Europe 1500–1900, eds. O. Matikainen, S. Lidman. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society, 2014. P. 127–155.

40. Roberts M.J.D. Making English Morals. Voluntary Association and Moral Reform, 1787–1886. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2004.

41. Rublack H.-Ch. Lutherische Beichte und Sozialdisziplinierung. Archiv für Reformationsgeschichte. 1994. Bd. 84. S. 127–155.

42. Schilling H. Die Kirchenzucht im frühneuzeitlichen Europa in interkonfessionell vergleichender und interdisziplinärer Perspektive – eine Zwischenbilanz. Zeitschrift für historische Forschung. 1994. Beiheft 16. S. 11–40.

43. Schilling H. “History of Crime” or “History of Sin”? – Some Reflections on the Social History of Early Modern Church Discipline. Politics and Society in Reformation Europe, eds. E.I. Kouri, T. Scott. London: Macmillan, 1987. P. 289–310.

44. Schilling H. Reform and Supervision of Family Life in Germany and the Netherlands. Sins and the Calvinists. Moral Control and the Consistory in the Reformed Tradition, ed. R.A. Mentzer. Kirksville: Sixteenth Journal Publishers, 1994. P. 15–62.

45. Schilling M. Bildpublizistik der frühen Neuzeit. Aufgaben und Leistungen des illustrierten Flugblatts in Deutschland bis um 1700. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag, 1990.

46. Schmidt H.R. Die Christianisierung des Sozialverhaltens als permanente Reformation. Zeitschrift für historische Forschung. 1989. Beiheft 9. S. 113–163.

47. Schnabel-Schüle H. Kirchenzucht als Verbrechensprävention. Zeitschrift für historische Forschung. 1994. Beiheft 16. S. 49–64.

48. Schulze W. Gerhard Oestreichs Begriff “Sozialdisziplinierung in der Frühen Neuzeit”. Zeitschrift für historische Forschung. 1987. Bd. 14. S. 265–302.

49. Simon T. “Policing” and Morality: On the State Regulation of Faith and Morality in the Policy Decrees of the Early Modern Period. Between Creativity and Norm-Making. Tensions in the Later Middle Ages and the Early Modern Era, eds. S. Müller, C. Schweiger. Leiden: Brill, 2013. P. 241–252.

50. Smolinsky H. The Better Human Being: The Dispute on Morality in Humanism and the Reformation. Between Creativity and Norm-Making. Tensions in the Later Middle Ages and the Early Modern Era, eds. S. Müller, C. Schweiger. Leiden: Brill, 2013. P. 189–202.

51. Spierenburg P. Social Control and History. Social Control in Europe, eds. H. Roodenburg, P. Spierenburg. Vol. 1. 1500–1800. Columbus: Ohio State UP, 2004. P. 1–22.

52. Spufford M. Puritanism and Social Control? Order and Disorder in Early Modern England, eds. A. Fletcher, J. Stevenson. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2007. P. 41–57.

53. Strauss G. Luther’s House of Learning. Indoctrination of the Young in the German Reformation. Baltimore: The John Hopkins UP, 1978.

54. Willoweit D. Katholische Reform und Disziplinierung als Element der Staats- und Gesellschaftsorganisation. Glaube und Eid, hrsg. von P. Prodi. München: R. Oldenbourg Verlag, 1993. S. 113–132.

55. Ziegler E. Sitte und Moral in früheren Zeiten. Zur Rechtsgeschichte der Reichsstadt und Republik St. Gallen. Sigmaringen: Jan Thorbecke Verlag, 1991.