Modern concepts of public administration and institutional risks

 
PIIS020736760010114-4-1
DOI10.31857/S020736760010114-4
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Occupation: Chief Scientific Associate of Institute of Economy of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Affiliation: Institute of Economy of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Address: Moscow, Russian Federation
Occupation: Head of the Center for Public Administration’s Studies of Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences ( the RAS)
Affiliation: Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Journal nameObshchestvo i ekonomika
EditionIssue 6
Pages41-52
Abstract

The article deals with conceptual issues related to the formation and development of an institutional environment for improving the quality of public administration, and with the optimization of emerging institutional risks caused primarily by the introduction of digital technologies. The complex of theoretical and methodological problems associated with the transformation of public administration institutions in the context of the coming economic and social changes is studied.

Keywordspublic administration, "playmaker state", indicators of public administration quality, institutional risks, digital economy
Received28.06.2020
Publication date29.06.2020
Number of characters26256
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 3, views: 2697

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Ehkonomika obschestvennogo sektora / Pod red. P.V. Savchenko, I.A. Pogosova, E.N. Zhil'tsova // M.: INFRA-M, 2009. S.18.

2. Barabashev A.G. Krizis gosudarstvennogo upravleniya i ego vliyanie na osnovnye administrativnye paradigmy gosudarstva i byurokratii // Voprosy gosudarstvennogo i munitsipal'nogo upravleniya. 2016. № 3. S. 163-194.

3. Rubinshtejn A.Ya., Gorodetskij A.E. Gosudarstvennyj paternalizm i paternalistskij proval v teorii opekaemykh blag // Zhurnal institutsional'nykh issledovanij. 2018.Tom 10. № 4. S.38-58

4. Gorodetskij A.E. Instituty gosudarstvennogo upravleniya v usloviyakh novykh vyzovov sotsial'no-ehkonomicheskogo razvitiya. Monografiya. // M.: Institut ehkonomiki RAN.2018. 237s.

5. Voejkov M.I., Gorodetskij A.E. Grinberg R.S. Ehkonomicheskaya priroda gosudarstva: novyj rakurs: Preprint doklada. // M.: IEh RAN 2018. 54 s.

6. Tambovtsev V.L. Gosudarstvennoe regulirovanie gosudarstva: voprosy teorii, mezhdunarodnyj opyt, rossijskie reformy // M.: Rossijsko-Evropejskij tsentr ehkonomicheskoj politiki, 2004. 31 s.

7. Osborne D., Gaebler T. Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector // NYC.: Plume Publ., 1993. 432 s.

8. Gorodetskij A.E. Gosudarstvennoe upravlenie i ehkonomicheskaya bezopasnost'. O disfunktsiyakh gosudarstvennogo upravleniya // Audit i finansovyj analiz. 2016. № 6. S. 426-436.

9. Krasil'nikov D.G., Sivintseva O.V., Troitskaya E.A. Sovremennye zapadnye upravlencheskie modeli: sintez New public management i Good governance // Ars Administrandi. 2014. № 2. S. 45–62.

10. Smotritskaya I.I. Novaya ehkonomicheskaya strategiya trebuet novogo kachestva gosudarstvennogo upravleniya // Vestnik instituta ehkonomiki RAN. 2017. № 5. S. 7-22.

11. Sulakshin S.S. Teoriya i fenomenologiya uspeshnosti slozhnosti sotsial'noj sistemy // M.: Nauchnyj ehkspert, 2013. 232 s.

12. Worldwide Governance Indicators [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. – URL: http://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/ (data obrascheniya: 15.03.2020).

13. Monchin'ska Eh. Gosudarstvo v usloviyakh tsifrovoj revolyutsii // Mir peremen. 2018. № 3. S. 10-25.

14. O’Sullivan S., Walker Ch. From the interpersonal to the internet: social service digitization and the implications for vulnerable individuals and communities // Australian Journal of Political Science. 2018. Vol. 53. № 4. P. 1–18. DOI: 10.1080/10361146.2018.1519064.

15. Petrov M., Burov V., Shklyaruk M., Sharov A. Gosudarstvo kak platforma. (Kiber) gosudarstvo dlya tsifrovoj ehkonomiki. Doklad Tsentra strategicheskikh razrabotok // M., 2018. http://www.csr.ru

16. Janowski T. Digital government evolution: From transformation to contextualization // Government Information Quarterly. 2015. Vol. 32. Issue 3. P. 221–236. DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2015.07.001.

17. Smotritskaya I.I. Kontraktnaya sistema zakupok v kontekste rossijskikh reform // Vestnik Instituta ehkonomiki RAN. 2019. № 6. S. 9-25.

18. Korshunov G., Krojtor S. Tsifrovaya gramotnost' kak klyuchevoj faktor uspeshnoj adaptatsii cheloveka i obschestva k tsifrovym realiyam // Obschestvo i ehkonomika. 2020. № 1. S. 38-58.

19. Smotritskaya I.I., Chernykh S.I., Shuvalov S.S. Strategicheskie riski gosudarstvennogo upravleniya v usloviyakh tsifrovoj ehkonomiki // Problemy analiza riska. 2019. № 6. S. 38-49.

20. Barefoot K. et al. Defining and Measuring the Digital Economy. BEA Working Paper 3/15/2018. Rezhim dostupa: https://www.bea.gov/sites/default/files/papers/defining-and-measuring-the-digital-economy.pdf

21. Yuzik Yu. «Novye nebesa» dlya Podnebesnoj. 24.03.2020. [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. – URL: https://russian.rt.com/opinion/731295-yuzik-kitai-koronavirus-cifrovaya-revoluciya (data obrascheniya: 10.04.2020)

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up