New Dimensions of Identity Politics: Contested Memories in History Museums of the 20th Century

 
PIIS013122270010237-1-1
DOI10.20542/0131-2227-2020-64-5-16-32
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Occupation: Deputy Director
Affiliation: Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations, Russian Academy of Sciences (IMEMO)
Address: 23, Profsoyuznaya Str., Moscow 117997, Russian Federation
Journal nameMirovaia ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniia
EditionVolume 64 Issue 5
Pages16-32
Abstract

The author considers politics of memory as a key component of identity politics promoted by the nation state and views social history museums representing memories of the recent past as key actors involved in national identity formation. A comparative analysis of a range of new exhibitions recently set up in European museums of the 20th century history in countries with a story of empire, a postcolonial legacy and a fascist past reveals important common features in presenting difficult pasts. This includes resorting to narrative history and to individual memories, appealing to everyday life as a depositary of national memory and a reflection of national identity, and promoting the representation of a growing cultural diversity of contemporary societies. Common to new exhibition spaces is also the domination of visual means of representation over artifacts in line with attempts to promote an emotional dialogue with an individual visitor and to engage with various communities bearing different collective memories. Today, museums are actively involved in reconsidering difficult pasts and in looking for new possibilities to present contested memories. The study also reveals notable differences in the agenda and in the intensity of public discussion of difficult national pasts, in the level of political engagement of various actors and their commitment to promote identity politics focused on social cohesion and development. These differences reflect changes in political culture and political identity transformations societies in Western Europe and Russia are currently undergoing. The research appeals to “new museology” and critical heritage studies and promotes a wide approach to understanding identity politics and a methodology of its critical assessment. Empirical data were collected by the author during her visits to leading West European and Russian social history museums and complemented by data available on museum websites.

Keywordsidentity politics, memory politics, historic narrative, political discourse, interest groups, communities, difficult past, contested memories, museum of social (contemporary) history, empire, postcolonialism, nation state, national identity, cultural heritage, “new museology”
Received14.04.2020
Publication date16.04.2020
Number of characters67027
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.
Размещенный ниже текст является ознакомительной версией и может не соответствовать печатной
1 В последние несколько лет идентичность как вопрос политической повестки дня неизменно присутствует в публичном пространстве. Это пример стремительного укоренения в политическом дискурсе понятия, ранее привычного для сугубо научной дискуссии1. Последствия такого понятийного заимствования для понимания того, что такое идентичность в ее политическом измерении и как происходит ее утверждение в общественном сознании, очевидны: формирование идентичности стало ключевой проблемой практической политики государства. При этом частая и настойчивая, к месту и не к месту, апелляция к идентичности публичных политиков сопровождается размыванием содержательного наполнения самого концепта. Это и понятно: смысловая неопределенность дает, по существу, неограниченные возможности политического использования естественного стремления индивида ощущать себя частью сообщества. Очевидно и то, что картина мира современного человека в условиях новых угроз социальной (в широком смысле) безопасности подвержена разным влияниям и уязвима для манипулирования. Сказывается и противоречивое воздействие на политическое сознание и поведение информационных потоков и новейших технологий, когда фрагментарная информация и упрощенные визуальные образы вытесняют размышления о содержании социальных процессов и мотивациях их участников, подменяя смыслы впечатлениями и эмоциями. 1. Тематика идентичности на глазах становится частью интеллектуального мейнстрима: это состояние четко зафиксировал выход в 2018 г. небольшой книги Фрэнсиса Фукуямы, посвященной политике идентичности [3].
2

ПОЛИТИКА ИДЕНТИЧНОСТИ В СОВРЕМЕННОМ НАУЧНОМ ДИСКУРСЕ

3 Содержательная трактовка политики идентичности и возможностей ее применения в управленческих практиках оказывается далеко не однозначной. Вопрос о том, что такая политика действительно проводится в любом государстве, независимо от характера политического режима и культурных традиций, в целом не вызывает сегодня споров ни у исследователей, ни среди действующих политиков. При том, что она нечасто так именуется и редко трактуется как целенаправленная политическая деятельность или как самостоятельное направление политического курса, нацеленного на формирование национальной и политической идентичности.
4 Мейнстримом стала и массированная критика такой политики, причем под разными углами зрения – как ввиду опасностей индоктринации массовых групп со стороны политических элит, так и из-за реальных угроз навязывания выгодных одним группам приоритетов за счет других путем отстаивания “права на идентичность”. В этом случае речь идет о доминировании интересов групп меньшинств в ущерб большинству в том, что касается выбора культурных ориентиров публичной политики и утверждения ее ценностных основ (в обобщенном виде эти аргументы изложены, например, в упомянутой книге Ф. Фукуямы [3]). В социальной реальности ХХI в. «политическая культура сдалась под напором культурной политики, а эстетический опыт должен работать на продвижение “социального понимания”» [4, p. 608]. Тем более остро в прикладном, политико-управленческом контексте стоит вопрос о наполнении конкретным содержанием самого понятия “культурной политики”, или политики в сфере культуры. Такая политика не сводится к утвердившемуся в публичном пространстве пониманию – государственной поддержке инициатив в сфере традиционной, массовой или “высокой” культуры (то есть адресованному учреждениям культуры госзаказу или содействию работающим в сфере культуры НКО) и правовой охране памятников. Мотивационной основой культурной политики становится политика идентичности.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 1059

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Semenenko I. Proshloe na perednem krae politiki identichnosti. Mirovaya ehkonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 2018, t. 62, № 11, ss. 65-76. [Semenenko I. Proshloe na perednem krae politiki identichnosti [History on the Frontline of Identity Politics]. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 2018, vol. 62, no. 11, pp. 65-76.] DOI:10.20542/0131-2227-2018-62-11-65-76

2. Semenenko I.S., Lapkin V.V., Bardin A.L., Pantin V.I. Mezhdu gosudarstvom i natsiej: dilemmy identichnosti na postsovetskom prostranstve. Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya, 2017, № 5, ss. 54-78. [Semenenko I.S., Lapkin V.V., Bardin A.L., Pantin V.I. Mezhdu gosudarstvom i natsiei: dilemmy identichnosti na postsovetskom prostranstve [Between the State and the Nation: Dilemmas of Identity Politics in Post-Soviet Societies]. Polis. Political Studies, 2017, no. 5, pp. 54-78.] DOI:10.17976/jpps/2017.05.05

3. Fukuyama F. Identity: The demand for dignity and the politics of resentment. New York, Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2018. 240 p.

4. Steyn J. The Museums’ Future. Futures, 2006, vol. 38, pp. 606-618.

5. Minenkov G.Ya. Politika identichnosti: vzglyad sovremennoj sotsial'noj teorii. Politicheskaya nauka, 2005, № 3, ss. 21-38. [Minenkov G.Ya. Politika identichnosti: vzglyad sovremennoi sotsial'noi teorii [Identity Politics: the view of contemporary social theory]. Political Science, 2005, no. 3, pp. 21-38.]

6. Semenenko I.S., red. Politicheskaya identichnost' i politika identichnosti v 2-kh tt. T. 1: Identichnost' kak kategoriya politicheskoj nauki: slovar' terminov i ponyatij. Moskva, ROSSPEhN, 2011. 208 s. [Semenenko I.S., ed. Politicheskaya identichnost' i politika identichnosti v 2 tt. T. 1: Identichnost' kak kategoriya politicheskoi nauki: slovar' terminov i ponyatii [Political Identity and Identity Politics. Vol. 1: Identity as a Category of Political Science: a Glossary of Terms and Concepts]. Moscow, ROSSPEN, 2011. 208 p.]

7. Panov P.V., Sulimov K.A., Fadeeva L.A., red. Bor'ba za identichnost' i novye instituty kommunikatsii. Moskva, ROSSPEhN, 2012. 263 r. [Panov P.V., Sulimov K.A., Fadeeva L.A., eds. Bor'ba za identichnost' i novye instituty kommunikatsii [The Struggle for Identity and New Institutions of Communication]. Moscow, ROSSPEN, 2012. 263 p.]

8. Malinova O.Yu. Aktual'nost' proshlogo: istoriya, pamyat' i politika identichnosti. Diskursologiya: metodologiya, teoriya, praktika, 2016, № 10, ss. 156-166. [Malinova O.Yu. Aktual'nost' proshlogo: istoriya, pamyat' i politika identichnosti [The Urgency of a Usable Past: History, Memory and Identity politics]. Diskursologiya: metodologiya, teoriya, praktika, 2016, no. 10, pp. 156-166.]

9. Semenenko I.S., otv. red. Identichnost': Lichnost', obschestvo, politika. Ehntsiklopedicheskoe izdanie. Moskva, Ves' Mir, 2017. 992 s. [Semenenko I.S., eds. Identichnost': Lichnost', obshchestvo, politika. Ehntsiklopedicheskoe izdanie [Identity: Personality, Society, Politics]. Moscow, Ves' Mir, 2017. 992 p.]

10. Malinova O.Yu. i dr., red. Simvolicheskaya politika. Vypusk 5. Politika identichnosti. Moskva, INION RAN, 2017. 356 s. [Malinova O.Yu. et al., eds. Simvolicheskaya politika. Vypusk 5. Politika identichnosti [Symbolic Politics. Issue 5. Identity Politics]. Moscow, INION RAS, 2017. 356 p.]

11. Popova O.V. Gosudarstvennaya politika identichnosti kak teoreticheskij konstrukt i real'naya praktika: opyt ehkspertnykh otsenok. Yuzhno-rossijskij zhurnal sotsial'nykh nauk, 2019, t. 20, № 4, ss. 74-91. [Popova O.V. Gosudarstvennaya politika identichnosti kak teoreticheskii konstrukt i real'naya praktika: opyt ehkspertnykh otsenok [Identity Policy at National Level as a Theoretical Construct and Real Practice: Expert Assessments Attempt]. South-Russian Journal of Social Sciences, 2019, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 74-91.] DOI:10.31429/26190567-20-4-74-91

12. Drobizheva L.M. Rossijskaya identichnost': faktory integratsii i problemy razvitiya. Sotsiologicheskaya nauka i sotsial'naya praktika, 2013, № 1 (01), ss. 74-84. [Drobizheva L.M. Rossiiskaya identichnost': faktory integratsii i problemy razvitiya [Russian identity: the factors of integration and problems of development]. Socioligical Science and Social Practice, 2013, no. 1 (01), pp. 74-84.]

13. Drobizheva L.M. Rossijskaya identichnost': diskussii v politicheskom prostranstve i dinamika massovogo soznaniya. Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya, 2018, № 5, ss. 100-115. [Drobizheva L.M. Rossiiskaya identichnost': diskussii v politicheskom prostranstve i dinamika massovogo soznaniya [Russian Identity: Discussions in the Political Space and Dynamics of Mass Consciousness]. Polis. Political Studies, 2018, no. 5, pp. 100-115.] DOI:10.17976/jpps/2018.05.09

14. Avksent'ev V.A., Aksyumov B.V., Vasil'chenko V.A., Denisova G.S. Rossijskaya identichnost' i politika identichnosti: konstruktsiya i dekonstruktsiya. Stavropol', SKFU, 2018. 214 s. [Avksent'ev V.A., Aksyumov B.V., Vasil'chenko V.A., Denisova G.S. Rossiiskaya identichnost' i politika identichnosti: konstruktsiya i dekonstruktsiya [Russian identity and identity politics: construction and deconstruction]. Stavropol, SKFU, 2018. 214 p.]

15. Tsumarova E.Yu. Politika identichnosti v regionakh Rossii: teoreticheskij i prakticheskij aspekty (na primere Respubliki Kareliya). Diss. kand. polit. nauk. Sankt-Peterburg, 2014. 157 s. [Tsumarova E.Yu. Politika identichnosti v regionakh Rossii: teoreticheskii i prakticheskii aspekty (na primere Respubliki Kareliya). Diss. kand. polit. nauk [Identity policy in the regions of Russia: theoretical and practical aspects (on the example of the Republic of Karelia) Cand. Diss. (Polit.)]. Sankt-Peterburg, 2014. 157 p.]

16. Nazukina M.V. Mezhdu Uralom i Povolzh'em: poiski permskoj identichnosti. Perm', Pechatnyj Salon Garmoniya, 2018. 196 s. [Nazukina M.V. Mezhdu Uralom i Povolzh'em: poiski permskoi identichnosti [Between the Urals and the Volga region: search for Permian identity]. Perm, Pechatnyi Salon Garmoniya, 2018. 196 p.]

17. Sagitova L.V. Respublika Tatarstan: Politika identichnosti i ee aktory. Kazan', Institut istorii im. Sh. Mardzhani AN RT, 2018. 360 s. [Sagitova L.V. Respublika Tatarstan: Politika identichnosti i ee aktory [The Republic of Tatarstan: Identity Politics and Its Actors]. Kazan’, Institut istorii im. Sh. Mardzhani AN RT, 2018. 360 p.]

18. Sarkisyan O.L., otv. red. Problema natsional'noj identichnosti v usloviyakh globalizatsii (mezhdistsiplinarnye aspekty). Materialy respublikanskoj nauchnoj konferentsii 5 noyabrya 2013. Erevan, Izdatel'stvo RAU, 2014. 144 s. [Sarkisyan O.L., ed. Problema natsional'noi identichnosti v usloviyakh globalizatsii (mezhdistsiplinarnye aspekty). Materialy respublikanskoi nauchnoi konferentsii 5 noyabrya 2013 [The problem of national identity in the context of globalization (interdisciplinary aspects)]. Yerevan, Izdatel'stvo RAU, 2014. 144 p.]

19. Dunaev V., Kurganskaya V., Shaikemelov M. Identity politics in Managing the System Risks of Nation-Building: on the Example of the republic of Kazakhstan. Baltic Journal of European Studies, 2019, vol. 9, no. 1 (26), pp. 99-114.

20. Tsumarova E.Yu. Politika identichnosti: politics ili policy? Vestnik Permskogo universiteta, Seriya “Politologiya”, 2012, №2 (18), ss. 5-16. [Tsumarova E.Yu. Politika identichnosti: politics ili policy? [Identity Politics: politics or policy?]. Vestnik Permskogo Universiteta, Ser. “Politologiya”, 2012, no. 2 (18), pp. 5-16.]

21. Sherrer Yu. Germaniya i Frantsiya: prorabotka proshlogo. Pro et Contra, 2009, t. 13, № 3–4, maj–avgust, ss. 89-108. [Scherrer J. Germaniya i Frantsiya: prorabotka proshlogo [Germany and France: Processing the Past]. Pro et Contra, 2009, vol. 13, no. 3–4, May–August, pp. 89-108.]

22. Shtompka P. Sotsial'noe izmenenie kak travma. Stat'ya pervaya. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 2001, № 1, ss. 6-16. [Sztompka P. Sotsial'noe izmenenie kak travma. Stat'ya pervaya [Social Change as Trauma]. Sociological studies, 2001, no. 1, pp. 6-16.]

23. Malinova O.Yu., red. Simvolicheskaya politika. Vypusk 1. Konstruirovanie predstavlenij o proshlom kak vlastnyj resurs. Moskva, INION RAN, 2012. 336 s. [Malinova O.Yu., ed. Simvolicheskaya politika. Vypusk 1. Konstruirovanie predstavlenii o proshlom kak vlastnyi resurs [Symbolic Politics. Issue 1. The construction of ideas about the past as an imperious resource]. Moscow, INION RAS, 2012. 336 p.]

24. Malinova O.Yu. Aktual'noe proshloe: simvolicheskaya politika vlastvuyuschej ehlity i dilemmy rossijskoj identichnosti. Moskva, Politicheskaya ehntsiklopediya, 2015. 207 s. [Malinova O.Yu. Aktual'noe proshloe: simvolicheskaya politika vlastvuyushchei ehlity i dilemmy rossiiskoi identichnosti [A Timely Past: Symbolic Politics of the Elite in Power and Dilemmas of Russian Identity]. Moscow, Politicheskaya entsiklopediya, 2015. 207 p.]

25. Vergo P., ed. The New Museology. London, Reaktion Books, 1989. 238 p.

26. Macdonald S., Fyfe G., eds. Theorizing Museums: Representing Identity and Diversity in a Changing World. Oxford, Blackwell Publishing, 1996. 244 p.

27. Shedevry smotryat na nas. Delovoj zavtrak s Mikhailom Piotrovskim. Rossijskaya gazeta, 26.12.2019. [Masterpieces are watching us. A business breakfast with Mikhail Piotrovsky]. Rossiyskaya Gazeta, 26.12.2019 (In Russ.)]

28. Nora P., ed. Les lieux de mémoire. Paris, Gallimard (Bibliothèque illustrée des histoires), 3 tomes: t. 1 La République. 1984. 674 p.; t. 2 La Nation. 1986. 610 p.; t. 3 Les France. 1992. 1040 p.

29. Nora P. Vsemirnoe torzhestvo pamyati. Neprikosnovennyj zapas, 2005, № 2–3 (40–41). [Nora P. Vsemirnoe torzhestvo pamyati [Worldwide Triumph of Memory]. Neprikosnovennyi zapas, 2005, no. 2–3 (40–41).] Available at: https://magazines.gorky.media/nz/2005/2 (accessed 17.01.2020).

30. Nora P. Between Memory and History: Les Lieux de Mémoire. Special Issue. Memory and Counter-Memory. Representations, 1989, no. 26, pp. 7-24.

31. Nora P. Mezhdu pamyat'yu i istoriej: problematika mest pamyati. Frantsiya-Pamyat'. Pod red. Nora P. Sankt-Peterburg, SPbGU, 1999, cc. 17-50. [Nora P. Mezhdu pamyat'yu i istoriei: problematika mest pamyati [Between Memory and History: Sites of Memory]. Frantsiya-Pamyat' [France-Memory]. Nora P., ed. Saint-Petersburg, Saint-Petersburg University Press, 1999, pp. 17-50.]

32. Assmann A. Der lange Schatten der Vergangenheit – Erinnerungskultur und Geschichtspolitik. Munich, C.H. Beck Publishers, 2006. 320 p.

33. Assman A.A. Dlinnaya ten' proshlogo: Memorial'naya kul'tura i istoricheskaya politika. Moskva, Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2014. 328 s. [Assman A.A. Dlinnaya ten' proshlogo: Memorial'naya kul'tura i istoricheskaya politika [The Long Shadow of the Past: Memorial Culture and Historical Politics] Moscow, Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2014. 328 p.]

34. Khal'bvaks M. Kollektivnaya i istoricheskaya pamyat'. Neprikosnovennyj zapas, 2005, № 2–3 (40–41). [Khal'bvaks M. Kollektivnaya i istoricheskaya pamyat' [On Collective and Historic Memory]. Neprikosnovennyi zapas, 2005, no. 2–3 (40–41).] Available at: https://magazines.gorky.media/nz/2005/2 (accessed 17.01.2020).

35. Khal'bvaks M. Sotsial'nye ramki pamyati. Moskva, Novoe izdatel'stvo, 2007. 348 s. [Original Edition: Halbwachs M. Les Cadres Sociaux de la Memoires. Paris, Presse Universitaire de France, 1925.]

36. Erll A. The Invention of Cultural Memory: A Short History of Memory Studies. Erll A. Memory in Culture. London, Palgrave Macmillan, 2011. pp. 13-37.

37. Malinova O.Yu. i dr., red. Simvolicheskaya politika. Vypusk 2. Spory o proshlom kak proektirovanie buduschego. Moskva, INION RAN, 2014. 382 s. [Malinova O.Yu. et al., eds. Simvolicheskaya politika. Vypusk 2. Spory o proshlom kak proektirovanie budushchego [Symbolic Politics. Issue 2. Disputes about the Past as Designing the Future]. Moscow, INION RAS, 2014. 382 p.]

38. Miller A.I., Efremenko D.V., red. Metodologicheskie voprosy izucheniya politiki pamyati. Moskva, Sankt-Peterburg, Nestor-Istoriya, 2018. 224 s. [Miller A.I, Efremenko D.V., eds. Metodologicheskie voprosy izucheniya politiki pamyati [Methodological issues of studying memory policy: A collection of scientific papers]. Moscow, St. Petersburg, Nestor-Istoriya, 2018. 224 p.]

39. The Learning Museum. Report 7. New trends in museums of the 21st century. The Learning Museum Network Project. Ed.by A. Nicholls, M. Pereira and M. Sani. Bologna, Istituto per i Beni Artistici Culturali e Naturali, Regione Emilia Romagna (Italy), 2013. 140 p.

40. Arnold-de-Simine S. Mediating Memory in the Museum. Trauma, Empathy, Nostalgia. London, Palgrave Macmillan, 2013. 239 p.

41. Ionin L.G. Politkorrektnost': divnyj novyj mir. Moskva, Ad Marginem Press, 2012. 112 s. [Ionin L.G. Politkorrektnost': divnyi novyi mir [Political Correctness: A Brave New World]. Moscow, Ad Marginem Press, 2012. 112 p.]

42. Ionin L.G. Vosstanie men'shinstv. Moskva, Sankt-Peterburg, Universitetskaya kniga, 2012. 237 s. [Ionin L.G. Vosstanie men'shinstv [The Rebellion of minorities]. Moscow, Saint-Petersburg, Universitetskaya kniga, 2012. 237 p.]

43. Miller A.I. Politika pamyati v postkommunisticheskoj Evrope i ee vozdejstvie na evropejskuyu kul'turu pamyati. Politiya, 2016, № 1, ss. 111-121. [Miller A.I. Politika pamyati v postkommunisticheskoi Evrope i ee vozdeistvie na evropeiskuyu kul'turu pamyati [Politics of Memory in Post-Communist Europe and Its Impact on European Culture of Memory]. Politeia, 2016, no. 1, pp. 111-121.] DOI:10.30570/2078-5089-2016-80-1-111-121

44. Harrison R. Heritage Critical Approaches. Abingdon, UK, Routledge, 2013. 288 p.

45. Bennet T., Cameron F., Dias N., Dibley B., Harrison R., Jacknis I., McCarthy C. Collecting, Ordering, Governing. Anthropology, Museums, and Liberal Government. London, Duke University Press Books, 2017. 360 p.

46. Otherwise. Rethinking Museums and Heritage. Carmah Paper No. 1. Centre for Anthropological Research on Museums and Heritage. Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 2019. Available at: http://www.carmah.berlin/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Carmah_Paper-1.pdf (accessed 17.01.2020).

47. Aldrich R. Colonial museums in a postcolonial Europe. Thomas D., ed. Museums in Postcolonial Europe. Abingdon, Oxon & New York, Routledge, 2010, pp. 12-31.

48. Khrebtan-Hörhager J. Musée du Quai Branly: The Heart of Darkness in la Cité de la Lumièr. Communication, Culture and Critique, 2018, vol. 11, issue 2, pp. 315-340. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/ccc/tcy006

49. Pozzi L. A City, its History, and its Museum(s): Making the Shanghai History Museum / Shanghai Revolution Museum. Echoes: Shanghai History Museum / Shanghai Revolution Museum Report № 1. Warsaw, 2019. Available at: http://projectechoes.eu/wp-content/uploads/Pozzi-Shanghai-History-Museum-Report-1.pdf (accessed 17.01.2020).

50. Kruglyj stol “Istoricheskaya pamyat' – esche odno prostranstvo, gde reshayutsya politicheskie zadachi”. Rossiya v global'noj politike, 2020. Available at: https://globalaffairs.ru/global-processes/Istoricheskaya-pamyat--esche-odno-prostranstvo-gde-reshayutsya-politicheskie-zadachi-20316 (accessed 27.01.2020).

51. Chakrabarty D. History and the Politics of Recognition. Jenkins K., ed. Manifestos for History. London, Routledge, 2007. pp. 77-87. Available at: https://epdf.pub/manifestos-for-history.html (accessed 27.01.2020).

52. Difficult Histories & Positive Identities. Conference Briefing 25–26 February 2019. Windsor, Berkshire, Cumberland Lodge, 2019. Available at: https://www.cumberlandlodge.ac.uk/sites/default/files/public/Difficult%20Histories%20Briefing%20Doc2.pdf (accessed 17.01.2020).

53. Cameron F. and Kelly l., eds. Hot Topics, Public Culture, Museums. Newcastle-upon-Tyne, Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2010. 340 p.

54. Makhotina E.I. Narrativy muzealizatsii, politika vospominaniya, pamyat' kak shou: Novye napravleniya memory studies v Germanii. Metodologicheskie voprosy izucheniya politiki pamyati. Otv. red. Miller A.I., Efremenko D.V. Moskva–Sankt-Peterburg, Nestor-Istoriya, 2018, ss. 75-92. [Makhotina E.I. Narrativy muzealizatsii, politika vospominaniya, pamyat' kak shou: Novye napravleniya memory studies v Germanii [Museization narratives, politics of remembrance, memory as a show: new directions in memory studies in Germany]. Metodologicheskie voprosy izucheniya politiki pamyati [Methodological issues of studying the politics of memory]. Miller A.I., Efremenko D.V., eds. Moscow–Saint-Petersburg, Nestor-History, 2018, pp. 75-92.]

55. Bartolini F. From Iconoclasm to Museum: Mussolini’s Villa in Rome as a Dictatorial Heritage Site. Martor, 2018, no. 23, pp. 163-173.

56. Kholodkovskij K.G. Italiya: massy i politika. Moskva, Nauka, 1989. 256 s. [Kholodkovskii K.G. Italiya: massy i politika [Italy: masses and politics]. Moscow, Nauka, 1989. 256 p.]

57. Noiret S. A Museum of Fascism where Mussolini was Born and Buried? Digital and Public History, 13.06.2017. Available at: https://dph.hypotheses.org/1081 (accessed 27.01.2020).

58. Noiret S. La public history italiana si fa strada: un museo a Predappio per narrare la storia del ventennio fascista. Digital and Public History, 09.05.2016. Available at: https://dph.hypotheses.org/906 (accessed 27.01.2020).

59. Repina L.P. Nauka i obschestvo: publichnaya istoriya v kontekste istoricheskoj kul'tury ehpokhi globalizatsii. Uchenye zapiski Kazanskogo universiteta. Seriya Gumanitarnye nauki, 2015, t. 157, № 3, ss. 55-67. [Repina L.P. Nauka i obshchestvo: publichnaya istoriya v kontekste istoricheskoi kul'tury epokhi globalizatsii [Science and Society: Public history in the context of the historical culture of the globalization era]. Uchenye zapiski Kazanskogo universiteta. Seriya Gumanitarnye nauki, 2015, vol. 157, no. 3, pp. 55-67.]

60. Wimmer A. Nation Building. Why Some Countries Come Together While Others Fall Apart. Princeton and Oxford, Princeton University Press, 2018. 376 p.

61. Lapkin V.V. Global'naya interlyudiya: ot unipolyarnoj disfunktsii k novomu miroporyadku. Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya, 2019, № 6, ss. 128-144. [Lapkin V.V. Global'naya interlyudiya: ot unipolyarnoi disfunktsii k novomu miroporyadku [Global Interlude: from Unipolar Dysfunction to a New World Order]. Polis. Political Studies, 2019, no. 6, pp. 128-144.] DOI:10.17976/jpps/2019.06.10

62. McLeod C. Negotiating a national memory: the British Empire & Commonwealth Museum African and Black Diaspora. An International Journal, Issue 2, Museums in Postcolonial Europe, 2009, vol. 2, pp. 157-165.

63. Gildea R. Empires of the Mind. The Colonial Past and the Politics of the Present. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2019. 366 p.

64. Bruckmuller E. The Development of Austrian National Identity. Luther K.R., Pulzer P., eds. Austria 1945–1995. Fifty years of the Second Republic. Aldershot, Ashgate publishing, 1998, pp. 83-109.

65. Khlevnyuk D., Yudin G. Analiticheskij otchet i kross-kul'turnoe issledovanie: Moral'nye dilemmy XXI veka. [Khlevnyuk D., Yudin G. Analiticheskii otchet i kross-kul'turnoe issledovanie: Moral'nye dillemy XXI veka [Analytical report and cross-cultural study: Moral dilemmas for the XXI century]. Available at: http://trudnaya-pamyat.ru/ (accessed 05.02.2020).

66. Zavadskij A., Sklez V., Suverina K. Politika affekta: muzej kak prostranstvo publichnoj istorii. Moskva, Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2019. 400 s. [Zavadsky A., Sklez V., Suverina K. Politika affekta: Muzey kak prostranstvo publichnoy istorii [Politics of affect: the museum as a space of public history]. Moscow, Novoye literaturnoye obozreniye, 2019. 400 p.]

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up