DOCTRINAL ASPECTS OF LEGAL DATA REGIMES IN THE CONDITIONS OF DEVELOPMENT OF BIG DATA TECHNOLOGIES (BIG DATA)

Occupation: Associate Professor of the Department of Information Law and Digital Technologies
Affiliation: Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education “Saratov State Law Academy”
Address: Russian Federation, Saratov

Abstract

The article examines the concept, features, essence of the legal regime of data, as well as trends in the legislator's approaches in this area in connection with the development of big data technology. Theoretical foundations and unity in the understanding of legal terms and constructions lead to holistic, effective legal regulation. The state's attention in recent years has been aimed at establishing such a balance in the field of ensuring the development of digital technologies, in which digital and technological sovereignty would be achieved, as well as human rights would be ensured. The legal regime of data in such conditions determines the prospects for the development of most technologies. The purpose of the article is to identify such doctrinal foundations of legal data regimes as the concept, structure, types, as well as to study the features of the legal regime of big data. Materials and methods of research: The work uses methods of both empirical (analysis and synthesis, induction and deduction, systematization) and theoretical (methods of constructing and studying the object of study and methods of constructing and justifying theoretical knowledge) levels. Results. Various approaches to understanding the essence of the legal regime are considered, as a result of which the author formulates a definition of the concept of “legal regime of data” and highlights its features. The article presents an analysis of the types of legal regime of data, identified on the basis of an analysis of regulatory and law enforcement material, an analysis of doctrinal approaches to the types of legal regimes and legal regimes of information. Attention is paid to the consideration of the general data regime and the need to develop this regime in relation to non-personal data. A definition of the concept of legal regime of personal data is given. The author draws attention to the variety of types of legal regimes of personal data, considers the features of the general regime of personal data, its differences from the general legal regime of information. The experimental legal regime of data, the legal regime of anonymized data, and the formation of a civil legal regime of data are considered. The goals and objectives facing these legal regimes, trends in the transformation of the content of legal regimes of personal data are analyzed. The author concludes that it is necessary to maintain a balance between the right to information and the principle of human privacy, protecting confidentiality and promoting innovation. The article concludes that there is no need to form a separate legal regime for big data. However, a set of rules regarding other legal data regimes should eliminate conflicts and contribute to the effective development and implementation of Big Data technologies.

Keywords

big data, legal regime, personal data, depersonalization, experiment, experimental legal regime, information technology, artificial intelligence.

Received

01.03.2024

GOST
MLA	Лескина, Элеонора "DOCTRINAL ASPECTS OF LEGAL DATA REGIMES IN THE CONDITIONS OF DEVELOPMENT OF BIG DATA TECHNOLOGIES (BIG DATA)." Journal of Russian Law DOI: 10.61205/S160565900029990-3
APA	Лескина Э. (). DOCTRINAL ASPECTS OF LEGAL DATA REGIMES IN THE CONDITIONS OF DEVELOPMENT OF BIG DATA TECHNOLOGIES (BIG DATA). Journal of Russian Law DOI: 10.61205/S160565900029990-3

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

1. Alekseev S.S. Obschaya teoriya prava: uchebnik. Moskva: Prospekt, 2011. S. 241.

2. Antopol'skij A.A. Pravovoe regulirovanie informatsii ogranichennogo dostupa v sfere gosudarstvennogo upravleniya: dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2004. S. 18.

3. Arkhipov V.V. Internet-pravo: uchebnik i praktikum dlya bakalavriata i magistratury. M., 2016. S. 120 - 121.

4. Afzaletdinova G.Kh. Isklyuchitel'nye rezhimy v rossijskom prave: diss. … kand. yurid. nauk. Moskva, 2016. S. 63.

5. Bakhrakh D.N. Administrativnoe pravo. M., 1996. S. 201.

6. Bachilo I.L. Informatsionnoe pravo: uchebnik dlya vuzov/ I.L. Bachilo. 5-e izdanie. Moskva., 2020. S. 79 – 81.

7. Belitskaya A.V. Pravovoe obespechenie razvitiya innovatsionnoj deyatel'nosti v Rossijskoj Federatsii // Zakonodatel'stvo. 2012. N 11. S. 31 – 39.

8. Vasilenko O.V. Problemy pravovogo opredeleniya ponyatij "innovatsiya" i "innovatsionnaya deyatel'nost'" // Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta. Seriya: Yurisprudentsiya. 2015. N 1. S. 22 – 30.

9. Vedomstvennoe normotvorchestvo (teoriya i praktika primeneniya): monogr. / pod red. M.A. Lapinoj, V.A. Baranova. M.: Prospekt, 2014. 240 s.

10. Grazhdanskoe pravo: uchebnik / pod red. d. yu. n, prof. O.N. Sadikova. «Kontrakt»: "INFRA-M", 2007. T. 1.

11. Efimtseva T.V. Innovatsionnye pravootnosheniya: ponyatie, struktura, vidy // Mezhdunarodnyj zhurnal ehksperimental'nogo obrazovaniya. 2010. N 1. S. 38 - 39.

12. Ivanova L.N., Terskaya G.A. Tochki rosta i drajvery rosta: k voprosu o soderzhanii ponyatij // Zhurnal institutsional'nykh issledovanij. 2015. T. 7. N 2. S. 125.

13. Kostin K.B. Drajvery rosta mirovoj ehkonomiki // Izvestiya Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo ehkonomicheskogo universiteta. 2017. N 6. S. 20.

14. Kuznetsov P.U. Pravovoj rezhim kak kategoriya i metod informatsionnogo prava // Pravovye ponyatiya i kategorii v kontekste informatsionnogo prava. Materialy teoreticheskogo seminara po informatsionnomu pravu. M., 2006. S. 12-32.

15. Loshkarev A.V. Pravovye garantii: teoreticheskie problemy opredeleniya ponyatiya i klassifikatsii: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. Krasnodar, 2009. S. 13.

16. Mal'ko A.V., Rodionov O.S. Pravovye rezhimy v rossijskom zakonodatel'stve // Zhurnal rossijskogo prava. 2001. № 9. S. 19.

17. Matuzov N.I., Mal'ko A.V. Politiko-pravovye rezhimy: aktual'nye aspekty // Obschestvennye nauki i sovremennost'. 1997. № 1. S. 64.

18. Mokhov A.A. Kachestvo pravovykh institutov i ehkonomicheskij rost v Rossii // Predprinimatel'skoe pravo. Prilozhenie. 2012. N 2. S. 20 - 24.

19. Mokhov A.A. Ehksperimental'nyj pravovoj rezhim kak spetsial'nyj pravovoj rezhim dlya drajverov innovatsionnoj ehkonomiki // Yurist. 2019. N 8. S. 19 – 25.

20. Ogorodov D.V. Pravovye otnosheniya v informatsionnoj sfere: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2002. S. 45-48.

21. Perevalov V.D., Gribanov D.V. Ehkonomicheskie i pravovye osnovaniya innovatsij: problemy sootnosheniya // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2011. N 12. S. 48 – 57.

22. Ponomareva Yu.V. Pravovoj rezhim sluzhebnoj tajny: diss. … kand. yurid. nauk, Chelyabinsk, 2018. S. 90.

23. Pravovoe regulirovanie tsifrovoj ehkonomiki v sovremennykh usloviyakh razvitiya vysokotekhnologichnogo biznesa v natsional'nom i global'nom kontekste: monogr. / pod obsch. red. V. N. Sinyukova, M. A. Egorovoj. Moskovskij gosudarstvennoj yuridicheskij universitet imeni O. E. Kutafina (MGYuA). M.: Prospekt, 2019. S. 12-19.

24. Rodionov O.S. Mekhanizm ustanovleniya pravovykh rezhimov rossijskim zakonodatel'stvom: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. Saratov, 2001. S 29.

25. Senchischev V.I. Pravovoe regulirovanie prav na nedvizhimost' i sdelok s nej // Zhurnal rossijskogo prava. 1999. S. 14.

26. Smirnov D.A. O nekotorykh voprosakh sootnosheniya zakonodatel'stva o gosudarstvennoj tajne i trudovogo zakonodatel'stva // Vestnik trudovogo prava i prava sotsial'nogo obespecheniya. 2010. № 5 (5). S. 83.

27. Tereschenko L.K. Pravovoj rezhim informatsii: Avtref. dokt. yurid. nauk. M., 2011. S. 31.

28. Tereschenko, L.K. Pravovye osnovy spetsial'nykh rezhimov informatsii // Yuridicheskij konsul'tant. 2007. № 9. S. 5-14.

29. Tolmachevets Yu.A., Lisovskij M.I. Perspektivnye vozmozhnosti i preimuschestva vnedreniya regulyativnykh pesochnits // Ehkonomika i sotsium. 2019. N 1-1 (56). S. 934 - 938.

30. Trofimov V.V. Pravozaschitnaya funktsiya pravovoj politiki v sfere innovatsij: teoreticheskoe opredelenie i problemy realizatsii // Rossijskij zhurnal pravovykh issledovanij. 2015. N 2. S. 51 - 55.

31. Frolov D.P., Lavrent'eva A.V. Tsifrovaya ehkonomika kak ob'ekt regulirovaniya: vzglyad institutsional'noj teorii // Ehkonomicheskij analiz: teoriya i praktika. 2019. T. 18. N 11 (494). S. 2044 - 2058.

32. Channov S.E. Informatsionnoe pravo Rossii: ucheb. Dlya ssuzov. Moskva: Prior-izdat,, 2004. S. 178.

33. Cherepanova E.V. Pravovoj ehksperiment kak mekhanizm aprobatsii tekhnologij ehlektronnoj torgovli // Mezhdunarodnoe publichnoe i chastnoe pravo. 2020. N 6. S. 38 - 41.