«ELECTRONIC EVIDENCE» IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS: ON THE APPROPRIATENESS OF LEGAL REGULATION

 
PIIS160565900028929-5-1
DOI10.61205/S160565900028929-5
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Occupation: Associate Professor of the Department of Criminal Procedure and Criminalistics of the Law Faculty, Orenburg State University
Affiliation: Orenburg State University
Address: Orenburg, 460000, Orenburg region, Orenburg, st. Vostochnaya, 29, apt. 7
Journal nameJournal of Russian Law
Edition
Abstract

The process of global digitalization is dictated by the natural demand of society to meet the needs of information development, acceleration and simplification of life processes in all its spheres. Criminal proceedings, although strictly conservative in terms of digital progress, are nevertheless unable to remain in an unchanged form, due to their direct dependence on changes in the socio-economic structure of society. Russian scientists have studied the issue of digital development of the criminal process a lot, but we are forced to state that legal regulation clearly lags behind the rapidly changing social relations that arise in criminal proceedings under the influence of digital transformation. One of the controversial issues in criminal procedural science today is the use of “electronic evidence” in proving in criminal cases, their legal regulation, trends and prospects for the development of electronic production procedures. The liveliness of discussions in science, the shortcomings of legal regulation, and the difficulties of law enforcement call for a theoretical understanding of problematic issues and the development of scientifically based proposals and recommendations for resolving them.

The purpose of the study is to study the legal nature of “electronic evidence”, revealing their concept and characteristic features, the feasibility and prospects of legal regulation of a new type of evidence in Russian criminal procedure legislation, the achievement of which is ensured by solving a number of problems: theoretical analysis of scientific views, the emerging judicial - investigative practice of using evidence in electronic form in criminal procedure, as well as foreign experience, identifying its positive and negative aspects.

The basis of the study is the dialectical method of cognition, which made it possible to objectively and comprehensively consider the problematic issues of using evidence in electronic form in criminal proceedings, to identify its direct dependence on the essence of the emerging legal relations, the concept of “electronic evidence” in connection with law enforcement, and the experience of foreign countries. Through theoretical and legal analysis, the characteristic features of the evidence under study and problems of legal regulation were identified, and terminological analysis - the definition of “electronic evidence” was formed. The formal legal method was used to develop proposals for improving the current criminal procedural legislation.

Conclusion: the analysis of theoretical approaches in the science of criminal proceedings to the definition of “electronic” evidence made it possible to identify its characteristic features and, on their basis, formulate the author’s definition. The need for legal regulation of “electronic evidence”, caused by law enforcement practice and trends in the development of social relations, is substantiated by adding Part 2 of Art. 74 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation with paragraph 4.1 of the following content: “electronic evidence”, and also outlines the main directions of legal regulation of the procedural procedure for the use of “electronic evidence”, as well as the legal consolidation of the concept in order to ensure uniformity of interpretation of this legal category, supplementing the criminal procedure law with a separate article of the corresponding content.

Keywordscriminal proceedings, electronic evidence, electronic criminal case, digitalization, informatization, access to justice, information and telecommunication technologies.
Received10.01.2024
Publication date01.03.2024
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

views: 103

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Вехов, В. Б. Понятие, виды, классификация электронных доказательств / В. Б. Вехов // Развитие информационных технологий в уголовном судопроизводстве: монография / В. П. Балакшин, В. Б. Вехов, В. Н. Григорьев [и др.]; под ред. докт. юрид наук С. В. Зуева. – Москва: Юрлитинформ, 2018. – 244 с.

2. Воронин М.И. Электронные доказательства в УПК: быть или не быть? // Lex Russica. 2019. №7 (152). С. 74-84.

3. Григорьев В.Н, Максимов О.А. Некоторые вопросы использования электронных носителей информации при расследовании уголовных дел // Полицейская деятельность. 2018. № 1. С. 1-8. DOI: 10.7256/2454-0692.2018.1.26103.

4. Зигура Н.А. Природа компьютерной информации как доказательства // Вестник ЮУрГУ. Серия: Право. 2009. № 28 (161). С. 50-52.

5. Зуев С. В. Электронные доказательства в уголовном судопроизводстве: понятие и значение // Правопорядок: история, теория, практика. 2020. №3 (26). С. 46-51.

6. Калиновский К.Б., Маркелова Т.Ю. Доказательственное значение «электронной» информации в российском уголовном процессе // Российский следователь. 2001. № 6. С. 18-19.

7. Марфицин П.Г. Некоторые подходы к формулированию понятия «Электронное доказательство» в уголовном судопроизводстве // Юридическая наука и практика: Вестник Нижегородской академии МВД России. 2017. №3 (39). С.106-109.

8. Mishchenko, Е.V., Nikuradze, N.О. and Marina, Е.А. (2022). Criminal proceedings in the context of global digitalization of society. J. Sib. Fed. Univ. Humanit. soc. sci., 15(8), 1082–1093.

9. Оконенко Р.И. «Электронные доказательства» и проблемы обеспечения прав граждан на защиту тайны личной жизни в уголовном процессе: сравнительный анализ законодательства Соединенных Штатов Америки и Российской Федерации: дис. … канд. юрид. наук. М., 2016. – 158 с.

10. Оконенко Р.И. Электронные доказательства как новое направление совершенствования российского уголовно-процессуального права // Актуальные проблемы российского права. 2015. № 3 (52). С. 120-124.

11. Олиндер Н.В. К вопросу о доказательствах, содержащих цифровую информацию // Юридический вестник Самарского университета. 2017. Т. 3. № 3. С. 107-110.

12. Пастухов П.С., Терехин В.В. К вопросу о понятии и сущности электронных доказательств в уголовном процессе // Вестник КРАГСиУ. Серия «Государство и право». 2014. № 18. С. 69-75.

13. Уголовно-процессуальный кодекс Китайской Народной Республики (принят на второй сессии Всекитайского собрания народных представителей пятого созыва 7 июля 1979 года) (с доп. и изм.) [Электронный ресурс]. – Режим доступа: >>>> (дата обращения: 28.11.2023 г.) (перевод с китайского)

14. 杜国栋 中国警方和检察官如何收集刑事案件的电子数据?[Электронный ресурс]. – Режим доступа: >>>> (дата обращения: 28.11.2023)

15. 张成阳、朱梦轩 如何从网络和社交媒体收集证据 - 中国民事诉讼规则指南[Электронный ресурс]. – Режим доступа: >>>> (дата обращения: 28.11.2023)

16. Busser, E. (2018). EU-US Digital Data Exchange to Combat Financial Crime: Fast is the New Slow. German Law Journal, 19(5), 1251-1267. doi:10.1017/S2071832200023026

17. Mason, S. (2011). Authenticity and evidential weight of digital evidence in legal proceedings. In L. Coleman, V. Lemieux, R. Stone, & G. Yeo (Eds.), Managing Records in Global Financial Markets: Ensuring Compliance and Mitigating Risk (pp. 149-164). Facet. doi:10.29085/9781856049177.013

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up