Participation of Russia in the 1860—1861 International Commission on Syria

 
PIIS207987840029670-6-1
DOI10.18254/S207987840029670-6
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Affiliation: Lomonosov Moscow State University
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Journal nameISTORIYA
Edition
Abstract

The definition of the “Syrian crisis of 1860” is based on a series of bloody clashes and pogroms that broke out on the territory of Mount Lebanon and Damascus. These events had such a resonance in Europe that the government of the Ottoman Empire was forced to agree to the arrival of the French expeditionary force and the creation of an international commission consisting of representatives of five European powers — Britain, France, Russia, Austria and Prussia. The results of the commission's work turned out to be quite balanced and successful, ensuring the peaceful development of the region until the First World War. For Russia, participation in the European Commission has become a landmark event: this was one of the first episodes when, after the defeat in the Crimean War, she was able to fully perform in the ranks of the European concert, although, of course, not in the first roles. The purpose of this article is to analyze the role played by Russian diplomacy in resolving the Syrian conflict, and how participation in the work of the European Commission affected Russia's relations with other European powers.

KeywordsOttoman Empire, Mount Lebanon, Druze, Maronites, International Commission, Organic Statute
Received11.08.2023
Publication date31.12.2023
Number of characters26943
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 57

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Berg N. Ocherki poslednikh sirijskikh sobytij // Biblioteka dlya chteniya. 1863. Oktyabr'. S. 1—26.

2. Bulekov A. V., diak. O Maronitskoj tserkvi // Al'fa i Omega. 2000. № 1 (23). S. 322—350.

3. Zhantiev D. R. Mezhkul'turnye kontakty v khode frantsuzskoj interventsii v Livane v 1860—1861 gg. // Frantsuzskij ezhegodnik. M.: Nauka, 2018. S. 240—256.

4. Panchenkova M. T. Politika Frantsii na Blizhnem Vostoke i sirijskaya ehkspeditsiya 1860—1861 gg. M.: Nauka, 1966.

5. Rodionov M. A. Ehtnokonfessional'naya situatsiya v arabskom mire: istoki i perspektivy. SPb.: Prezidentskaya biblioteka, 2016.

6. Rukavishnikov E. N. Uchastie rossijskogo flota v uregulirovanii blizhnevostochnogo konflikta 1860—1861 gg. // Voprosy istorii. 2006. № 10. S. 108—114.

7. Cherkasov P. P. Aleksandr II i Napoleon III. Nesostoyavshijsya soyuz (1856—1870). M.: KMK, 2015.

8. Affaires etrangeres. Documents diplomatiques. 1861. T. 2. P., 1862.

9. Farah C. E. Politics of Interventionism in Ottoman Lebanon, 1830—1861. L.; N. Y.: I. B. Tauris, 2000.

10. Fawaz L. T. An Occasion for War. Civil Conflict in Lebanon and Damascus in 1860. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1994.

11. Makdisi U. Debating Religion, Reforms and Nationalism in the Ottoman Empire // International Journal of Middle East Studies. 2002. No. 34. P. 601—617.

12. Maoz M. Ottoman Reform in Syria and Palestine, 1840—1861: The Impact of the Tanzimat in Politics and Society. Oxford University Press, 1968.

13. Ozavci O. Dangerous Gifts. Imperialism, Security and Civil Wars in the Levant, 1798—1864. Oxford University Press, 2021.

14. Rogan E. L. Sectarianism and social conflict in Damascus: the 1860 events reconsidered // Arabica. 2004. T. LI (4). P. 493—511.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up