Social Risks and Negative Consequences of Diffusion of Artificial Intelligence Technologies

Aleshkovsky, Ivan; Grebenuk, Alexandr; Sidorov, Ilya

doi:10.18254/S207987840019849-2

Home

ISTORIYA

Issue 4 (114)

Social Risks and Negative Consequences of Diffusion of Artificial Intelligence Technologies

Annotation
Reviews
References

Social Risks and Negative Consequences of Diffusion of Artificial Intelligence Technologies

PII

S207987840019849-2-1

DOI

10.18254/S207987840019849-2

Publication type

Article

Status

Published

Authors

Ivan Aleshkovsky

Affiliation: Lomonosov Moscow State University
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow

Alexandr Grebenuk

Affiliation: Lomonosov Moscow State University
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow

Ilya Sidorov

Affiliation: Lomonosov Moscow State University
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow

Journal name

ISTORIYA

Edition

Abstract

The article concentrates on the study of social risks and consequences of a widespread introduction of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies. On the basis of profound interviews conducted with Russian IT-specialists and experts in the field of development and introduction of neural networks authors single out such social risks and negative effects of the widespread implementation of AI technologies as rise of structural unemployment level, increase in economic injustice, growth in cybercrime and cyber threats, fall in the efficiency of human capital investments, decrease in privacy. An ethical component of AI causes particular concern. The conducted research proves that along with advantages and benefits the widespread usage of AI technologies engenders new threats. Thus, assessment of negative consequences of AI technologies and management of emerging social risks are a topical scientific issue nowadays.

Keywords

artificial intelligence, cyber threats, neural networks, social risks, digital transformation

Received

09.05.2022

Publication date

30.06.2022

Number of characters

45821

Cite

GOST	Aleshkovsky I., Grebenuk A., Sidorov I. Social Risks and Negative Consequences of Diffusion of Artificial Intelligence Technologies // ISTORIYA – 2022. – V. 13. – Issue 4 (114) [Electronic resource]. URL: https://history.jes.su/S207987840019849-2-1 (circulation date: 18.05.2024). DOI: 10.18254/S207987840019849-2
MLA	Aleshkovsky, Ivan, Grebenuk, Alexandr, Sidorov, Ilya "Social Risks and Negative Consequences of Diffusion of Artificial Intelligence Technologies." ISTORIYA 13.4 (114) (2022) DOI: 10.18254/S207987840019849-2
APA	Aleshkovsky I., Grebenuk A., Sidorov I. (2022). Social Risks and Negative Consequences of Diffusion of Artificial Intelligence Technologies. ISTORIYA 13(4 (114)) DOI: 10.18254/S207987840019849-2

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 3, views: 486

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Grebenyuk A. A. Potrebnost' rossijskoj ehkonomiki v inostrannykh trudovykh resursakh v usloviyakh vnedreniya novykh tekhnologij // Ehkonomika regiona. 2020. T. 16. Vyp. 2. S. 507—521. DOI: 10.17059/2020-2-13.

2. Karelov S. V., Karlyuk M. V., Kolonin A. G., Markotkin N. M., Sheftelovich D. R. Mezhdunarodnye i sotsial'nye posledstviya ispol'zovaniya tekhnologij iskusstvennogo intellekta. Rossijskij sovet po mezhdunarodnym delam. 2018. Rabochaya tetrad' № 44 [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://russiancouncil.ru/activity/workingpapers/mezhdunarodnye-i-sotsialnye-posledstviya-ispolzovaniya-tekhnologiy-iskusstvennogo-intellekta (data obrascheniya: 25.01.2022).

3. Kitov A. I. Ehlektronnye tsifrovye mashiny. M.: Sovetskoe radio, 1956.

4. Kozlova N. V., Sukhanova N. V., Vorozhevich A. S., Aleshkovskij I. A. Tsifrovaya transformatsiya v kontekste prioritetov gosudarstvennoj nauchno-tekhnicheskoj politiki i voprosy sovershenstvovaniya pravovogo regulirovaniya tsifrovoj ehkonomiki v Rossijskoj Federatsii. // Predprinimatel'skoe pravo. 2020. № 4. S. 3—16.

5. Maslov S. Yu. Obratnyj metod i taktiki ustanovleniya vyvodimosti dlya ischisleniya s funktsional'nymi znakami. // Trudy MIAN SSSR. 1972. T. 121. S. 14—56.

6. Natsional'naya strategiya razvitiya iskusstvennogo intellekta na period do 2030 goda. Utverzhdena Ukazom Prezidenta RF ot 10 oktyabrya 2019 g. № 490 «O razvitii iskusstvennogo intellekta v Rossijskoj Federatsii» [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://www.garant.ru/products/ipo/prime/doc/72738946/ (data obrascheniya: 30.10.2021).

7. Osipov G. S. Metody iskusstvennogo intellekta. M.: Fizmatlit, 2011.

8. Projdakov Eh. M. Sovremennoe sostoyanie issledovanij v oblasti iskusstvennogo intellekta. // Tsifrovaya ehkonomika. 2018. № 3 (3). S. 50—63.

9. Rezaev A. V., Tregubova N. D. «Iskusstvennyj intellekt», «onlajn-kul'tura», «iskusstvennaya sotsial'nost'»: opredelenie ponyatij. // Monitoring obschestvennogo mneniya: Ehkonomicheskie i sotsial'nye peremeny. 2019. № 6. S. 35—47. DOI:10.14515/monitoring.2019.6.03.

10. Sachkova E. V. Iskusstvennyj intellekt i tekhnologicheskaya singulyarnost': ehticheskie voprosy. // Pozitsiya. Filosofskie problemy nauki i tekhniki. 2021. № 15. S. 187—193.

11. SotsioDigger. Oktyabr' 2020. T. 1. Vyp. 3: Tsifrovizatsiya i iskusstvennyj intellekt. URL: https://wciom.ru/fileadmin/file/nauka/podborka/wciom_sociodigger_102020.pdf (data obrascheniya: 20.10.2021).

12. Topilin A. V., Maksimova A. S. Rol' migratsii v formirovanii regional'nykh rynkov truda v usloviyakh vtoroj volny depopulyatsii. // Voprosy statistiki. 2020. T. 27. № 6. S. 26—36. DOI: 10.34023/2313-6383-2020-27-6-26-36.

13. Fedorov M., Tsvetkov Yu. Iskusstvennyj intellekt i sotsial'nyj rejting: nachalo ehpokhi tsifrovogo kontsentratsionnogo lagerya «v interesakh chelovechestva»? Rossijskij sovet po mezhdunarodnym delam. 25 iyunya 2021 g. [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://russiancouncil.ru/analytics-and-comments/analytics/iskusstvennyy-intellekt-i-sotsialnyy-reyting-nachalo-epokhi-tsifrovogo-kontsentratsionnogo-lagerya-v (data obrascheniya: 20.10.2021).

14. Ford M. Roboty nastupayut. Razvitie tekhnologij i buduschee bez raboty. M.: Al'pina non-fikshn, 2016.

15. Shvab K. Chetvertaya promyshlennaya revolyutsiya / per. s angl. M.: Izd-vo «Eh», 2016.

16. Shmagin V. S., Maslova M. A. Obzor i analiz razvitiya iskusstvennogo intellekta // Nauchnyj rezul'tat. Informatsionnye tekhnologii. T. 5. № 4. 2020. DOI: 10.18413/2518-1092-2020-5-4-0-1.

17. AI Russia Works [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://ai-russia.ru/library/. (data obrascheniya: 01.02.2022).

18. Bondarenko V., Aleshkovski I., Ilyin I. The human role in achieving a balance between technological and socio-economic transformations. // Human and technological progress towards the socio-economic paradigm of the future. Vol. 1 of Interdisciplinary Thought of the 21st Century. Berlin, Germany: Berlin, Germany, 2020. P. 53—62. DOI: 10.1515/9783110636147-006.

19. Brynjolfsson, E., Mitchell T. and Rock D. What Can Machines Learn and What Does It Mean for Occupations and the Economy? // AEA Papers and Proceedings. 2018. May. Vol. 108. P. 43-47. DOI: 10.1257/pandp.20181019.

20. Carlsson B. Internationalization of innovation systems: A survey of the literature. // Research Policy. 2006. Vol. 35. № 1. P. 56—67.

21. Conquering AI risks Unpacking and alleviating concerns that threaten AI advancement. Deloitte. 2020 [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/focus/cognitive-technologies/conquering-ai-risks.html (data obrascheniya: 20.10.2021).

22. Felten E., Raj M., Seamans R. The Occupational Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Labor: The Role of Complementary Skills and Technologies. N. Y.: NYU Stern School of Business, 2019. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3368605.

23. Freeman C. Continental, National and Sub-national Innovation Systems — Complementarity and Economic Growth. // Research Policy. 2002. Vol. 31. № 2. P. 191—211.

24. Lane M., Saint-Martin A. The impact of Artificial Intelligence on the labour market: What do we know so far? OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers. 2021. № 256. P.: OECD, 2021. DOI: doi.org/10.1787/7c895724-en.

25. Littman M. L., Ajunwa I., Berger G., Boutilier C., Currie M., Doshi-Velez F., Hadfield G., Horowitz M.C., Isbell C., Kitano H., Levy K., Lyons T., Mitchell M., Shah J., Sloman S., Vallor S., Walsh T. Gathering Strength, Gathering Storms: The One Hundred Year Study on Artificial Intelligence (AI100). 2021 Study Panel Report. Stanford University. Stanford, CA. September 2021 [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: http://ai100.stanford.edu/2021-report (data obrascheniya: 01.02.2022).

26. Bughin J., Hazan E., Ramaswamy S., Chui M., Allas T., Dahlström P., Henke N., Trench M. Artificial Intelligence. The Next Digital Frontier? McKinsey Global Institute. Discussion Paper. June 2017.

27. Müller V., Bostrom N. Future progress in artificial intelligence: A survey of expert opinion. Fundamental Issues of Artificial Intelligence. // Fundamental Issues of Artificial Intelligence / ed. by Vincent C. Müller. Berlin: Springer, 2016. P. 553—571.

28. Rezaev A. V. Twelve Theses on Artificial Intelligence and Artificial Sociality // Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes. 2021. № 1. P. 20—30. DOI: 10.14515/monitoring.2021.1.1894.

29. Russell S., Norvig P. Artificial intelligence: A modern approach. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1995.

30. Tuning M. M. Computing Machinery and Intelligence. // Mind. 1950. № 49. P. 433—460.

31. Webb M. The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on the Labor Market. Posted: 15 November 2019 [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3482150 (data obrascheniya: 04.02.2022).