The evolution of Eurasian relations in the spirit of Great Silk Road: Review of the scientific materials

 
PIIS042473880018965-0-1
DOI10.31857/S042473880018965-0
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Occupation: Head of the laboratory of Integration of Russian economy into the global economy.
Affiliation: Market Economy Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences,
Address: Moscow, Nakhimovky prospect 47
Occupation: Principal Researcher
Affiliation: Market Economy Institute of RAS
Address: Russian Federation
Occupation: Leading Researcher, Head of the Center
Affiliation: Market Economy Institute of RAS
Address: 47, Nakhimovsky Prospect
Journal nameEkonomika i matematicheskie metody
EditionVolume 58 Issue 1
Pages61-69
Abstract

In the review article, based on the methods of evolutionary and institutional theory, system paradigm, analytical assessment and historical approach, a comprehensive review of scientific materials concerning the evolution of trade, economic and military-political Euro-Asian relations and organizational and institutional directions of the revival of the spirit of the Great Silk Road (GSR) as an instrument of innovation and integration interaction in the space of global Eurasia, including without the participation of China, is given. The study is a continuation of the authors' work on the analysis of the consequences of the PRC's Belt and Road Initiative as a "soft power" for the spread of Chinese global influence. The review, classification and analysis of scientific materials concerning various forms of geopolitical confrontation between states and regions for control over trade routes, which can be carried out both through the formation of a huge empire and the creation of interstate-corporate partnership in order to ensure the economic security of long-distance trade from the Mediterranean and Northern Europe to East Asia, are presented. It is shown that the establishment of Euro-Asian relations took place in various nodal points and territories of the world economy: Central Asia, the Italian trade republics, the Nordic countries, as well as through the creation of global trade empires and quasi-state corporate structures by European states. The systematization of risks and negative consequences of the functioning of modern trade routes, the revival of the spirit of the GSR on the political and economic situation of Russia is given. Special attention is paid to scientific research, which warns against overly active involvement of the country in world trade. The vectors of Russia's participation as a leader in the innovative and industrial development of trade routes of the XXI century, primarily in the North-South direction, are determined.

 

 

Keywordsevolutionary and institutional theory, transit economy, Great Silk Road, political and economic relations, military and strategic relations, trade routes, organizations, institutions, EAEU, global Eurasia
AcknowledgmentThe research was made with the financial support of the Russian Foundation for basic research (RFBR) in the framework of the scientific project no. 20-110-50567.
Received16.03.2022
Publication date18.03.2022
Number of characters19386
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 2, views: 463

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Akaev A.A., Akayeva B.A. (2019). Kyrgyzstan in the era of digital economy on the new silk road. Moscow: URSS (in Russian).

2. Akhmedova D.A., Abdugafarov A.A., Abdugafarova D.A., Rakhmatov B.B., Akhmadzhanova R.S. (2018). The impact of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) and the creation of the Silk Road on the economy of the Republic of Tajikistan. In: Innovative approaches to solving the problems of modern society. Monograph. Penza: ICSC "Science and Education", Pp. 234–242 (in Russian).

3. Alimov R.K. (2021). About modern China, cooperation belts and ways of co-development. Moscow: Publishing house "The Whole world". 392 p. (in Russian).

4. Antipov K. (2014). On some aspects of the evolution of China's Middle East policy. Problems of the Far East, 2, 27–37 (in Russian).

5. Ballard J.A. (2012). The rulers of the Indian Ocean. The formation of maritime relations between Europe and Asia. Translated from the English by L.A. Igorevsky. Moscow: ZAO Centropolygraf. 383 p. (in Russian).

6. Bradfort E. (2019). The history of the Mediterranean coast. How Rome and Carthage fought for world domination, Byzantium and the Ottoman Empire opposed. Translated from the English by L.A. Igorevsky. Moscow: ZAO Centropoligraf. 543 p. (in Russian).

7. Crowley R. (2015). Venetian Republic. The rise and fall of the great Maritime Empire. 1000–1503. Translated from the English by L.A. Igorevsky. Moscow: ZAO Publishing house Center-polygraph (in Russian).

8. Elemanova R.T. (2016). The history of the Great Silk Road in Kyrgyzstan. Diary of the Altai School of Political Studies, 32, 334–336.

9. Faust K. (2019). The Great Trade Route from St. Petersburg to Beijing. The history of Russian-Chinese relations in the XVIII–XIX centuries. Translated from the English by S.A. Belousova. Moscow: ZAO Tsentrpoligraf (in Russian).

10. Frankopan P. (2018). Silk road. Translated from English by Yu.V. Sharshukova]. Moscow: Publishing house “E”. 688 p. (in Russian).

11. Goldstone J. (2014). Why Europe? The Rise of the West in world History, 1500–1850. Translated from the English by M. Rudakov. Edited by I. Chubarov. Moscow: Publishing house of the Gaidar Institute. 224 p. (in Russian).

12. Goncharenko S.S. (2017). Strategic partnership between Russia and India in the field of Eurasian international transport corridors. In: Managing the development of large-scale MLSD Systems' 2017. Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference in two volumes. Under the general editorship of S.N. Vasiliev, A.D. Tsvirkun, 399–404 (in Russian).

13. Grousse R. (2020). Steppe nomads who conquered the world. Under the rule of Attila, Genghis Khan, Tamerlane. Translated from the French by V.E. Klimanov. Moscow: ZAO Tsentrpoligraf. 527 p. (in Russian).

14. Hansen V. (2014). The Great Silk Road. Port routes through Central Asia. China-Sogdiana-Persia-Levant. Translated from the English by S.A. Belousova. Moscow: ZAO Publishing House Tsentrpoligraf. 477 p. (in Russian).

15. Inozemtseva E.I. (2015). International transit trade is an important factor of interfaith and interethnic tolerance in medieval Derbent. Bulletin of the Institute of History, Archeology and Ethnography, 1 (41), 33–40 (in Russian).

16. International relations in Central Asia: Events and documents: A textbook for university students (2014). A.D. Bogaturov, A.S. Dundich, V.G. Korgun et al. A.D. Bogadurov (ed.). 2nd ed. Moscow: Publishing house “Aspect Press”. 560 p. (in Russian).

17. Isomitdinov Zh.B. (2019). Sogdians-colonizers on the route of the Great Silk Road. Scientific notes of the Khujand State University academician B. Gafurov. Series of Humanities and Social Sciences, 3 (60), 19–25 (in Russian).

18. Kosov Yu.V., Shmatko A.D. (2016). Study of the Chinese project to create the Silk Road Economic Belt. Eurasian Integration: Economics, Law, Politics, 1 (19), 35–39.

19. Latov Yu.V. (2010). The Great Silk Road-the prologue of the world economy and globalization (to the 2130th anniversary of its "discovery"). Historical and Economic Studies, 11, 1, 123–140 (in Russian).

20. Lissovolik Y.D., Pak E.V., Zhang H. (2021). Economic framework for Eurasian integration: Theory and practice. In: The economic dimension of Eurasian integration. N.A. Piskulova (ed.). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-59886-0_1

21. Motovits T.G., Penkova A.S. (2018). “The Great Silk Road” — a means of expanding and deepening regional cooperation. In: Topical issues of legal science and practice. Materials of the III International Scientific and Practical Conference, 12–15 (in Russian).

22. Omuraliev Zh., Osmonaliev K.M. (2014). Renaissance of the Great Silk Road: Principles of cooperation and diplomacy. Bulletin of Kazy Dikambayeva Diplomatic Academy of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Kyrgyz Republic, 4, 189–195 (in Russian).

23. Pak E.V. (2020). Prospects for the implementation of the transit potential of the Russian Federation and Kazakhstan. World Economy and international relations, 64, 11, 132–138. DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2020-64-11-132-138 (in Russian).

24. Pak E.V. (2021). China's participation in infrastructure construction in Russia and Kazakhstan. The initiative “One belt, one road”. Russian Foreign Economic Bulletin, 1, 93–125. DOI: 10.24411/2072-8042-2021-1-93-105 (in Russian).

25. Pak E.V. (2021). Transport and Logistics in the EAEU. In: The economic dimension of Eurasian integration. N.A. Piskulova (ed.). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: 0.1007/978-3-030-59886-0_6

26. Pak E.V. (2018). Public-private partnership as a tool for building the transit economy of the EAEU: The example of Russia and the countries of Central Asia. Bulletin of MGIMO-University, 5(62), 174–183. DOI: 10.24833/2071-8160-2018-5-62-174-183 (in Russian).

27. Payne L. (2017). The sea and civilization. World history in the light of the development of navigation. Translated from the English. Moscow: AST (in Russian).

28. Semenova N.K. (2018). Eurasian transport integration: The beginning of the road. In: Managing the development of large-scale MLSD Systems' 2018. Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference. In 3 vol. Gen. eds. by S.N. Vasiliev, A.D. Tsvirkun, 232–239 (in Russian).

29. Spooler B. (2017). The Golden Horde. Mongols in Russia. 1223–1502. Translated from German by S.Yu. Chuprova. Moscow: ZAO Tsentrpoligraf. 415 p. (in Russian).

30. Trubetskoy N.S. (2019). Eurasianism: Selected: monograph. Moscow: INFRA-M. 358 p. (in Russian).

31. Tuguzhekova V.N. (2018). The role of the Silk Road in the spread of religion in Southern Siberia. In: The Islamic factor in the integration processes of the Great Silk Road. Materials of the II International Scientific and Theological Conference “The Spiritual Silk Road. Creation. Integration”. Series “The Spiritual Silk Road”, 170–179 (in Russian).

32. Vernadsky G. (2016). The Mongols and Russia. Moscow: Lomonosov. 512 p. (in Russian).

33. Yelchaninov A.I. (2019). Along the Great Silk Road-the Ice Silk Road-the road of peace and economic cooperation. Journal of Cultural Research, 3 (37), 3 (in Russian).

34. Zhong Ts. (2018). “One belt – one way” as a new form of dialogue between China and civilizations. Yaroslavl Pedagogical Bulletin, 1, 239–243 (in Russian).

35. Zoidov K.Kh., Medkov A.A. (2021b). The Chinese belt and road initiative are the basis for the evolutionary development and integration of infrastructure and integration projects in the Greater Eurasia region (review of scientific approaches). Edited by Corresponding Member of the RAS V.A. Tsvetkov. Moscow: MEI RAS. 146 p. (in Russian).

36. Zoidov K.Kh., Medkov A.A. (2021). Problems of the evolution of transit systems and the interface of infrastructure projects for the formation of a Large Eurasian Partnership. Economics and Mathematical Methods, 57, 2, 64–72 (in Russian).

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up