Behaviour Strategies of the Foreign Diplomats at the Perpetual Diet of the Holy Roman Empire in the 18th Century

The article analyses the changes that took place in the official diplomatic communication of European rulers after the Thirty Years' War and the conclusion of the Peace of Westphalia in 1648, which affirmed a number of sovereign rights to the Estates of the Holy Roman Empire of the German nation (and former vassals of the emperor), including the right to send and receive ambassadors. The new sovereigns, primarily the princes-electors, began to fight for the so-called royal honours (honores regii), which were de facto expressed in a certain set of ceremonies in relation to the ambassadors of the crowned heads and republics assimilated to them. The arena of the struggle for the royal honours was the Imperial Diet of the Holy Roman Empire in Regensburg — a general assembly of all Imperial Estates (in the middle of the eighteenth century — their representatives), by which since the end of the 17th century foreign diplomats had been accredited (first France, a little later — Great Britain, the United Provinces of the Netherlands, in the middle of the eighteenth century — Russia). Having declared their representatives in 1702 as the ministers of the first rank, the electors tried for a century to force the “old” monarchs to send ambassadors to the Diet, and they, by custom, were sent only to the sovereigns. Comparing the various ways out of the ceremonial impasse, the author comes to the conclusion that the struggle for elusive precedence, which foreign diplomats of the second rank (envoys or ministers plenipotentiary) waged with the representatives of the electors at the Imperial Diet, was a deliberately unwinnable strategy, leading either to their isolation or to the recall from their posts. A much more effective strategy that did not damage state prestige was to send to Regensburg so-called ministers without character or residents, who occupied a less honorable position in comparison with ambassadors and envoys, but according to their status were freed from the opportunity to compete with them and, as a result, to come into conflict.

Keywords

Holy Roman Empire, Perpetual Diet, Regensburg, ceremonial, diplomatic ranks, precedence, honores regii

Acknowledgment

The article is prepared at the State Academic University for the Humanities within the state assignment of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of Russian Federation (theme № FZNF-2020-0001 “Historical and cultural traditions and values in the context of global history”).

Received

12.08.2021

Publication date

27.12.2021

Number of characters

39141

Cite

GOST	Petrova M. Behaviour Strategies of the Foreign Diplomats at the Perpetual Diet of the Holy Roman Empire in the 18th Century // ISTORIYA – 2021. – V. 12. – Issue 12 (110). Part 1 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://history.jes.su/S207987840018149-2-1 (circulation date: 28.04.2024). DOI: 10.18254/S207987840018149-2
MLA	Petrova, Maria "Behaviour Strategies of the Foreign Diplomats at the Perpetual Diet of the Holy Roman Empire in the 18th Century." ISTORIYA 12.12-1 (110) (2021) DOI: 10.18254/S207987840018149-2
APA	Petrova M. (2021). Behaviour Strategies of the Foreign Diplomats at the Perpetual Diet of the Holy Roman Empire in the 18th Century. ISTORIYA 12(12-1 (110)) DOI: 10.18254/S207987840018149-2

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 207

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Petrova M. A. Diplomaticheskaya missiya Rossii pri Postoyannom rejkhstage v Regensburge v tsarstvovanie Ekateriny II // Rossijskaya istoriya. 2020. № 6. S. 63—76.

2. Petrova M. The Holy Roman Empire of the German Nation and Its Institutions in the Representations of Russian Diplomacy in 1740s —1770s // ISTORIYA. 2020. Vol. 11. Issue 7 (93). URL: https://history.jes.su/s207987840010261-6-1/ DOI: 10.18254/S207987840010261-6

3. Braun G. Der Immerwährende Reichstag aus französischer Sicht in der ersten Hälfte des 18. Jahrhunderts // Zeitenblicke. 2012. № 11 (2). 2 [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: http://www.zeitenblicke.de/2012/2/Braun/index_html

4. Externbrink S. Nach der “diplomatischen Revolution”. Funktion und Aufgaben der französischen Reichstagsgesandtschaft. Zeitenblicke. 2012. № 11 (2) [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: http://www.zeitenblicke.de/2012/2/Externbrink/index_html

5. Haug T. Ungleiche Außenbeziehungen und grenzüberschreitende Patronage. Die französische Krone und die geistlichen Kurfürsten (1648—1679). Köln; Weimar; Wien, 2015.

6. Haug T. “D’égal à égal?” — Statuskommunikation französischer Gesandter auf dem Immerwährenden Reichstag zwischen europäischen und reichsständischen Repräsentationsformen // Reichsstadt, Reich, Europa: Neue Perspektiven auf den Immerwährenden Reichstag zu Regensburg (1663—1806) / hg. H. Rudolph, A. von Schlachta. Regensburg, 2015. S. 235—250.

7. Niels M. F. Zwischen fürstlicher Repräsentation und adliger Statuspolitik. Das Kongresszeremoniell bei den westfälischen Friedensverhandlungen. Ostfildern, 2016.

8. Stollberg-Rilinger B. Honores regii: Die Königswürde im zeremoniellen Zeichensystem der Frühen Neuzeit // Dreihundert Jahre Preußische Königskrönung. Eine Tagungsdokumentation / hrsg. J. Kunisch. Berlin 2002. S. 1—26.

9. Schutte O. Repertoria vertegenwoordigers in Nederland en in het buitenland 1584—1810. Den Haag, 1976.

10. Schütz E. Die Gesandtschaft Großbritanniens am Immerwährenden Reichstag zu Regensburg und am kur(pfalz-)bayerischen Hof zu München. 1683—1806 (=Schriftenreihe zur bayerischen Landesgeschichte, 154). Diss. phil. München, 2007.