Legal form of financial support of public procurement

 
PIIS102694520014329-2-1
DOI10.31857/S102694520014329-2
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Occupation: Deputy head of the Department of Financial Law
Affiliation: Russian State University of Justice
Address: Moscow, Moscow, st. Bolshaya Serpukhovskaya, 34-5-70
Journal nameGosudarstvo i pravo
EditionIssue 3
Pages89-98
Abstract

The conducted research focuses on the key problem of public procurement - securing public interest through efficient spending of budget funds. In developing the theory and practice of financial support for public procurement, the article considers a contract concluded following the results of public procurement as a legal form of financial support for public procurement.

The analysis of the norms of the Budget Code of the Russian Federation in terms of the expenditure obligation, together with the key features of the contract, made it possible to formulate the author's concept of a "budget contract", which substantiates the priority of the norms of financial law in order to ensure public interest, which is reflected in a number of peremptory norms, such as, for example, immunity budget, etc.

The introduction of personal financial responsibility of the customer's officials, the action, the inaction of which, confirmed by a court decision that has entered into force, will not only ensure public interest, but also spend budget funds most efficiently.

Keywordsfinancial law, public procurement, public interest, legal form, budget contract, procurement contract system, personal financial responsibility.
Received12.04.2021
Publication date29.03.2022
Number of characters40635
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 531

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Baturina Yu.B. Pravovaya forma i pravovoe sredstvo v sisteme ponyatij teorii prava: dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk [Tekst] / Yu.B. Baturina. Moskva, 2001.

2. Bajtin M.I. Suschnost' prava: sovremennoe normativnoe pravoponimanie na grani dvukh vekov. Saratov, 2001.

3. Gorshenev V.M. Sposoby i organizatsionnye formy pravovogo regulirovaniya v sotsialisticheskom obschestve. M.: Yurid. lit., 1972. – 253 s.

4. Gorshenev V.M. Pravovye formy deyatel'nosti v obschenarodnom gosudarstve. Khar'kov: Yurid. in-t, 1985. – 84 s.

5. Zapol'skij S.V. Osnovy sootnosheniya publichnogo i chastnogo v pravovom regulirovanii finansovykh otnoshenij // Sootnoshenie publichnogo i chastnogo v pravovom regulirovanii finansovykh i smezhnykh ehkonomicheskikh otnoshenij. Materialy mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferentsii. – M.: RAP, 2012. S. 9-21.

6. Isaev I.A. Problemy pravovoj formy v sovetskoj yuridicheskoj nauke 20-kh godov // Pravovedenie. 1983. № 2. S. 18-26.

7. Kikavets .V.V., Vershilo T.A. Praktiki neehffektivnogo raskhoda byudzhetnykh sredstv v kontraktnoj sisteme v sfere zakupok // Finansovoe pravo. № 5, 2020. S. 14-17.

8. Masalytina S.V. Yuridicheskie formy gosudarstvennoj deyatel'nosti v usloviyakh politiko-pravovoj modernizatsii: avtoref. dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk [Tekst] / S.V. Masalytina. – Belgorod, 2009.

9. Marchenko M.N. Teoriya gosudarstva i prava: ucheb. 2-e izd., pererab. i dop., M.: Prospekt, 2009.

10. Pashukanis E.B. Obschaya teoriya prava i marksizm // Pashukanis E.B. Izbrannye proizvedeniya po obschej teorii prava i gosudarstva. M., 1980.

11. Sattarova N.A. O pravovykh aspektakh tsenoobrazovaniya // Finansovoe pravo. 2010. № 5. S. 14-17.

12. Sattarova N.A. Gosudarstvennoe regulirovanie tsenoobrazovaniya i gosudarstvennye uslugi: nekotorye voprosy pravovogo regulirovaniya // Finansovaya sistema: ehkonomicheskie i pravovye problemy ee funktsionirovaniya (v krizisnykh i postkrizisnykh usloviyakh) // Sbornik nauchnykh trudov (po materialam Mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferentsii. Saratov, 2 iyunya 2010. S. 173-176

13. Ugolovno-pravovaya okhrana byudzhetnykh sredstv. Monografiya / Pod obsch. red. N.I.Pikurova i E.N. Karabanovoj; Akademiya General'noj prokuratury Rossijskoj Federatsii. M.: Prospekt. 2016.

14. Imeda Tsindeliani, Olga Gorbunova, Tatiana Vershilo, Vitaly Kikavets, Oksana Palozyan, Kirill Pisenko, Elena Matyanova. Influence of the budgetary law on state management in the conditions of the development of the digital economy // Informatologia. Vol 52, No 1-2, 2019 P.17-27.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up