All
 
|
 
 


Structural inertia of economic systems
 
PIIS042473880016565-0-1
DOI10.31857/S042473880016564-9
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Evgeny Toroptsev 
Occupation: professor
Affiliation: North Caucasus Federal University
Address: Stavropol, 355042, Stavropol, 50-letiya VLKSM, 67/3, ap. 8
Alexandr Marakhovskiy
Occupation: Professor of the Department of Economics, Finance and Law
Affiliation: Branch of the Russian Economic University named after G.V. Plekhanov
Address: Russian Federation, Pjatigorsk
Journal nameEkonomika i matematicheskie metody
EditionVolume 58 Issue 1
Pages38-47
Abstract

Systemic inertia forms a transdisciplinary field of studies, which includes interests of natural sciences, technical studies, humanitarian studies, socio-economic studies, etc. Economic science mainly relied on the methods of economic theory and philosophy to analyze this phenomenon. The globality of this subject impeded the formalization of research, and numerical interpretation of inertia were limited to the introduction of a coefficient in an economic and mathematical model. At the same time, the opportunity of getting numerical values of structural inertia in the industry coordinates was provided by basic dynamic input-output balance model, written as a system of basic differential equations. This model’s capital coefficients matrix (according to V. Leontief) is non-singular and can be called the matrix of interindustry inertia. Its elements have time dimensionality. This research presents the methodology for calculating the matrix. Its dimensionality is equal to the dimensionality of the matrix of the formation of the output of goods and services published by ROSSTAT with the interval of two years. This methodology consists of verifiable sequence of algebraic transformations within the input-output methodology with the specified matrix. This research represents the inertia, related to the processes of formation of basic stock, and the inertia of the formation of the gross value added of Russian economy. The high practical importance of the research consists in the development and demonstration of the economic and mathematical apparatus for contrastive analysis of structural dynamic properties of different economies when they are modeled in the coordinates of the same industries.

KeywordsInertia of economic systems, dynamic input-output balance
AcknowledgmentThe article was prepared with the financial support of the Russian Foundation for Basic Research. Grant № 20-010-00084А "Mathematical modeling of stability and macroeconomic dynamics".
Received31.08.2021
Publication date18.03.2022
Number of characters38646
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 2, views: 448

Readers community rating: votes 0 

1. Ageeva O.Yu., Spakhov S.V., Yushkova V.E. (2018). RIGIDITIES OF ECONOMIC SYSTEMS AS A FACTOR OF BOOM-AND-BUST ECONOMY // Vestnik of Voronezh State Agrarian University. No. 3(58). pp. 231–237. DOI: 10.17238/issn2071-2243.2018.3.231 (in Russian).
2. Aglitskii I.S., Kleiner G.B., Sirota E.N. (2018). System analysis of investment activity. Moscow: PROMETEI (in Russian).
3. Afonasova M.A. (2016). On the question of mechanisms for overcoming the inertia of the economic downturn // Fundamental'nye issledovaniya. No. 9-2. pp. 316–320. (in Russian).
4. Baranova N.M., Sorokin L.V. (2017). The impact of human capital on the sustainable development of the economy // Economic Analysis: Theory and Practice. Vol.16. no.12, pp. 2224–2237. https://doi.org/10.24891/ni.13.9.1641  (in Russian).
5. Vilenskii P.L., Livshits V.N., Smolyak S.A. (2015). Evaluation of the effectiveness of investment projects: theory and practice. Moscow: PoliPrint Servis. (in Russian).
6. Voevodina N.V. (2001) Inertia of the national economy: the fundamental basis of research. Ussuriisk: DVGU (in Russian).
7. Glaz'ev S.Yu. (2016). Applied Results in the Theory of World Economic Structures // Economics and the Mathematical Methods. Vol. 52, no. 3. pp. 3–21. (in Russian).
8. Zhuravsky M. Yu. (2005) On the issue of the methodology of investment inertia research // Vestnik TGPU. no. 5 (49). pp. 20–22. (in Russian).
9. Zhuravsky Yu.A. Economic inertia and acceleration in the methodology of economic dynamics. // Economics and Innovation Management, 2019, no. 4 (11), pp. 20-34. (in Russian).
10. Kozyr' N.S., Kovalenko V.S. (2017). Performance Metrics of Industrial Classification in the Russian Federation and Abroad // Economic Analysis: Theory and Practice. Vol. 16. No. 10 (469). pp. 1914–1927. https://doi.org/10.24891/ea.16.10.1914  (in Russian).
11. Leontief V.V. (1990). Economic essays. Theories, research, facts and politics. Moscow: Politicheskaya literature (in Russian).
12. Lyubushin N.P., Babicheva N.E., Konyshkov A.S. (2017). Sustainable Development: Evaluation, Analysis, Forecasting // Economic Analysis: Theory and Practice. Vol.16. iss.12, pp. 2392–2406. https://doi.org/10.24891/ea.16.12.2392  (in Russian).
13. Lyubushin N.P., Babicheva N.E., Usachev D.G., Shustova M.N. (2015). GENESIS OF THE CONCEPT OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF ECONOMIC SYSTEMS OF VARIOUS HIERARCHICAL LEVELS // Regional Economics: Theory and Practice. No. 48. pp. 2–14. (in Russian).
14. Nel'son R.R., Uinter S. Dzh. (2002). The evolutionary theory of economic changes. Moscow: Delo (in Russian).
15. Pavlov K.V., Samokhin A.S. (2007) Inertia of socio-economic and ecological systems // Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. No. 19. pp. 45–53. (in Russian).
16. Polterovich V.M. (2007). Elements of the theory of reforms. Moscow: Ekonomika (in Russian).
17. Rudakova I.E. (2001). On the applicability of the language of economic theory and basic economic models for the analysis of the Russian economy // Voprosy ekonomiki. No. 12. pp. 32–45. (in Russian).
18. Sidnina V.L. (2002). Forms of manifestation of inertia in the socio-economic system // Vestnik Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. No. 2. pp. 150–154. (in Russian).
19. Sidnina V.L. (2009). The manifestation of inertia in the existence of the Russian economic elite // Izvestiya Saratovskogo universiteta. Vol. 9. Iss. 1, pp. 11–15. (in Russian).
20. Suvorov N.V., Treshchina S.V., Beletskii Yu.V. (2017). Balance and factor models as a tool for analyzing and forecasting the structure of the economy. Nauchnye trudy: Institut narodnokhozyaistvennogo prognozirovaniya RAN. Moscow: Maks-Press. Vol.15. pp. 50–75. (in Russian)
21. Toroptsev E.L., Marakhovskii A.S., Duszynski R.R. (2020). The problem of digitalization of the dynamic input-output model // Economic Analysis: Theory and Practice. Vol. 19. No. 5. pp. 946–972. https://doi.org/10.24891/ea.19.5.946  (in Russian).
22. Shirov A.A. (2018). Transformation of the structure of the economy: mechanisms and management. In-t narodnokhozyaistvennogo prognozirovaniya RAN. Moscow: MAKS Press (in Russian).
23. Shirov A.A., Yantovskii A.A. (2017). Intersectoral macroeconomic model of the RIM - the development of tools in modern Russian conditions // Problemy prognozirovaniya. Vol. 162. No. 3. pp.3–19. (in Russian).
24. Shishkin V. V., Kapustina I. V., Kudryavtseva G. V., Shishkin V. I. (2012). Inertia of commercial enterprises as a property of economic functional systems // Mezhdunarodnyi nauchnyi zhurnal. No. 3. pp. 25 - 29. (in Russian).
25. Berns А., Мetchell У. (1946). Business Cycles Analysis // National Bureau of Economic Research. New York. Р.35–37.
26. Blanchard O., Fisher S. (1989). Lectures on Macroeconomics. Cambridge: Mass., HIT Press.
27. Leontief  V. and collaborators. (1953). Studies in the Structure of the American Economy. New York: Oxford University Press.
28. Narula R. (2002). Innovation systems and 'inertion' in R&D location: Norwegian firms and the role of systematic lock-in // Research Policy, Elsevier. Vol. 31(5). P.795–816.
29. Narula R., Jormanainen I. (2008). When a good science base is not enough to create competitive industries: Lock-in and inertia in Russian systems of innovation. United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and social Research and training centre on Innovation and Technology Keizer Karelplein 19, 6211 TC Maastricht, The Netherlands.
30. Różycki M. (2019). Inertia in Assessing the Possibilities of Economic Development: Limits in Modelling Economies. DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.86351.

(Торопцев_Мараховский_Рисунки_1-8_к_статье.xlsx, 191 Kb) [Download]

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up