National and foreign experience in investment support of the innovation process

The proposed article examines the domestic and foreign experience of supporting the innovation process in attracting private, public and foreign investments. The historical experience of the USSR in the implementation of strategic innovative projects has been studied, which has shown that special conditions for budget financing of implementing organizations, as well as strong ties between enterprises, contribute to achieving the goals, although they lead to resources’ overspending. Administrative and policy-making approaches have also been used in the practice of South-East Asian countries in order to concentrate financial resources to achieve strategic goals. Attention is paid to the US experience in bridging the gap between basic research and the practical application of their results through the mechanism of venture financing of innovative companies. Universities play a special role in the innovation process in the United States, which are the basis for the formation of innovation clusters. At the same time, the experience of creating techno-parks in modern Russia has shown that it has not yet been possible to significantly influence the innovative activity of private business. The experiences of China and the countries of Eastern Europe show that foreign investments have a positive impact on innovative development in the conditions of high investment attractiveness and the political will of the state to defend its sovereignty. At the moment, Russia cannot count on foreign capital to build a national strategy for innovative development. The domestic and foreign experience of interaction between the defense civil sectors of the economy is considered. Based on our analysis, we have prepared recommendations for improving approaches to supporting the innovation process in Russia, taking into account the current state of the external environment.

Keywords

investment, innovation process, research and development, science financing, venture financing, government support, foreign investment, private capital

Acknowledgment

This study was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (project 19-110-50340).

Received

15.05.2020

Publication date

22.09.2021

Number of characters

24072

Cite

GOST	Slavyanov A., Khrustalev E. National and foreign experience in investment support of the innovation process // Ekonomika i matematicheskie metody – 2021. – V. 57. – Issue 3 C. 57-66 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://emm.jes.su/S042473880016414-4-1 (circulation date: 19.04.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S042473880016414-4
MLA	Slavyanov, Andrey, Khrustalev, Evgeny "National and foreign experience in investment support of the innovation process." Ekonomika i matematicheskie metody 57.3 (2021):57-66. DOI: 10.31857/S042473880016414-4
APA	Slavyanov A., Khrustalev E. (2021). National and foreign experience in investment support of the innovation process. Ekonomika i matematicheskie metody 57(3), pp.57-66 DOI: 10.31857/S042473880016414-4

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 1, views: 556

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Arkhipenko V.A. (2006). Selection and evaluation of the feasibility of innovative projects of an industrial enterprise on the basis of a criterion approach. Izvestiya TRTSU, 4 (59), 197–203 (in Russian).

2. Glebova O.V., Knyazeva M.S., Melnikova O.Yu., Pogodina M.A. (2014). Selection of innovative projects and the choice of their implementation on the basis of the Resource Concept. Ka-zan Science, 10, 81–84 (in Russian).

3. Golichenko O.G., Samovoleva S.A., Obolenskaya L.V., Balycheva Yu.E. (2019). Formation and Evo-lution of the Model of “Catching-up” Technology. Journal of Economic Theory, 16, 3, 331–345. DOI: 10.31063/2073-6517/2019.16-3.2 (in Russian).

4. Golichenko O.G. (2017). Public policy in the national innovation system: impact on models of innova-tion activity. Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Scientific Conference, 14–25 (in Rus-sian).

5. Dagaev A.A. (1998). Mechanisms of venture (risk) financing: World experience and prospects of devel-opment in Russia. Management in Russia and Abroad Journal, 2, 22–29 (in Russian).

6. Dementyev V.E. (2016). The role of state corporations in the stabilization and development of the economy. In: From recession to stabilization and economic growth. Valentey S.D. (ed.). Moscow, Plekhanov Russian University of Economics, 65–79 (in Russian).

7. Zavyalova N.B., Andreeva A.M. (2020). Mechanisms of development of technoparks as an instrument of transfer of innovative technologies. Economic Sciences, 2 (183), 44–50 (in Russian).

8. Kartysheva P.A., Danilov R.S., Mokhova O.I., Krutikov A.C. (2020). Expertise in venture financing of innovations. Russian Economic Bulletin, 3, 2, 131–135. Available at: http://dgpu-journals.ru/ (in Russian).

9. Klabukov I.D., Yakovets A.V., Alekhin M.D. (2017). Management of system engineering and technical assistance of DARPA defense research programs. Innovations, 5 (223), 12–19 (in Russian).

10. Kuprava E.G. (2016). Development of South Korean chaebols using the example of HYUNDAI science and business: Development ways, 6 (60), 28–31 (in Russian).

11. Lyubarchuk F.N., Imaeva N.D. (2018). Protection of the results of intellectual activity in the conditions of implementation of the state program “Conversion-2”. Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Rocket and Artillery Sciences, 3 (103), 148–152 (in Russian).

12. Makarov V.L. (2013). Science cannot be effective. Direct Investment, 5 (133), 21–23 (in Russian).

13. Okatyev N.A. (2013). Technique of selection of innovative projects to increase competitiveness of the space-rocket industry. Business in Law, 2, 231–235 (in Russian).

14. Polterovich V.M. (2012). Privatisation and rational structure of property. Moscow: Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences (in Russian).

15. Popova E.V. (2010). Organizational structure and mechanisms of functioning of the Department of advanced research projects of the US Department of Defense (DARPA). Possible use of the DARPA experience for Russia. Innovations, 11, 5–10 (in Russian).

16. Pospelova T.V., Yarygina A.B. (2019). Transformation of innovative processes and socio-cultural spe-cifics of the South Korea in the framework of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. MIR (Moderniza-tion. Innovation. Development), 10, 1, 54–65 (in Russian).

17. Prosalova V.S. (2019). The Analysis of interaction of the universities and innovation clusters Japan. Azimuth of Scientific Research: Pedagogy and Psychology, 8, 4 (29), 173–176 (in Russian).

18. Samarukha V.I. (2016). Financial determinants of the Korean economic miracle and their experience for Russia. Siberian Financial School, 4 (117), 24–28 (in Russian).

19. Slavyanov A.S. (2011). Foreign direct investment as a factor of irreversible processes in the economic system of the transformation period. Economic Analysis: Theory and Practice, 25, 32–39 (in Rus-sian).

20. Slavyanov A.S., Khrustalev O.E., Mustafina Ya.M. (2017). The use of foreign experience in the distri-bution of dual-use space technologies in order to save budget expenditures. Scientific Journal of Kuban State Agrarian University (KubSAU), 130, 819–832 (in Russian).

21. Slavyanov A.S. (2019). Investment in the military-industrial complex as a stimulus for innovative development of the national economy. Controlling, 3 (73), 56–63 (in Russian).

22. Slavyanov A.S., Khrustalev E.Yu. (2018). Approaches to optimizing the strategy of innovative devel-opment in the conditions of instability of the external environment (on the example of the Russian manned space program). Journal of Education and Science (Artificial Societies), 3, 113–118 (in Russian).

23. Khalitova M.M., Suleimenova A.Sh. (2018). The world experience of tax incentives for the develop-ment of innovative activities (on the example of Japan). Economics: Strategy and Practice, 4 (48), 124–133 (in Russian).

24. Khrustalev E.Yu., Slavyanov A.S. (2016). Innovation-oriented methodology for assessing the state and growth opportunities of the national economic system. Kuban State Agrarian University, 115 (01), 819–832 (in Russian).

25. Chistyakova O.V. (2012). Trends in the development of business angels in Russia. Bulletin of the Buryat State University, 2, 123–127 (in Russian).

26. Shirov A.A., Gusev M.S., Frolov I.E. (2018). Macroeconomic effects of Russian defense expenditures: A retrospective analysis and forecast. Studies on Russian Economic Development, 4 (169), 3–16 (in Russian).

27. Jung S.Y. (2017). Conglomerates leave a “creative” footprint in innovation centers. Business Korea, March 17 (in Russian).

28. Beck P.M. (2000). Are Koreas chaebol serious about restructuring? Conference Korea 2000. May 30. Heidelberg: Ruprecht-Karls Universität.

29. Butcher M. (2010). Grow V.C Launches, aiming to become the Kiva for tech startups. Techcrunch. Available at: https://techcrunch.com/2010/02/15/grow-vc-launches-aiming-to-become-the-kiva-for-tech-startups/

30. Bygrave W., Hay M., Peeters J. (1999). The venture capital handbook. London: Financial Times-Prentice Hall, 232.

31. Colatat P. (2015). An organizational perspective to funding science: Collaborator novelty at DARPA. Research Policy, 44, 4, 874–887.

32. Gerlach M.L. (1992). Alliance capitalism: The social organization of Japanese business. Berkley: Uni-versity of California Press.

33. Gilson R., Roe M. (1993). Understanding the Japanese keiretsu. The Yale Law Journal, 102, 4, 871–906.

34. Graham A. (2019). State of the venture capital industry in 2019 (with infographic), 6. Available at: https://www.toptal.com/finance/venture-capital-consultants/state-of-venture-capital-industry-2019

35. Jung D.H. (2004). Korean chaebol in transition. Sage Journals, 40, 3, 299–303.

36. Hippel E. (2005). Democratizing innovation. Cambridge: MIT Press. 200 p.

37. Masahiko A., Hugh P. (1995). The Japanese main bank system: Its relevance for developing and trans-forming economies. Oxford, New York: Clarendon Press Oxford. 684 p.

38. Saxenian A.L. (1991). The origins and dynamics of production networks in Silicon Valley. Research Policy, 20, 5, 423–437.

39. Wall J., Smith J. (1999). Better exits, results of a survey of the venture capital exit market and guidance on how venture capitalists can improve exit. Price Waterhouse Corporate Finance-EVCA Perfor-mance, 24.