To Include or to Exclude? The Problem of the Observer  in Cultural and Analytical Anthropology

Affiliation: Institute of Scientific Information on Social Sciences of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Address: 51/21, Nakhimovsky prospect, Moscow 117418, Russian Federation

Journal name

Chelovek

Edition

Volume 34 Issue 6

Pages

7-27

Abstract

The article is dedicated to the study of the role of non-participant observation in the analytical anthropology of Valery Podoroga. Non-participant observation is considered in comparison with the classic method of field anthropology — participant observation. Theoretical objectives and goals of participant observation are formulated, and the general logic of its evolution is identified. The analysis of Malinovsky’s field diaries allows determining significant influence of Western literary tradition on the position of a “participant observer” as well as the fundamental “exclusion” of the anthropologist from the sociocultural context at an early stage of the method development due to the implicit presence of a colonial attitude in the researcher’s outlook. It is emphasized that as the method of participant observation develops, the communicative element increases, which leads to a complete “inclusion” of the researcher in the target sociocultural environment. After that, the role of the method of “participant observation” in Valery Podoroga’s philosophical project is identified, his own opposition between the participant and non-participant types of observation is analyzed, and considerable influence of the phenomenological tradition on the latter is highlighted. The examples provided by Valery Podoroga in his methodological work “Anthropogrammes” (2017) are analyzed. In conclusion, declarative differences as well as similarities of both methods are studied, including the important literary element of both approaches which does not allow considering them as strictly scientific and nomothetic ones but allowing to classify them as ideographic methods. In both cases, the presence of a considerable sociocultural distance between the researcher and the subject of research is identified as a significant characteristic of anthropological experience. Possibilities of a synthesis of both approaches are outlined through separation of the phases of an anthropological study: field study and archive work. The heuristic potential of non-participant observation is identified when determining structural features of the studied commonalities using phenomenological analysis.

Keywords

Malinovsky B., Podoroga V.A., social anthropology, philosophical anthropology, analytical anthropology, observation, methodology, fiction, phenomenology, comparative analysis

Received

27.12.2023

Publication date

27.12.2023

Number of characters

38610

Cite

GOST	Gasilin A. To Include or to Exclude? The Problem of the Observer in Cultural and Analytical Anthropology // Chelovek – 2023. – V. 34. – Issue 6 C. 7-27 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://chelovek-journal.ru/S023620070029302-9-1 (circulation date: 17.05.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S023620070029302-9
MLA	Gasilin, Andrey "To Include or to Exclude? The Problem of the Observer in Cultural and Analytical Anthropology." Chelovek 34.6 (2023):7-27. DOI: 10.31857/S023620070029302-9
APA	Gasilin A. (2023). To Include or to Exclude? The Problem of the Observer in Cultural and Analytical Anthropology. Chelovek 34(6), pp.7-27 DOI: 10.31857/S023620070029302-9

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 1, views: 114

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Gasilin A.V. Metod Podorogi. Okulyarnaya analitika i mgnovenie pis'ma [Podoroga’s Method. An Ocular Analytics and an Instant of Writing]. Chelovek. 2021. Vol. 32, N 5. P. 84–102.

2. Kontseptual'nye struktury [Conceptual structures]. Novaya filosofskaya entsiklopediya [New Philosophical Encyclopedia]. Moscow: Mysl' Publ., 2010 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://iphlib.ru/library/collection/newphilenc/document/HASH01e906864d3e116cfed6f1e8 (date of access: 01.10.2023).

3. Carroll L. Priklyucheniya Alisy v strane chudes. Skvoz' zerkalo i chto tam uvidela Alisa, ili Alisa v Zazerkal'e [Alice's Adventures in Wonderland. Through the Looking-Glass, and What Alice Found There], transl. from English. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 1990.

4. Malinowski B. Nauchnye principy i metody issledovaniya kul'turnogo izmeneniya [Scientific principles and methods of research of cultural change], Antologii issledovanij kul'tury. Interpretaciya kul'tury [An anthology of cultural studies. Interpretation of Culture.] St. Petersburg: Tsentr gumanitarnykh initsiativ Publ., 2008

5. Podoroga V.A. Antropogrammy. Opyt samokritiki: s prilozheniyem diskussii [Anthropograms. Self-criticism experience: with discussion attachment]. St. Petersburg: Izd-vo Evropeiskogo un-ta v Sankt-Peterburge Publ., 2017a.

6. Podoroga V.A. Vremya chteniya [The time of reading]. Moscow: «Kanon+», ROOI «Reabilitaciya» Publ., 2021a.

7. Podoroga V.A. Vtoroj ekran. Sergej Ejzenshtejn i kinematograf nasiliya. T. 1. Zerkal'naya podporka. Materialy k psihobiografii [Second screen. Sergei Eisenstein and the cinema of violence. Vol. 1. Mirror stand. Materials for psychobiography]. Moscow: BREUS Publ., 2017b.

8. Podoroga V.A. Vtoroy ekran. Sergey Eyzenshteyn i kinematograf nasiliya. T. 2. Prototelo. Fragmenty vizual’noy antropologii [Second screen. Sergei Eisenstein and the cinema of violence. Vol. 2. Protobody. Fragments of visual anthropology]. Moscow: BREUS Publ., 2020a.

9. Podoroga V.A. Metafizika landshafta. Kommunikativnyye strategii v filosofskoy kul’ture XIX–XX vekov [Landscape metaphysics. Communication strategies in the philosophical culture of the XIX–XX centuries]. Moscow: «Kanon+», ROOI «Reabilitaciya» Publ., 2021b.

10. Podoroga V.A. Mimesis. Materialy po analiticheskoy antropologii literatury. T. 1. N. Gogol’, F. Dostoyevskiy [Mimesis. Materials on the analytical anthropology of literature. Vol. 1. N. Gogol, F. Dostoevsky]. Moscow: Kul'turnaya revolyutsiya, Logos, Logos-altera Publ., 2006.

11. Podoroga V.A. Mimesis. Materialy po analiticheskoy antropologii literatury T. 2. Chast’ I. Ideya proizvedeniya. Experimentum crucis v literature XX veka. A. Belyy, A. Platonov, gruppa Oberiu [Mimesis. Materials on the analytical anthropology of literature. Vol. 2. Part I. The idea of the work. Experimentum crucis in literature of 20th century. A. Bely, A. Platonov, Oberiu group]. Moscow: Kul’turnaya revolyutsiya Publ., 2011.

12. Podoroga V.A. Parabola. Frants Kafka i konstruktsiya snovideniya. Analiticheskaya antropologiya literatury [Parabola. Franz Kafka and the construction of the dream. Analytical anthropology of literature]. Moscow: Kul’turnaya revolyutsiya Publ., 2020b.

13. Foucault M. L'Herméneutique du sujet. Paris: Gallimard, 2001.

14. Malinowski B. A Diary in the Strict Sense of the Term. London: The Athlone Press, 1989.

15. Thompson Hunter S. Hell`s Angels. : The Strange and Terrible Saga of the Outlaw Motorcycle Gangs. New York: Random House, 1999.

16. Viveiros De Castro E. Métaphysiques cannibales. Lignes d’anthropologie post-structurale. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 2009.