Homo Academicus as a Bearer of Responsibility

The authors explore the problem of scientists’ and scholars’ responsibility for the emergence, development, achievements, and failures of the modern world-system. They hypothesize that this problem of homo academicus (understood as a collective subject) responsibility can be systematically researched in the context of scientists’ and scholars’ activities as personal social and anthropological practices concerned with re-pro-ducing the social. This article follows E. Levinas’s idea that every form of subjectivity a priori acts as a form of responsibility, while also using J. Caputo’s concept of “the end of ethics”, reframing it as a strategy of “open-ended responsibility” in which the structure and contents of responsibility always have the potential to be reconsidered. Homo academicus is one of the subjects of Modernity; it is intimately related to the production of the social. Scientists and scholars as experts, idea generators, consultants, tenured professors etc. take part in and are responsible (alongside other subjects of Modernity) for the production of images of the human being (homo economicus, politicus, religiosus etc.). They themselves act within one of those images — homo academicus. In general, since the beginning of the twentieth century the social sciences and the humanities have gone from the universal rationality of M. Weber to the idea of methodologies with limited responsibility of V. Rozin. Through our study of the existential nature of scientific activity, we come to the conclusion that scientific cognition does not just legitimize social being and point at its problems; it also establishes hope for a better way of being where there's a place for truth, values of freedom, responsibility, friendship, creativity.

Keywords

anthropological approach, anthropological models, anthropological practices of “the care of the self”, social responsibility, practices of responsibility, intellectuals, moral responsibility, social philosophy, ethics in the humanities, homo academicus

Received

28.06.2023

Publication date

28.06.2023

Number of characters

22448

Cite

GOST	, Homo Academicus as a Bearer of Responsibility // Chelovek – 2023. – V. 34. – Issue 3 C. 60-72 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://chelovek-journal.ru/S023620070026103-0-1 (circulation date: 17.05.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S023620070026103-0
MLA	, , , "Homo Academicus as a Bearer of Responsibility." Chelovek 34.3 (2023):60-72. DOI: 10.31857/S023620070026103-0
APA	, (2023). Homo Academicus as a Bearer of Responsibility. Chelovek 34(3), pp.60-72 DOI: 10.31857/S023620070026103-0

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 210

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Ingarden R. Knizhechka o cheloveke [Little Book About Man], transl. from Germ. by E.S. Tverdislova. Moscow: Moscow University Press, 2010.

2. Kasavin I.T. Nauka kak politicheskii sub′′ekt [Science as a Political Subject]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2020. N 7. P. 2–12.

3. Karsavin L.P. Filosofiya istorii [Philosophy of History]. St. Petersburg: AO “Komplekt” Publ., 1993.

4. Laval' K. Chelovek ekonomicheskii: Esse o proiskhozhdenii neoliberalizma [The Economic Man: An Essay on the Origin of Neoliberalism], transl. from Germ. by S. Ryndin. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie Publ., 2010.

5. Levinas E. Vremya i Drugoi [Time and the Other], transl. from French by A.V. Paribka. St. Petersburg: Vysshaya religiozno-filosofskaya shkola Publ., 1998.

6. Levinas E. Izbrannoe: Trudnaya Svoboda: per. s frans. [Selected Writings: Difficult Freedom: transl. from French]. Moscow: ROSSPEN Publ., 2004.

7. Levickii V.S. Konkurentsiya al'ternativnykh proektov civilizatsionnogo razvitiya i rol' institutov ontologicheskoi otvetstvennosti [Competition Between Alternative Projects of Civilizational Development and the Role of the Institutions of Ontological Responsibility]. Aktual'nye problemy Evropy. 2020. N 1. P. 32–45.

8. Levickii V.S. Osobennosti struktury i protsessov konstruirovaniya social'noi real'nosti moderna: avtoref. dis. … d-ra filos. nauk [Features of the Structure and Processes Constructing the Modern Social Reality: Abstract of Diss. … DSc, Philosophy]. Moscow, 2022.

9. Mamardashvili M.K. Strela poznaniya: Nabrosok estestvennoistoricheskoi gnoseologii [The Arrow of Cognition: A Draft of a Natural-historical Gnosiology]. Moscow: Shkola “Yazyki russkoi kul'tury” Publ., 1997.

10. Rozin V.M. Vvedenie v skhemologiyu: Skhemy v filosofii, kul'ture, nauke, proektirovanii [An Introduction to Schematology: Schemes in Philosophy, Culture, Science, and Design]. Moscow: Librokom Publ., 2011.

11. Tishner Yu. Izbrannoe: Myshlenie v kategoriyakh tsennosti [Selected Writings: Thinking in the Categories of Value]. Moscow: ROSSPEN Publ., 2005.

12. Uzlaner D. Postsekulyarnyi povorot: Kak myslit' o religii v XXI veke [The Post-secular Turn: How to Think About Religion in the 21st Century]. Moscow: Gaidar Institute Press, 2020.

13. Caputo J.D. The End of Ethics. The Blackwell Guide to Ethical Theory, ed. by H. LaFollette. Oxford: Blackwell Publ., 2000.

14. Chomsky N. Responsibility of Intellectuals. The New York Review of Books. 1967. Febr., 23. URL: https://www.nybooks.com/articles/1967/02/23/a-special-supplement-the-responsibility-of-intelle/ (date of access: 09.02.2023).

15. Rorty R. The Historiography of Philosophy: Four Genres. Philosophy in History. Essays in the Historiography of Philosophy, ed. by R. Rorty, J.B. Schneewind, Q. Skinner. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984. P. 49–76.