Moral Responsibility of a Moral Agent: Descriptive and Normative Approaches

Occupation: Assoc. Prof., Head of the Department of Ethics
Affiliation: St. Petersburg State University
Address: 7–9 Universitetskaya Emb., 199034 Saint-Petersburg, Russian Federation

Sofia Glebova

Occupation: PhD student
Affiliation: Saint-Petersburg state university
Address: 7–9 Universitetskaya Emb., 199034 Saint-Petersburg, Russian Federation

Journal name

Chelovek

Edition

Volume 34 Issue 3

Pages

41-59

Abstract

The problem of moral responsibility occupies a key place in modern ethical studies. Based on the discussions formed in the academic field, the article considers the features of two main approaches to the definition of moral responsibility and the conditions for its onset: descriptive and normative. It is shown that despite the fact that the descriptive approach aspires for objectivity of imputation and ascription of moral responsibility, regardless of the specification of substantive moral requirements, it is still insufficient to explain the characterization of responsibility as moral. Therefore, the descriptive approach must necessarily be supplemented by a normative approach, so it becomes possible to define a moral agent not just as an object of responsibility, but also as an actor with the property of being morally responsible. The key to resolving the issue of different approaches to moral responsibility is to consider the concepts of strict and zero responsibility as specific conditions for imputing responsibility to an agent, which are impossible within the framework of an exclusively descriptive approach. It is shown that from an ethical perspective, these types of legal responsibility “without fault” imply normative attitudes towards actors who are considered as full-fledged moral agents. The ethical analysis of strict and zero responsibility demonstrates the conditions for the positive moral responsibility within the framework of the normative approach, namely the desire to maintain a normative order focused on maintaining the “good life”. The combined use of descriptive and normative approaches with simultaneous reference to the moral agent's own characteristics makes it possible to clarify the features of moral responsibility.

Keywords

ethics, responsibility, moral responsibility, strict responsibility, zero responsibility, moral agent, descriptive approach, ascription, normative approach, good life.

Received

28.06.2023

Publication date

28.06.2023

Number of characters

34620

Cite

GOST	Perov V., Glebova S. Moral Responsibility of a Moral Agent: Descriptive and Normative Approaches // Chelovek – 2023. – V. 34. – Issue 3 C. 41-59 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://chelovek-journal.ru/S023620070026102-9-1 (circulation date: 17.05.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S023620070026102-9
MLA	Perov, Vadim Yu, Glebova, Sofia "Moral Responsibility of a Moral Agent: Descriptive and Normative Approaches." Chelovek 34.3 (2023):41-59. DOI: 10.31857/S023620070026102-9
APA	Perov V., Glebova S. (2023). Moral Responsibility of a Moral Agent: Descriptive and Normative Approaches. Chelovek 34(3), pp.41-59 DOI: 10.31857/S023620070026102-9

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 197

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Grazhdanskij kodeks Rossijskoj Federacii (chast' vtoraya) [Civil Code of the Russian Federation (Part Two)]: Federal'nyj zakon № 51 from 30 November 1996. URL: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_9027/ (date of access: 25.02.2023).

2. Guseynov A.A. Chto novogo v «novoj etike»? [What is new in the “new Ethics”]. Vedomosti prikladnoj etiki. 2021. N 58. P. 91–106.

3. Loginov E.V., Gavrilov M.V., Mercalov A.V., Yunusov A.T. Prolegomeny k moral'noj otvetstvennosti. Finikovyj Kompot. 2020. N 15. P. 3–100.

4. Loginov E.V., Gavrilov M.V., Mercalov A.V., Yunusov A.T. Etika i metafizika moral'noj otvetstvennosti [Ethics and Metaphysics of Moral Responsibility]. Eticheskaya mysl'. 2021. Vol. 21. N 2. P. 35–47.

5. Apressyan R.G.*., Besedin A.P., Vasil'ev V.V., Kostikova A.A. et al. Materialy obsuzhdeniya «Prolegomen k moral'noj otvetstvennosti» [Proceedings of a Discussion on «Prolegomena to Moral Responsibility»]. Eticheskaya mysl'. 2021. Vol. 21. N 2. P. 35–47.

6. Perov V.Yu. Kakim professiyam nuzhna professional'naya etika? [Which professions need professional ethics?]. Vedomosti prikladnoj etiki. 2017. N 50. P. 67–78.

7. Postanovlenie Pravitel'stva Rossijskoj Federacii “O Pravilah dorozhnogo dvizheniya” [Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation “On the Rules of the Road”]: N 1090 from 23.10.1993. URL: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_2709/ (date of access: 25.02.2023).

8. Prokof'ev A.V. Spravedlivost' i otvetstvennost': social'no-eticheskie problemy v filosofii morali [Justice and Responsibility: Social and Ethical Problems in Moral Philosophy]. Tula: Izdatel’stvo Tul’skogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta im. L.N. Tolstogo Publ., 2006.

9. Riker P. Ponyatie otvetstvennosti: opyt semanticheskogo analiza [The Concept of Responsibility: an Essay in Semantic Analysis]. Spravedlivoe. Moscow: Gnozis/Logos Publ., 2005. P. 41–61.

10. Ugolovnyj kodeks Rossijskoj Federacii [Criminal Code of the Russian Federation]: Federal'nyj zakon № 63 from 13 June 1996. URL: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_10699/ (date of access: 25.02.2023).

11. Filosofiya otvetstvennosti [Philosophy of Responsibility], pod red. SPb.: Nauka, 2014. E.N. Lisanyuk, V.Yu. Perova. St.-Petersburg: Nauka Publ., 2014.

12. Hart H.L.A. Pripisyvanie otvetstvennosti i prav [The Ascription of Responsibility and Rights]. Filosofiya yazyka i prava. Moscow: Kanon+ Publ., 2017. P. 27–52.

13. Schmitt K. Ponyatie politicheskogo [The Concept of the Political]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 2016.

14. Hume D. Traktat o chelovecheskoj prirode, ili popytka primenit' osnovannyj na opyte metod rassuzhdeniya k moral'nym predmetam [A Treatise of Human Nature]. Hume D. Sochineniya v 2 t. T. 1 [Works in 2 Vol. Vol. 1]. Transl. from English by S.I. Cereteli et al.; intr. by. A.F. Gryaznov; comm. by I.S. Narsky. Moscow: Mysl' Publ., 1996. P. 63–656.

15. Strawson P. Freedom and Resentment. Proceedings of the British Academy 48: 1962. P. 187–211. U.S. Code. Standards of responsibility.: Title 42 The Public Health and Welfare. URL: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42 (date of access: 25.02.2023).

16. Zimmermann M.J. Varieties of Moral Responsibility. The Nature of Moral Responsibility: New Essays the Nature of Moral Responsibility: New Essays, Clarke R., McKenna M., Smith A.M. (eds.). Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press: 2015. P 45–64.