All
 
|
 
 


Understanding in the field of Social Communication as a Mental Technology
 
PIIS023620070024827-6-1
DOI10.31857/S023620070024827-6
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Tamara Z. Adamyants 
Occupation: Chief Researcher
Affiliation: Institute of Sociology FCTAS RAS
Address: 24/35, bld. 5, Krzhizhanovskogo str., Moscow 117218, Russian Federation
Journal nameChelovek
EditionVolume 34 Issue 1
Pages51-67
Abstract

Mental technologies (techniques, methods, skills) that consciousness (mind) uses for understanding in the field of social communication are the focus of this article. In accordance with the key provisions of the semio-sociopsychology concept, in line with which the article is made, the success of understanding in the field of social communication is associated with such technologies that allow you to “see” in any holistic, complete communicative act latent multi-level structures, the top of which is the author's intentionality, or constant meaning. A series of studies using the method of motive-targeted analysis allowed to designate the parameters of groups of people who differ in the quality of understanding of constant meanings in the perception of holistic, completed works. A relationship has also been found between the quality of understanding the intentionality of the author and the virtual forms through which consciousness “masters” the perceived work: from widespread linear to rarer multi-level, voluminous. The recorded fact of different quality of understanding in the field of social communication allowed to draw an analogy with the theory of the collective unconscious and the phenomenon of archetypes in the interpretation of C.G. Jung. Various mental technologies, which are used by large groups of people, really “live” in society, which affects the features of their socialization and social adaptation and, in general, the trends and vector of socially significant processes. However, thanks to the developments of Russian academic science, comprehension skills in the field of social communication can be improved; the experiments carried out show a positive trend.

Keywordsunderstanding; social communication; meaning; semio-sociopsihology; intent; method of motive-target analysis; mental technologies; consciousness; mind; Jung archetypes; social adaptation
Received28.03.2023
Publication date30.03.2023
Number of characters29304
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 175

Readers community rating: votes 0 

1. Abushenko V.L. Ponimanie [Understanding]. Sotsiologiya. Entsiklopediya [Sociology. Encyclopedia], compil. by A.A. Gritsanov, V.L. Abushenko, G.M. Evelkin, G.N. Sokolova, O.V. Tereshchenko. Minsk: Knizhnyi Dom Publ., 2003.
2. Hadamard J. Issledovanie psihologii processa izobreteniya v oblasti matematiki [An eassay on the psychology of invention in the mathematical field], transl. from French by M.A. Shatalov, O.P. Shatalova. Moscow: Sovetskoye Radio Publ., 1970.
3. Adamyants T.Z. Koncepcii ponimanija v kommunikacii: v poiskah platformy dlja vzaimoponimanija [Concepts of Understanding in Communication: In Search of a Platform for Mutual Understanding]. Obschestvennye nauki i sovremennost’. 2014. N 4. P. 121–131.
4. Adamyants T.Z. Massovoe sociomental’noe razvitie: mif ili real'naja vozmozhnost’? [Mass Sociomental Development: Myth or Real Possibility?]. Obschestvennye nauki i sovremennost’. 2012. N 1. Р. 27–38.
5. Adamyants T.Z. Zadachi i metodu sociomel’nogo razvitiya sovremennoy molod’odgi [Tasks and methods of sociomental development of modern youth]. Mir psihologii. 2017. N 1(89). Р. 69–78.
6. Alexander J., Smith Ph. Sil’naya programma v kultursociologii [Strong Program in Cultural Sociology]. Sotsiologicheskoye obozreniye. 2010. Vol. 9, N 2. P. 11–30.
7. Weber M. Osnovnye sotsiologicheskie ponyatiya [Basic concepts in sociology]. Weber M. Izbrannye proizvedeniya [Selected works], transl. from Germ. by M.I. Levina. Moscow: Progress Publ., 1990. P. 602–643.
8. Husserl E. Amsterdamskie doklady II [Amsterdam Reports]. Logos. 1994. N 5. P. 7–24.
9. W. Dilthey Opisatel’naya psihologiya [Descriptive Psychology and Historical Understanding], transl. from Germ. St. Petersburg: Aletheia Publ., 1996.
10. Dridze T.M. Dve novye paradigmy dlja social’nogo poznanija i social’noj praktiki [Two New Paradigms for Social Cognition and Social Practice]. Social’naja kommunikacija i social’noe upravlenie v jekoantropocentricheskoj i semio-sociopsihologicheskoj paradigmah: v 2 kn. Kn. 1. [Social communication and social management in ecoanthropocentric and semiosociopsychological paradigms: in 2 books. Book 1]. Moscow: IS RAS Publ., 2000. P. 5–42.
11. Dridze T.M. Ot germenevtiki k semiosociopsihologii: ot «tvortheskogo» tolkovanija teksta k ponimaniy kommunikativnoj intencii avtora [From hermeneutics to semio-sociopsychology: from the “creative” interpretation of the text to the understanding of the communicative intention of the author]. Social’naja kommunikacija i social’noe upravlenie v jekoantropocentricheskoj i semio-sociopsihologicheskoj paradigmah: v 2 kn. Kn. 2. [Social communication and social management in ecoanthropocentric and semiosociopsychological paradigms: in 2 books. Book 2]. Moscow: IS RAS Publ., 2000. P. 115–137.
12. Dridze T.M. Tekstovaja dejatel’nost’ v structure social’noj kommunikacii [Text activity in the structure of social communication]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 1984.
13. Znakov V.V. Ponimanie v mushlenii, obcthenii, thelovetheskom butii [Understanding in Thinking, Communication, human being]. Moscow: Institute of Psychology of Russian Academy of Sciences Publ., 2007.
14. Leontiev A.N. Deyetel’nost’. Soznanie. Lichnost’ [Activities. Consciousness. Personality]. Moscow: Politizdat Publ., 1975.
15. Leontiev D.A. Psihologiya smysla: priroda, stroenie I dinamika smyslovoy real’nosti [Psychology of Meaning: Nature, Structure, and Dynamics of Semantic Reality]. Moscow: Smysl Publ., 2019.
16. Luhmann N. Obschestvo kak social’naya sistema [Society as a Social System], transl. from Germ. by A. Antonovsky. Moscow: Logos Publ., 2004.
17. Poincare H. Matematimatitheskoye tvorthestvo [Mathematical creativity]. Vestnik oputnoy fiziki i elementartoj matematiki (V.O.F.A.M.) [Bulletin of Experimental Physics and Elementary Mathematics]. 1909. Issue 483. P. 57–63.
18. Ricoeur P. Model’ texta: osmyslennoye dey’stvie kak text [The Model of the Text: Meaningful Action Considered as a Text], transl. from Engl. by A. Borisenkova. Sotsiologicheskoye obozreniye. Vol. 7, N 1. P. 25–43.
19. Tolstoy L.N. Pedagodicheskie stat’i 1860–1863 gg. [Pedagogical articles of 1860–1863]. Polnoye sobranie sochineniye [Complete Works]. Vol. 8. Moscow: Khudozhestvennaya literatura Publ., 1936.
20. Foucault M. Slova i vesthi: Archeologya gumanitarnukh nauk [The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences], transl. from French by V.P. Vizgin, N.S. Autonomova. St. Petersburg: A-cad Publ., 1994.
21. Schutz A. Izbrannoye: Mir svetyatshiysya smyslom [Selected works: A World Shining Meaning], transl. from Germ. and Engl. by V.G. Nikolaev, S.V. Romashko, N.M. Smirnova. Moscow: ROSSPEN Publ., 2004.
22. Jung С.G. Bog i bessjznatil’noe [God and the Unconscious], transl. from Germ. by T. Rebeko, V. Terina. Moscow: Olimp Publ., 1998.
23. Gadamer H.-G. Philosophical Hermeneutics, transl. and ed. by D.E. Linge. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press, 1976.
24. Oevermann U., Allert T., Konau E., Krambeck J. Structures of Meaning and Objective Hermeneutics. Modern German Sociology, ed. by V. Meja, D. Misgeld. New York: Columbia Univ. Press, 1987.
25. Peirce Ch. Collected Papers. Vol. 6. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard Univ. Press, 1956.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up