All
 
|
 
 


Person in a Smart City: Anthropological Effects and Humanitarian Risks
 
PIIS023620070023382-7-1
DOI10.31857/S023620070023382-7
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Elizaveta I. Speshilova 
Affiliation: Yaroslav-the-Wise Novgorod State University
Address: 41 Bolshaya Sankt-Peterburgskaya Str., Veliky Novgorod 173003, Russian Federation
Journal nameChelovek
EditionVolume 33 Issue 6
Pages105-119
Abstract

The article explores the concept of the smart city in terms of semiotics and anthropology. The author analyzes what axiological connotations, existential meanings, and cultural codes are expressed in smart cities, based on a semiotic approach to urban space as a discourse that can be read and interpreted. It is shown that the human being was displaced beyond the urban narrative under the original technological understanding of the smart city, but subsequently the smart city begins to be interpreted taking into account the smart community, with a focus on people and the human dimension of urban space. The example of South Korea's Songdo demonstrates that a smart city that ignores the cultural context and values of its inhabitants is a functional but semiotically unsaturated and lifeless space. The anti-historical characteristic of smart cities is noted as their axiological feature. The past and the disordered, uncomfortable present are evaluated negatively, while the technologically advanced future is idealized and assessed positively. Moreover, the concept of the smart city transforms the cultural opposition of the urban as artificial and the natural as inartificial. Smart cities reconstruct the idea of a “garden city”, relying not on the desire to conquer nature and exploit its resources, but on the necessity and existential healing of human contact with nature. At the same time, the positive anthropological effects of the smart transformation of cities, associated with the optimization of the daily life processes of citizens, are accompanied by certain humanitarian risks. Among such risks the author refers to the increasing “nervous tension” of urban residents caused by the acceleration of the pace of urban life and the complexity of urban technology; aggravation of social inequality and social polarization; reduction of social ties and atomization of subjects. In addition, attention is focused on the fact that the disposal and management of urban data through the use of smart technologies appears as a new form of covert control of society.

Keywordssmart city, semiotic approach, anthropology, urban studies, information technology, humanitarian risks
Received20.12.2022
Publication date28.12.2022
Number of characters23869
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 224

Readers community rating: votes 0 

1. Avanesov S.S. Vizual'naya semiotika goroda: perspektiva issledovaniya gorodskikh tekstov [Visual semiotics of cities: perspective of urban texts studies]. ΠΡΑΞΗMΑ. Journal of Visual Semiotics. 2016. N 4(10). P. 9–22.
2. Avanesov S.S. Gorodskoe prostranstvo kak antropologicheskii fenomen [Urban space as anthropological phenomenon]. ΠΡΑΞΗMΑ. Journal of Visual Semiotics. 2018. N 2(16). P. 10–31.
3. Apressyan R.G., Artemieva O.V., Prokofiev A.V. Fenomen morlnoy imperativnosti: Kriticheskie ocherki [The Phenomenon of Moral Normativity: Critical Essays]. Moscow: Institute of Philosophy, 2018.
4. Wirth L. Urbanizm kak obraz zhizni [Urbanism as a Way of Life], transl. from English by V. Nikolaev. Moscow: Strelka Press Publ., 2016.
5. Gehl J. Goroda dlya lyudei [Cities for people], transl. from English by A. Toktonov. Moscow: Al'pina Publ., 2012.
6. Glazychev V.L. Gorod bez granits [City without borders]. Moscow: Territoriya budushchego Publ., 2011.
7. Gornova G.V. Corazmernost' goroda i cheloveka: problemy formirovaniya gorodskoi identichnosti [Harmony between the City and the Man: Problems of Forming City Identity]. ΠΡΑΞΗMΑ. Journal of Visual Semiotics. 2018. N 3(17). P. 43–56.
8. Simmel G. Bol'shie goroda i dukhovnaya zhizn' [The Metropolis and Mental Life], transl. from Germ. by K. Levinson. Moscow: Strelka Press Publ., 2018.
9. Zukin S. Voobrazit' innovatsii [Imagining innovation], transl. from English by I. Kushnareva. Urban Studies and Practices. 2022. Vol. 7, N 1. P. 22–33.
10. Kolodii N.A., Ivanova V.S., Goncharova N.A. Umnyi gorod: osobennosti kontseptsii, spetsifika adaptatsii k rossiiskim realiyam [Smart city: the concept and its adaptation to the Russian context]. Sociological Journal. 2020. Vol. 26, N. 2. P. 102–123.
11. Lotman J.M. Simvolika Peterburga i problemy semiotiki goroda [The symbolism of St. Petersburg and the problems of the semiotics of the city]. Trudy po znakovym sistemam [Sign Systems Studies]. Iss. 18. Tartu: Tartu University Publ., 1984. P. 30–45.
12. Lotman J.M. Arkhitektura v kontekste kul'tury [Architecture in the context of culture]. Lotman J.M. Semiosfera [Semiosphere]. St. Petersburg: Iskusstvo–SPB Publ., 2000. P. 676–683.
13. Smirnov S.A. Chelovekorazmernost' goroda [Human dimension of city]. ΠΡΑΞΗMΑ. Journal of Visual Semiotics. 2019. N 2(20). P. 13–32.
14. «Umnye» goroda dlya ustoichivogo razvitiya. Analiticheskii al'manakh fonda «Moskovskii tsentr urbanistiki «Gorod» [Smart cities for sustainable development. Analytical almanac of the Moscow Center of Urban Studies “City” fund], ed. by A.N. Raskhodchikov. 2020. N 1(14).
15. Khestanov R.Z., Suvalko A.S. Kto prinimaet resheniya v umnom gorode [Who Makes Decisions in the Smart City]. Urban Studies and Practices. 2022. Vol. 7. N 1. P. 6–21.
16. Shcherbinin A.I. «Umnye goroda» ć trend XXI veka: vyzovy vremeni i rossiiskie praktiki [Smart cities as a trend of the 21st century: the current challenges and Russia’s practices]. ΠΡΑΞΗMΑ. Journal of Visual Semiotics. 2018. N 3(17). P. 179–191.
17. Eco U. Otsutstvuyushchaya struktura. Vvedenie v semiologiyu [The absent structure. Introduction to Semiology], transl. from Italian by V. Reznik and A. Pogoniailo. St. Petersburg: Symposium Publ., 2006.
18. Barthes R. Semiology and the Urban. Rethinking Architecture, ed. by N. Leach. London & New York: Routledge, 1997. P. 158–164.
19. Benedikt O. The Valuable Citizens of Smart Cities: The Case of Songdo City. Graduate Journal of Social Science. 2016. Vol. 12, Iss. 2. P. 17–36.
20. Caragliu A., Del Bo Ch. & Nijkamp P. Smart Cities in Europe. Journal of Urban Technology. 2011. Vol. 18. N 2. P. 65–82.
21. Deakin M., Al Waer H. From Intelligent to Smart Cities. Intelligent Buildings International. 2011. Vol. 3. Iss. 3. P. 140–152.
22. Gottdiener M. Urban Semiotics. Remaking the City: Social Science Perspectives on Urban Design, J. Pipkin, M. La Gory, J. R. Blau (eds.). Albany: State University of New York Press, 1983. P. 101–114.
23. Greenfield A. Against the Smart City. New York, 2013 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://edisciplinas.usp.br/pluginfile.php/5512376/course/section/6012653/Against_the_Smart_City.pdf?time=1597691067775  (date of access: 15.09.2022).
24. Hollands R. Will the Real Smart City Please Stand up? City. 2008. Vol. 12, N 3. P. 303–320.
25. Husár M., Ondrejička V., Varış S.C. Smart Cities and the Idea of Smartness in Urban Development — A Critical Review. IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 2017. Vol. 245, Iss. 8 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/245/8/082008  (date of access: 12.09.2022).
26. Kim J.I. Making Cities Global: The New City Development of Songdo, Yujiapu and Lingang. Planning Perspectives. 2014. Vol. 29, N 3. P. 329–356.
27. Kitchin R. The Real-Time City? Big Data and Smart Urbanism. GeoJournal. 2014.  Vol. 79. Iss. 1. P. 1–14.
28. Krivý M. Towards a Critique of Cybernetic Urbanism: The Smart City and the Society of Control. Planning Theory. 2018. Vol. 17, Iss. 1. P. 8–30.
29. Shelton T., Zook M., Wiig A. The ‘Actually Existing Smart City’. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society. 2015. Vol. 8, Iss. 1. P. 13–25.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up