Novelty and ambiguity of testing: remembering Paul Virilio

 
PIIS023620070021606-3-1
DOI10.31857/S023620070021606-3
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Affiliation: HSE University
Address: 21/4, Staraya Basmannaya st., Moscow 105066, Russian Federation
Journal nameChelovek
EditionVolume 34 Issue 2
Pages52-67
Abstract

. In this paper I will comment on a few theses of a psychologist Alexander Poddiakov regarding the psychology of acting in new and ambiguous circumstances, as well as that of developing cognitive research abilities. While comparing intelligence, creativity and research abilities testing, Poddiakov reflects upon methodological side effects, namely, doubtful correlation between them, immanent bias on the side of tests’ creators, oxymoronic way to present those tests as a ‘standard list of creative answers’. Notable and worth our reflection is the uncertainty of Poddiakov’s point of view which we intend to scrutinize: while acknowledging the value of intelligence and creativity testing as such, the author occasionally stumbles upon ‘hidden pitfalls’ of this praxis, wherein, undoubtedly, the very ambivalence of the era, which all of us are part of, is revealed — that which has been raised to the level of a civilizational imperative of techno-prosthesization of subjectivity and culture. Mainly I will be alluding to Poddiakov’s article ‘Mind Testing Practices: from regulation to freedom’ [Poddiakov, 2016] and our private correspondence. The aim of a proposed extensive comment is broadening the epistemological space of the discourse presented by Poddiakov, towards questions of philosophical-psychoanalytic kind while focusing on those which consider subjectivity in a broader perspective than that which regards testing practice specifically. I hope that meditations presented below will serve as an inspiring example of a productive trans-disciplinarity within the framework of which it is possible to make a ‘second order’ argument reflecting not only upon the very ‘phenomena’ through the lens of conventional methodologies but also the methodologies themselves. Throughout the article I will address Paul Virilio’s book ‘The Vision Machine’ [Virilio, 2004] wherein the author elaborates on problematics of re-structuring the subject in the context of technologization of visual contact with the world.

Keywordscreativity testing, intelligence testing, techno-prosthesis, virtual reality, subjectivity, corporeality, transhumanism
Received30.05.2023
Publication date30.05.2023
Number of characters30050
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 161

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Wiener N. Kibernetika ili upravlenie i svyaz v zhivotnom i mashine [Cybernetics or Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine], transl. from Eng. by I.V. Soloviev and G.N. Povarov. Ed. and forew. by G.N. Povarov. Moscow: Sovetskoe Radio Publ., 1990.

2. Vinogrodskiy B.B. Iskusstvo upravleniya mirom [The art of managing the world]. Moscow: Eksmo Publ., 2021.

3. Virilio P. Mashina zreniya [La Machine de Vision], transl. from Fr. by A.V. Shestakov. Ed. by V.Y. Bystrov. St.-Petersburg: Nauka Publ., 2004.

4. Hegel, G.W.F. Fenomenologiya dukha [Phänomenologie des Geistes], transl. from Germ. by G.G. Shpet. Ed. and afterw. by M.F. Bykova. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 2000. P. 54–61.

5. McLuhan H.M. Ponimanie media: vneshnie rasshireniya cheloveka [Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man], transl. from Eng. by V.G. Nikolaev; afterw. by M.K. Vavilov. Moscow: Zhukovskiy; Kanon-Press-Ts; Kuchkovo Pole Publ., 2018.

6. Malyavin, V. Rokovaya metafora [A fatal metaphor]. 2021 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://sredotochie.ru/rokovaya-metafora/ (date of access: 10.06.2022).

7. Nietzsche F.W. Rozhdenie tragedii, ili Ellinstvo i pessimizm [Die Geburt der Tragödie], transl. from Germ. by A.V. Mikhaylov, сomp., ed. and forew. by A.A. Rossius. Moscow: Ad Marginem Publ., 2001. P. 47–215.

8. Poddiakov A.N. Trudno byt' chelovekom [It's hard to be human]. hse.ru 2015 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://social.hse.ru/psy/news/152138136.html

9. Poddiakov A.N. Praktiki testirovaniya chuzhogo uma: ot reglamentirovannosti k svobode [Mind Testing Practices: from regulation to freedom]. Obrazovatel'naya politika. 2016. N. 2(72). P. 71–94.

10. Poddiakov A.N. Pravdopodobie i nepravdopodobie virtual'noy real'nosti [Plausibility and improbability of virtual reality]. cyberpsy.ru 2017 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://cyberpsy.ru/articles/unreal_virtuality/

11. Podoroga V.A. Vremya chteniya [Reading time]. Moscow: Kanon + Publ., 2022. P. 15–77.

12. Rykov, A.V. Politika Avangarda [The Politics of Modernism]. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie Publ., 2019.

13. Freud S. Po tu storonu printsipa udovol'stviya [Jenseits des Lustprinzips], transl. from Germ. by A.M. Bokovikov. Sobranie sochineniy Zigmunda Freyda v 10 t. [Works: in 10 vol.], ed. by A.M. Bokovikov and S.I. Dubinskaya. Vol. 3. Moscow: Firma STD Publ., 2006. P. 227-289.

14. Nancy J.-L. The Ground of the Image: transl. from Fr. by J. Fort. New York:

15. Fordham University Press, 2005.

16. Schwab K. The Fourth Industrial Revolution. New York: Crown Business, 2016.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up