Digital contact tracking: a threat to civil liberty or a moral obligation?

Affiliation: National Research University “Higher School of Economics”
Address: 16 Soyuza Pechatnikov Street, St. Petersburg 190121, Russian Federation

Journal name

Chelovek

Edition

Volume 33 Issue 3

Pages

107-118

Abstract

The paper focuses on the ethical dilemmas related to the technology of digital contact tracing (DCT). The author reviewed existing arguments and offers a new classification of approaches to this problem. Ethical justifications to implementation of DCT can be divided into utilitarian and conditional (deontological) approaches. The author tries to prove that the conditional approach is more effective, and it might become the basis for the ethical analysis of specific public health decisions. In conclusion, it demonstrates that the conditional (deontological) approach to the ethical justification of DCT might be used in the discussion about digital vaccination passports (DVP).

Keywords

Deontology, Utilitarianism, Vaccination passports, COVID-19, Civil liberties, Public trust, Information Technologies

Received

16.06.2022

Publication date

24.06.2022

Number of characters

19652

Cite

GOST	Demin M. Digital contact tracking: a threat to civil liberty or a moral obligation? // Chelovek – 2022. – V. 33. – Issue 3 C. 107-118 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://chelovek-journal.ru/S023620070020515-3-1 (circulation date: 03.05.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S023620070020515-3
MLA	Demin, Maxim R "Digital contact tracking: a threat to civil liberty or a moral obligation?." Chelovek 33.3 (2022):107-118. DOI: 10.31857/S023620070020515-3
APA	Demin M. (2022). Digital contact tracking: a threat to civil liberty or a moral obligation?. Chelovek 33(3), pp.107-118 DOI: 10.31857/S023620070020515-3

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 217

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Gosuslugi. COVID treker [Public services. COVID tracker]. [Electronic resource]. URL: https://apps.apple.com/ru/app/госуслуги-covid-трекер/id1517791904 (date of access: 20.01.2022). URL: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.minsvyaz.gosuslugi.exposurenotificationdroid (date of access: 20.01.2022)

2. Abueg M., Hinch R., Wu N., Liu L., Probert W.J., Wu A., Eastham P., et al. Modeling the Effect of Exposure Notification and Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions on COVID-19 Transmission in Washington State. NPJ Digital Medicine. 2021. N 4. DOI: 10.1038/s41746-021-00422-7.

3. Braithwaite I., Callender T., Bullock M., Aldridge R.W. Automated and Partly Automated Contact Tracing: A Systematic Review to Inform the Control of COVID-19. The Lancet Digital Health. 2020. Vol. 2(11). P. e607–e621. DOI: 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30184-9.

4. Chauvin J., Lomazzi M. The Digital Technology Revolution and Its Impact on the Public’s Health. European Journal of Public Health. 2017. N 27(6). P. 947–947. DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckx134.

5. Cohen I.G., Gostin L.O., Weitzner D.J. Digital Smartphone Tracking for COVID-19: Public Health and Civil Liberties in Tension. JAMA. 2020. N 323(23). P. 2371–2372. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2020.8570

6. Floridi L. Mind the App—Considerations on the Ethical Risks of COVID-19 Apps. Philosophy & Technology. 2020. N 33(2). P. 167–172. DOI: 10.1007/s13347-020-00408-5.

7. Gasser U., Ienca M., Scheibner J., Sleigh J., Vayena E. Digital Tools against COVID-19: Taxonomy, Ethical Challenges, and Navigation Aid. The Lancet Digital Health. 2020. Vol. 2(8). P. e425–e434. DOI: 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30137-0.

8. Grekousis G., Liu Y. Digital Contact Tracing, Community Uptake, and Proximity Awareness Technology to Fight COVID-19: A Systematic Review. Sustainable Cities and Society. 2021. N 71. P. 102995. DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102995.

9. Hassandoust F., Akhlaghpour S. & Johnston A.C. ‘Individuals’ Privacy Concerns and Adoption of Contact Tracing Mobile Applications in a Pandemic: A Situational Privacy Calculus Perspective. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 2021. N 28(3). P. 463–471. DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa240.

10. Hine E., Morley J., Taddeo M., & Floridi L. COVID-19 Vaccine Passports: Human Rights and the Need for Pro-Ethical Design. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2021. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3885252.

11. Lee J.K., Lin L., Kang H. The Influence of Normative Perceptions on the Uptake of the COVID-19 TraceTogether Digital Contact Tracing System: Cross-Sectional Study. JMIR Public Health and Surveillance. 2021. N 7(11). P. e30462. DOI: 10.2196/30462.

12. Marhold K., Fell J. Electronic Vaccination Certificates: Avoiding a Repeat of the Contact-Tracing “Format Wars”. Nature Medicine. 2021. N 27(5). P. 738–739. DOI: 10.1038/s41591-021-01286-w.

13. Morley J., Cowls J., Taddeo M., Floridi L. Ethical Guidelines for COVID-19 Tracing Apps. Nature. 2020. N 582(7810). P. 29–31. DOI: 10.1038/d41586-020-01578-0.

14. Oldeweme A., Märtins J., Westmattelmann D., Schewe G. The Role of Transparency, Trust, and Social Influence on Uncertainty Reduction in Times of Pandemics: Empirical Study on the Adoption of COVID-19 Tracing Apps. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2021. N 23(2). P. e25893. DOI: 10.2196/25893.

15. Ranisch R., Nijsingh N., Ballantyne A., van Bergen A., Buyx A., Friedrich O., Hendl T., Marckmann G., Munthe C., Wild V. Digital Contact Tracing and Exposure Notification: Ethical Guidance for Trustworthy Pandemic Management. Ethics and Information Technology. 2020. N 21. P. 1–10. DOI: 10.1007/s10676-020-09566-8.

16. Riemer K., Ciriello R., Peter S., & Schlagwein D. Digital Contact-Tracing Adoption in the COVID-19 Pandemic: IT Governance for Collective Action at the Societal Level. European Journal of Information Systems. 2020. N 29(6). P. 731–745. DOI: 10.1080/0960085X.2020.1819898.

17. Rosenkrantz L., Schuurman N., Bell N., & Amram O. The Need for GIScience in Mapping COVID-19. Health & Place. 2020. N 67. P. 102389. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2020.102389.

18. Taddeo M. The Ethical Governance of the Digital During and After the COVID-19 Pandemic. Minds and Machines. 2020. N 30(2). P. 171–176. DOI: 10.1007/s11023-020-09528-5.

19. Ting D.S.W., Carin L., Dzau V., Wong T.Y. Digital Technology and COVID-19. Nature Medicine. 2020. N 26(4). P. 459–461. DOI: 10.1038/s41591-020-0824-5.

20. Urbaczewski A. & Lee Y. Information Technology and the Pandemic: A Preliminary Multinational Analysis of the Impact of Mobile Tracking Technology on the COVID-19 Contagion Control. European Journal of Information Systems. 2020. N 29(4). P. 405–414. DOI: 10.1080/0960085X.2020.1802358.

21. Whitelaw S., Mamas M.A., Topol E., Van Spall H.G.C. Applications of Digital Technology in COVID-19 Pandemic Planning and Response. The Lancet Digital Health. 2020. Vol. 2(8). P. e435–440. DOI: 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30142-4.

22. Zeng K., Bernardo S.N., Havins W.E. The Use of Digital Tools to Mitigate the COVID-19 Pandemic: Comparative Retrospective Study of Six Countries. JMIR Public Health and Surveillance. 2020. N 6(4). P. e24598. DOI: 10.2196/24598.