Figure of Brahman and brahminical Ritual Thinking

 
PIIS023620070019514-2-1
DOI10.31857/S023620070019514-2
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Affiliation: Institute of Social and Philosophical Sciences and Mass Communications
Address: 35, of. 1602, Kremlin Str., 420111 Kazan, Russian Federation
Journal nameChelovek
EditionVolume 33 Issue 2
Pages111-128
Abstract

The article’s author suggests, that philosophy in Indian culture didn’t arised as a ritual’s overcoming, but arised as a ritual thinking’s development, the most important of that is the unity of word, thought and action, founded on the participants’ ritual’s and everything’s, that happens in it, symbolic identification’s with absolute, eternal divine life’ developments (first of all — world’s creation). The acts of philosophical thought, described in the "older" Upanishads, — this isn’t abstract thinking about world’s principles, which replaced the vedic sacrifice, and a new, more perfect form of sacrificial ritual’s performing, and a special, sacred Knowledge, which has not an epistemological, but a soteriological meaning. The purpose of such philosophy is not to know the world but is an achieving immortality through the sacralization of all things. For this purpose, the most important is the ontologization of the priest-brahman’s figure, transformed into the image of Brahman as the absolute life’s found and the inner essence of the ″self″ (this transformation is described in brahman texts — symbolic comments on the vedic ritual), and the meaning of the ritual formula ya evam veda ("who knows so"), the form of development of which is the philosophical formulas of the Upanishads. Just as the Brahman priest creates the sacral space of the ritual identifying himself and everything, that happens inside the ritual, with the Prajapati’s sacrifice, who creates the world, so Upanishad thinkers sacralize everything that exists and themselves through the understanding the identity of atman and brahman. This understanding is an act of ritual identity, not a theoretical interpretation. The author of the article was helped by the concept of "ritual symbolism" by V.S. Sementsov, who understands Vedic sacrifice as a special type of thinking.

Keywordsritual symbolism, Brahman, sacrifice, ritual thinking, Vedas, Upanishada
AcknowledgmentThis paper has been supported by the Kazan Federal University Strategic Academic Leadership Program
Received06.04.2022
Publication date11.05.2022
Number of characters36920
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 377

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Bibikhin V.V. Grammatika poehzii. Novoe russkoe slovo. SPb.: Izd-vo Ivana Limbakha, 2009.

2. Behshem A. Chudo, kotorym byla Indiya / per. s angl. M.: Vostochnaya literatura, 1977.

3. Elizarenkova T.Ya. «Rigveda» — velikoe nachalo indijskoj literatury i kul'tury / Rigveda: Mandaly I–IV: izd. podgotovila T.Ya. Elizarenkova. M.: Nauka, 1999.

4. Elizarenkova T.Ya. Yazyk i stil' vedijskikh rishi: drevneindijskij pamyatnik «Rigveda». M.: Vostochnaya literatura, 1993.

5. Radkhakrishnan S. Indijskaya filosofiya / per. s angl. M.: Akademicheskij proekt: Al'ma Mater, 2008.

6. Sementsov V.S. Problemy interpretatsii brakhmanicheskoj prozy: Ritual'nyj simvolizm. M.: Nauka, 1981.

7. Upanishady / per. s sanskrita, issled., komment. i pril. A.Ya. Syrkina. 4-e izd., ispr. i dop. M.: Nauka, Vostochnaya literatura, 2019.

8. Ehliade M. Istoriya very i religioznykh idej. T.1. Ot kamennogo veka do ehlevsinskikh misterij / per. s rumyn. N.N. Kulakovoj i dr. M.: Kriterion, 2001.

9. Ehrman V.G. Ocherk istorii vedijskoj literatury. M.: Nauka, 1980.

10. Gonda J. Eye and Gaze in the Veda. Amsterdam-London: North

11. Holland Publishing Company (Verh. Kon. Ned. Wet. Letterkunde LXXV, n 1), 1969

12. Gonda J. The Vision of the Vedic Poets. The Hague, 1963.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up