Continuous Creation: two Perspectives in the Cartesian Нhorizon

Occupation: Ordinary Professor at the School of Philosophy & Cultural Studies, Faculty of Humanities
Affiliation: National Research University Higher School of Economics
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow

Journal name

Chelovek

Edition

Volume 32 Issue №5

Pages

154-166

Abstract

The article argues that V. Podoroga and M. Mamardashvili's understanding of the concept of “continuous creation” is noticeably different in a number of aspects. Descartes breathed new life into the old idea of creatio continua, which thus fell into the Modern times arsenal of ideas; Mamardashvili and Podoroga, in turn, gave it today's reading, in which there are both areas of intersection and characteristic differences. V. Podoroga questions the Cartesian connection between freedom and duration in Mamardashvili's version. In the interpretation of Cartesian freedom, he believes, Mamardashvili follows Sartre: in this case, man takes on the function of God and becomes a necessary condition for his own existence. However, an analysis of classical texts shows that Mamardashvili's interpretation is quite correct: Descartes (and Mamardashvili) proceed from the discreteness of the moments in time, which require special efforts to assemble. The effort of God maintains the existence of the world; the effort of the cogito maintains the being of thought. Mamardashvili draws attention, as Descartes advises, precisely to the causes of being (secundum esse) and to the intuition of discreteness of moments of time, which is important for Descartes. It is also clear that the one who performs the act of cogito does not at all assume the function of God: on the contrary, he discovers in himself dependence on the higher being, which gives the power of creation. The roll-overs and dissonances of these interpretations show that Podoroga's thesis about the absence of "new" in Mamardashvili's ideas, replaced by the creative energy of his "Voice" in the act of thought, needs correction and clarification. It can be said that the transfer of a number of functions from the Logos to the Voice, carried out by V. Podoroga, led to a certain preponderance of corporality in understanding the peculiar method of Mamardashvili. But still, this does not depreciate the significance of the deciphering of the phenomenon of Mamardashvili, which is unique in its versatility, undertaken by him.

Keywords

philosophical method of M. Mamardashvili, V. Podoroga's anthropology, philosophy of Descartes, the concept of "continuous creation", metaphysics of "Voice"

Publication date

23.11.2021

Number of characters

23624

Cite

GOST	Dobrokhotov A. "Continuous Creation": two Perspectives in the Cartesian Нhorizon // Chelovek – 2021. – V. 32. – Issue №5 C. 154-166 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://chelovek-journal.ru/S023620070017444-5-1 (circulation date: 02.05.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S023620070017444-5
MLA	Dobrokhotov, Alexander L ""Continuous Creation": two Perspectives in the Cartesian Нhorizon." Chelovek 32.5 (2021):154-166. DOI: 10.31857/S023620070017444-5
APA	Dobrokhotov A. (2021). "Continuous Creation": two Perspectives in the Cartesian Нhorizon. Chelovek 32(5), pp.154-166 DOI: 10.31857/S023620070017444-5

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 2, views: 377

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. St. Augustinus. O knige Bytiya [Genesis]. St. Augustinus. Tvoreniia: v 4 t. T. 2. Teologicheskie traktaty [Works. Vol. 2. Theological treatises], transl. from Lat. prep. by S.I. Eremeev. Saint Petersburg: Aleteia Publ.; Kiev: UTCIMM Publ. 1998. P. 316–673.

2. Bibihin V.V. Energiia [Energy]. Moscow: St. Thomas Institute of Philosophy, Theology and History Publ., 2009.

3. Descartes R. Pervonachala filosofii [Principia Philosophiae]. Descartes R. Sochineniia: v 2 t. T. 1. [Works. Vol. 1.], transl. from Lat. by Sheinman-Topshtein. Moscow: Mysl Publ., 1989. P. 297–422.

4. Descartes R. Razmy`shleniia o pervoi` filosofii [Meditationis de Prima philosophia]. Descartes R. Sochineniia: v 2 t. T. 2. [Works. Vol. 2.], transl. from Lat. by Sheinman-Topshtein. Moscow: Mysl Publ., 1994. P. 3–72.

5. Kruglikov S.T. Khronologiia sub`ekta Rene Dekarta [René Descartes subject chronology]. Vestnik Russkoi khristianskoi gumanitarnoi akademii. 2017. Vol. 18, iss. 3. P. 68–75.

6. Malyshkin E.V. O dlitelnosti myshleniia v filosofii Dekarta [On the duration of thinking in the philosophy of Descartes]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2010. N 347. P. 47–52.

7. Mamardashvili M.K. Kartezianskie razmyshleniia. [Cartesian meditations]. Moscow: Progress-Kultura Publ., 1993.

8. Mamardashvili M.K. Psihologicheskaia topologiia puti [Psychological Topology of Path]; Prust M. V poiskakh utrachennogo vremeni. [Proust M. À la Recherche du Temps Perdu]. Saint Petersburg: Russkij Khristianskij Gumanitarnyj Institut Publ.; Neva Publ., 1997.

9. Marion J.-L. Ego, ili Nadelenny`i` soboi`. [L’ego ou l’adonne], transl. from French by A. Chernoglazov. Moscow: Pangloss, Ripol Classik Publ., 2019.

10. Maritain J. Tri reformatora [Trois réformateurs], transl. from French by N.N. Zoubkoff. Maritain J. Izbrannoe: Velichie i nishcheta metafiziki. [Grandeur et misére de la métaphysique]. Moscow: ROSSPEN Publ., 2004.

11. Nikulin D.V. Prostranstvo i vremia v metafizike XVII veka. [Space and time in XVIIth century metaphysics]. Novosibirsk: VO Nauka Publ., 1993.

12. Pleshkov A.A. Istoki filosofii vremeni: Platon i predshestvenniki. [The origins of the philosophy of time. Plato and predecessors]. Moscow: HSE Publ., 2021.

13. Pogoniailo A.G. Filosofiia zavodnoi` igrushki, ili Apologiia mehanitcizma. [The Philosophy of a Clockwork Toy, or an Apology of Mechanism]. Saint Petersburg: EUSP Publ., 1998.

14. Podoroga V.A. Topologiia strasti. Merab Mamardashvili: sovremennost` filosofii. [Topology of passion. Merab Mamardashvili: modernity of philosophy] Moscow: Kanon + ROOI «Reabilitatciia» Publ., 2020.

15. Sartre J-P. Kartezianskaia svoboda. [La liberté cartésienne], transl. from French by V.P. Gaidamak. Logos. 1996. N 8. P. 17–31.

16. Shevtcov K.P. Vremennost` v strukture Cogito [Temporality in structure of Cogito]. Vestnik SPbGU. 2015. Ser. 17, iss. 1. P. 61–65.

17. Kerimov, K., & Kerimov, T. Nancy, Descartes, and continuous creation. Kronoscope, 2019. N 19 (1). P. 7–24.