The Phenomenon of Modern Childhood

Modern childhood is a complex combination of interactions and contexts associated with the digital environment, unrestricted overcoming of the spatiotemporal framework in the field of digitized information and virtual reality, advanced development of technological innovations, overcoming of cultural and communicative barriers in the virtual web environment. These factors affect the specificity of modern childhood in the context of educational practices. In philosophy, childhood has traditionally been considered as a stage of human life in the context of the time concept, in the context of the conceptualization of adulthood and the period of becoming an adult. Often children are considered not as inferior adults, aspiring for complexity and perfection, but in connection with the justification of the inherent value of childhood. In philosophical and psychology and pedagogical papers, childhood is studied from the perspective of normativity and autonomy. Growing up is defined as a stage of a significant increase in the autonomy and expansion of the subjective space of the child, at the same time, growing up is associated with a decrease in arbitrariness and spontaneity, an increase in social significance and an increase in dependence on social norms. In such conditions, the question arises whether the autonomy of the child (student) from the adult (teacher) is possible in the context of educational practices. This question is one of the research topics of the international movement “Philosophy for Children”, which sought to bring philosophical foundations to the practice of children’s education, based on the well-known attitude that no one teaches anyone, a person teaches himself through involvement in relations with the world. As a source of education, the authors of the movement, seeking to introduce infants to philosophizing, offer dialogical relations established between teachers and students, suggesting the rejection of the hierarchy of relations and the maximum freedom. However, modern educational realities in the conditions of merging of formalization and organized order with internal tendencies to freedom and spontaneity create new collisions that require resolution. Neoliberal education focuses on the child, while often focusing on the regulation of the learning process and maintaining authoritarian and unidirectional methods of control, declaring the transition to a new paradigm, the center of which is the child and his interests, but at the same time preserving the tools and means of quality control of classical education. In such conditions, the key points in the educational paradigm are the cooperative search for a compromise between “freedom and necessity” and “creativity and responsibility”.

Keywords

modern childhood, the phenomenon of modern childhood, philosophy of education, education of children

Publication date

30.04.2021

Number of characters

15479

Cite

GOST	Frantsuzova O. The Phenomenon of Modern Childhood // Chelovek – 2021. – V. 32. – Issue №2 C. 41-50 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://chelovek-journal.ru/S023620070014858-0-1 (circulation date: 25.04.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S023620070014858-0
MLA	Frantsuzova, Olga A "The Phenomenon of Modern Childhood." Chelovek 32.2 (2021):41-50. DOI: 10.31857/S023620070014858-0
APA	Frantsuzova O. (2021). The Phenomenon of Modern Childhood. Chelovek 32(2), pp.41-50 DOI: 10.31857/S023620070014858-0

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 713

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Bochaver A.A., Zhilinskaya A.V., Hlomov K.D. Perspektivy sovremennyh podrostkov v kontekste zhiznennoj traektorii [Perspectives of modern adolescents in the context of life trajectory]. Sovremennaya zarubezhnaya psihologiya. 2016. Vol. 5. N 2. P. 31–38.

2. Dudenkova I. “Detskij vopros” v sociologii: mezhdu normativnost'yu i avtonomiej ["Children's question" in sociology: between normativity and autonomy]. Sociologiya vlasti. 2014. N 3. P. 47–59.

3. Kon I.S. Detstvo kak social'nyĭ fenomen [Childhood as a social phenomenon]. Moscow, 1995.

4. Kohan U.O. Paulo Frejre i «Filosofiya dlya detej»: kriticheskij dialog [Paulo Freire and Philosophy for Children: Critical Dialogue]. Socium i vlast' . 2018. N 6 (74). P. 55–67. (http://siv74.ru/images/downloads/DOI/DOI-2018-6/6_kohan.pdf)

5. Romanenko I.B. Protivostoyanie personalizma i universalizma v istorii rossijskoj obrazovannosti: territoriya duha. Filosofiya cheloveka v istoricheskom kontekste [The confrontation between personalism and universalism in the history of Russian education: the territory of the spirit. Philosophy of man in a historical context]. Moskow. 2019. S. 31–43.

6. Selli Dzh. Ocherki po psihologii detstva [Essays on Childhood Psychology]. Moskow: KomKniga Publ., 2019.

7. Territoriya detstva: obrazovatel'nye praktiki i manipulyativnye tekhnologii: Sbornik nauchnyh trudov [Territory of childhood: educational practices and manipulative technologies: Collection of scientific papers]. St.Petersburg: Izd-vo Politekhn. un-ta Publ., 2015. [Electronic resource]. URL: https://philosophy.spb.ru/f/territoriya_detstva_obrazovat_prakt_i_manipulyativnye_tehnologii.pdf (date of access: 01.02.2021).

8. Frantsuzova О., Trubitsyna L. Upon the educational potential of the informational environment of educational institutions and some problems of its use, SHS Web of Conferences. 2016. Vol. 29. P. 01024. DOI: 10.1051/shsconf/20162901024.

9. Gareth M., Mullin A. The Philosophy of Childhood. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosoph [Electronic resource]. URL: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/childhood/ (date of access: 01.02.2021).

10. Gheaus A., The ‘Intrinsic Goods of Childhood’ and the Just Society, A. Bagattini and C. Macleod. The Nature of Children’s Well-Being: Theory and Practice, Dordrecht: Springer. 2014. P 35–52. DOI: 10.1007 / 978-94-017-9252-3_3.

11. Rikel A.M. Perception of Social Maturity Criteria, Self-perception and Value Orientations among Russian Millennials. Journal of Psychology and Pedagogics. 2020. Vol. 17, N 3. P. 491–503. DOI: 10.22363/2313-1683-2020-17-3-491-503.

12. Robert I.V. Pedagogical Feasibility of Using Systems on the Web-interface for Implementating the Interdisciplinary Nature of Training, Proceedings of the International Conference on the Development of Education in Russia and the CIS Member States. 2018. P. 36–40. DOI: 10.2991 / iceder-18.2018.8.

13. Rubtsov A. Millennials of the Postmodern age. Will the New Generation Change the World. Chelovek. 2020. Vol. 31, N 5. 2020. P.129–145. DOI: 10.31857/S023620070012393-9.

14. Siegel H. The Oxford Handbook of the Philosophy of Educatio. 2009, Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Electronic resource]. URL: https://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195312881.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780195312881#showmorecontent (date of access: 01.02.2021).