Ritual Protostructure of a Work of Art

Occupation: Professor
Affiliation: Department of Philosophy and Sociology by Institute of History, International Relations and Social and Political Sciences. Lugansk State Pedagogical University
Address: Ukraine, Lugansk

Journal name

Chelovek

Edition

Volume 32 Issue №1

Pages

90-108

Abstract

The article considers the ritual protostructure of a work of art as a text that awakens the process of spiritual initiation (“second birth”) in the recipient’s mind. This is the “inner border” of art, where it shows its derivation from the structure of religious ritual as a symbolic act of overcoming death. Artistry arises where and when our consciousness passes through a point of chaos, through a “break” of being, and then with a new effort again gathers the world into space, fixing this new vision, which has overcome the disintegration, in the strictness of an expressive form. The experience of the “inner”, existential passage through symbolic death can be considered as an analogue of the archaic ritual in the inner world of man. Thanks to this, art in any era effectively fulfilled the existential task of overcoming personal crises. In this aspect, the ultimate ontological categories of human experience — Life, Death, Sacrifice, and Resurrection — fix the basic ontology of a work of art. The general cultural ontology, defined by the dialectic of Space and Chaos, also underlies the structure of artistic reality — this makes it possible to recreate micro- and macrocosms by artistic means. Thanks to this, art in any era effectively fulfilled the existential task of overcoming personal crises. The use of such models for understanding the analysis of the structures of the artwork allows to reconstruct the “inner border” of art — play in this ritual experience of the unity of man with a cosmic mystery of life. The examples of two poems show the “mechanisms” of the ritual meanings of the work of art. Understanding the ritual protostructure of a work can be a valuable basis for using art as a tool for personal development, as a special type of art practice aimed at expanding the existential space of a person. Such art practice is possible only with the ritual understanding of the work as a kind of “existential accelerator”, in which the purely aesthetic, emotional, historical and other aspects of the content of the work go into the context, into the background.

Keywords

artwork, structure, initiation, meaning, ritual

Publication date

19.03.2021

Number of characters

38702

Cite

GOST	Darenskiy V. Ritual Protostructure of a Work of Art // Chelovek – 2021. – V. 32. – Issue №1 C. 90-108 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://chelovek-journal.ru/S023620070014185-0-1 (circulation date: 22.01.2025). DOI: 10.31857/S023620070014185-0
MLA	Darenskiy, Vitaliy "Ritual Protostructure of a Work of Art." Chelovek 32.1 (2021):90-108. DOI: 10.31857/S023620070014185-0
APA	Darenskiy V. (2021). Ritual Protostructure of a Work of Art. Chelovek 32(1), pp.90-108 DOI: 10.31857/S023620070014185-0

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 791

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Bataille G. Zhertvoprinosheniya [Sacrifices]. Kommentarii. 1993. N 2. Р. 40–48.

2. Bahtin M.M. Tvorchestvo Fransua Rable i narodnaya kul’tura srednevekov’ya i Renessansa [Francois Rabelais' Creativity and Folk Culture of the Middle Ages and the Renaissance]. Moscow: Khudozhestvennaya literatura Publ., 1990.

3. Bulgakov S.N. Svet Nevechernii. Sozercanie I umozreniya [Light Nesecery. Contemplation and Speculation]. St. Petersburg: Oleg Аbyshko's Publ. House, 2008.

4. Vygotsky L.S. Psihologiya iskusstva [Psychology of Art]. Moscow: Iskusstvo Publ., 1986.

5. Girshman M.M. Literaturnoe proizvedenie kak khudozhestvennaya celostnost': Istoki i osnovnoe soderzhanie ponyatiya [Literary Work as Artistic Integrity: Origins and Main Content of the Concept]. Doneckaya filologicheskaya shkola: opyt polifonicheskogo osmysleniya [Donetsk Philological School: An Experience of Polyphonic Comprehension]. Donetsk: Lebed’ Publ., 1997. P. 39–47.

6. Eremeev A.F. Granitcy iskusstva: social’naya sushhnost’ khudozhestvennogo tvorchestva [Borders of Art: The Social Essence of Artistic Creativity]. Moscow: Iskusstvo Publ., 1987.

7. Ivanov Vyach. Ellinskaya religiya stradayushhego boga [The Hellenic Religion of the Suffering God]. Simvol. Zhurnal hristianskoi kul’tury. 2014. N 64. P. 7–219.

8. Lihachev D.S. Zametki ob istokah iskusstva [Notes on the Origins of Art]. Kontekst-1985: Literaturno-teoreticheskie issledovaniya [Context-1985: Literary Theoretical Research]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 1986. P. 15–20.

9. Nabokov V. Putevoditel' po Berlinu; Blagost' [Berlin Travel Guide; Goodness]. Nabokov V. Sobranie sochinenii: v 4 t. [Collected Works: in 4 vol.]. Vol. 1. Moscow: Pravda Publ., 1990.

10. Podoroga V.A. Mimesis: Materialy po analiticheskoi antropologii literatury: v 2 t. [Mimesis: Materials on Analytical Anthropology of Literature: in 2 vol.]. Vol. 1. N. Gogol, F. Dostoevsky. Moscow: Kul’turnaya revolyuciya: Logos Publ., 2006.

11. Propp V.Y. Istoricheskie korni volshebnoi skazki [Historical Roots of the Fairy Tale]. Moscow: Labirint Publ., 2004.

12. Puzyrei A.A. Drama neistscelennogo razuma [Drama of the Untreated Mind]. Zoshchenko M. Povest’ o razume [A Tale About Reason]. Moscow: Pedagogika Publ., 1990. P. 149–183.

13. Roginskii Ya.Ya. Ob istokah iskusstva [About the Origins of Art]. Moscow: Moscow State Univ. Publ. House, 1982.

14. Semenova S. Dva polyusa russkogo ekzistencial’nogo soznaniya: Proza Georgiya Ivanova i Vladimira Nabokova [Two Poles of Russian Existential Consciousness: Prose by Georgy Ivanov and Vladimir Nabokov]. Novyi mir. 1999. N 9. P. 183–205.

15. Suchkov B. Tomas Mann [Thomas Mann]. Mann T. Sobranie sochinenii: v 10 t. [Collected Works: in 10 vol.]. Vol. 1. Moscow: Khudozhestvennaya literatura Publ., 1959. P. 3–37.

16. Tasalov V.I. Haos i poryadok: social’no-khudozhestvennaya dialektika [Chaos and Order: Social and Artistic Dialectics]. Moscow: Znanie Publ., 1990.

17. Toporov V.N. Pervobytnye predstavleniya o mire (obshhii vzglyad) [Primeval Representations of the World (Overall View)]. Toporov V.N. Mirovoe derevo: Universal’nye znakovye kompleksy: v 2 t. [World Tree: Universal Sign Complexes: in 2 vol.]. Vol. 1. Moscow: Rukopisnye pamyatniki Drevnei Rusi Publ., 2010.

18. Trostnikov V.N. Chelovek i informatsiya [Person and Information]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 1970.

19. Fedorov V.V. Adekvatno li poniatie celostnosti po otnosheniyu k poehticheskomu miru? [Is the Concept of Integrity Adequate to the Poetic World?]. Doneckaya filologicheskaya shkola: opyt polifonicheskogo osmysleniya [Donetsk Philological School: An Experience of Polyphonic Comprehension]. Donetsk: Lebed’ Publ., 1997. P. 48–50.

20. Eliade M. Aspekty mifa [Aspects of the Myth]. Moscow: Akademicheskii proekt Publ., 2010.

21. Eliade M. Svyashennoe i mirskoe [The Sacred and the Secular]. Moscow: Moscow State Univ. Publ. House, 1994.