Desynchronization of the Public and the Private: The Transformation of Biocapitalism in the Coronavirus Context

Occupation: Researcher at the Department of Humanitarian Expertise and Bioethics
Affiliation: RAS Institute of Philosophy
Address: 12/1 Goncharnaya Str., Moscow 109240, Russian Federation

Volha I. Davydzik

Occupation: Researcher, Center for Study of Globalization, Integration and Socio-Cultural Cooperation
Affiliation: Institute of Philosophy of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus
Address: 1/2 Surganova Str., Minsk 220072, Republic of Belarus

Nadzeya S. Ilyushenko

Occupation: Researcher, Center for management of knowledge and competencies
Affiliation: Institute of Philosophy of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus
Address: 1/2 Surganova Str., Minsk 220072, Republic of Belarus

Kirill A. Petrov

Affiliation:
Volgograd State Medical University
Volgograd Medical Research Center
Address: Russian Federation, Volgograd

Journal name

Chelovek

Edition

Volume 31 Issue №6

Pages

50-67

Abstract

The article deals with the temporal aspect of bicapitalism functioning, which experiences significant transformations in the conditions of outspreading of coronavirus infection. The сentral theoretical point refers the idea of temporal forms multiplicity. This conception was developed in the framework of time studies, by such authors as H. Novotny and F. Braudel. The emergence of biotechnologies which forms new local temporalities, determines the understanding of existence types and modes of biocapitalism functioning. However, the transformation of biological life into an economic resource, which is the core of the phenomenon of biocapitalism, is undergoing significant changes in the context of a coronavirus pandemic. The previously existing correlation of many biological and social temporalities (labor, sleep, reproduction, disease) was brought into chaos, and their dissynchronization occurred. The usual mechanics of biocapitalism functioning at the junctions of these temporalities were called into question. The failure of direct technological control over biological time, the time of virus spreading, turns social temporalities into the subject of such control. The private, everyday, and global, universal values of biological life and biotechnologies have changed, including the shift in the vector of technological hopes. This article demonstrates that time is not a universal resource available to everyone. Existing biotechnologies transform the relationship to biological time. Biocapital eliminates the traditional dichotomy between public and private by changing temporal regimes. The dissolution of the private determines the strengthening of the processes of capitalization of life and health. These temporal aspects of biocapitalism affect social dynamics, contributing to greater fragmentation of existing social classes.

Keywords

temporality, biocapitalism, control, discipline, pandemic, public, rivate

Received

23.12.2020

Publication date

23.12.2020

Number of characters

32262

Cite

GOST	Shevchenko S., Davydzik V., Ilyushenko N., Petrov K. Desynchronization of the Public and the Private: The Transformation of Biocapitalism in the Coronavirus Context // Chelovek – 2020. – V. 31. – Issue №6 C. 50-67 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://chelovek-journal.ru/S023620070013082-7-1 (circulation date: 27.04.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S023620070013082-7
MLA	Shevchenko, Sergei Y, Davydzik, Volha I, Ilyushenko, Nadzeya S, Petrov, Kirill A "Desynchronization of the Public and the Private: The Transformation of Biocapitalism in the Coronavirus Context." Chelovek 31.6 (2020):50-67. DOI: 10.31857/S023620070013082-7
APA	Shevchenko S., Davydzik V., Ilyushenko N., Petrov K. (2020). Desynchronization of the Public and the Private: The Transformation of Biocapitalism in the Coronavirus Context. Chelovek 31(6), pp.50-67 DOI: 10.31857/S023620070013082-7

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 807

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Butler J., Chuhrov K., Bibikov A., Judin G. Kak samoizoliacyjia vliiaet na vozmozhnost’ politicheskogo dejstvijia, materialy vebinara. Moskva, MVSHCEN. URL: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FFpHUla6b_Y (date of access: 18.04.2020).

2. Bryant L. Konchina mira [A World Is Ending] [Electronic resource]. URL: https://syg.ma/@sergey-adaschik/lievi-braiant-konchina-mira (date of access: 20.05.2020).

3. Braudel F. Sredizemnoye more i sredizemnomorskiy mir v epokhu Filippa II: V. 3 ch. Ch. 1: Rol' sredy [Sea and the Mediterranean World in the Age of Philip II: In 3 parts. Part 1: The Role of the Environment]. Moskow: Yazyki slavyanskoy kul'tury, 2002.

4. McCarthy M. Naperegonki s epidemiej. Antibiotiki protiv superbakterij. [Superbugs]. St-Petersburg: Piter Publ., 2020.

5. Marx K. Kapital: Kritika politicheskoi ekonomii. T.1. [Capital: A Critique of Political Economy. Vol. 1]. Moscow: Gosudarstvennoe izdatel'stvo politicheskoi literatury Publ., 1952.

6. Marx K. K evrejskomu voprosu [On the Jewish Question], trans. From German. Marx K., Engels F. Sochinenija. T. 1. [Works]. Moscow: Gosudarstvennoe izdatel'stvo politicheskoi literatury Publ., 1956.

7. Piketty Th. Kapital v XXI veke [Le Capital au XXI siècle]. Moskow: Ad Marginem Press Publ., 2015.

8. Foucault M. Rozhdenie biopolitiki. [The Birth of biopolitics]. Moskow: Nauka, 2010.

9. Shevchenko S. Biokapitalizm i «temporal'naya infrastruktura» biotekhnologij [Biocapitalism and the "temporal infrastructure" of biotechnologies]. The Digital Scholar: Philosopher's Lab. 2019. Vol. 2. P. 89–102.

10. Butler J. Capitalism Has its Limits. [Electronic resource]. URL: https://www.versobooks.com/blogs/4603-capitalism-has-its-limits (date of access: 15.05.2020).

11. Dumit J. Prescription Maximization and the Accumulation of Surplus Health in the Pharmaceutical Industry: The Biomarx Experiment. Lively Capital: Biotechnologies, Ethics, and Governance in Global Markets, еd. by K.S. Rajan. Durham: Duke Univ. Press, 2012.

12. Elbe S. The pharmaceuticalisation of security: Molecular biomedicine, antiviral stockpiles, and global health security. Review of International Studies. 2014. Iss. 40 (5). P. 919–938.

13. Jackson P. S. B. Fearing future epidemics: the cholera crisis of 1892. Cultural Geographies. 2013. Iss. 20 (1). P. 43–65.

14. Nowotny H. Time: The Modern and Postmodern Experience. Cambridge: Wiley, 1996.

15. Schwartz N. L. Distinction between public and private life. Marx on the zoon politilon. Political Theory. 1979. Iss. 7(2). P. 245–266.

16. van Dijck J. The Culture of Connectivity. A Critical History of Social Media. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.

17. Yarimar B. Doing Etnography Remotely. [Electronic resource]. URL: https://iriss.stanford.edu/doing-ethnography-remotely (date of access: 05.06.2020).